vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Skillsoft Corp. (SKIL) and Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (TARS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($151.7M vs $129.0M, roughly 1.2× Skillsoft Corp.). Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -5.5% vs -32.0%, a 26.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (128.4% vs -6.0%). Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($13.0M vs $-19.3M). Over the past eight quarters, Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (134.4% CAGR vs -3.2%).

Skillsoft is an American educational technology company that produces learning management system software and content.

Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is a late-stage clinical biopharmaceutical company focused on developing and commercializing innovative therapeutic candidates for unmet medical needs in ophthalmology, dermatology, and other specialty care areas. It operates primarily in the United States, with lead product candidates targeting common, underdiagnosed conditions including demodex blepharitis and rosacea.

SKIL vs TARS — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
TARS
TARS
1.2× larger
TARS
$151.7M
$129.0M
SKIL
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
TARS
TARS
+134.4% gap
TARS
128.4%
-6.0%
SKIL
Higher net margin
TARS
TARS
26.5% more per $
TARS
-5.5%
-32.0%
SKIL
More free cash flow
TARS
TARS
$32.3M more FCF
TARS
$13.0M
$-19.3M
SKIL
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
TARS
TARS
Annualised
TARS
134.4%
-3.2%
SKIL

Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
SKIL
SKIL
TARS
TARS
Revenue
$129.0M
$151.7M
Net Profit
$-41.3M
$-8.4M
Gross Margin
72.7%
Operating Margin
-26.6%
-5.3%
Net Margin
-32.0%
-5.5%
Revenue YoY
-6.0%
128.4%
Net Profit YoY
-74.9%
63.8%
EPS (diluted)
$-0.17

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
SKIL
SKIL
TARS
TARS
Q4 25
$129.0M
$151.7M
Q3 25
$128.8M
$118.7M
Q2 25
$124.2M
$102.7M
Q1 25
$133.8M
$78.3M
Q4 24
$137.2M
$66.4M
Q3 24
$132.2M
$48.1M
Q2 24
$127.8M
$40.8M
Q1 24
$137.5M
$27.6M
Net Profit
SKIL
SKIL
TARS
TARS
Q4 25
$-41.3M
$-8.4M
Q3 25
$-23.8M
$-12.6M
Q2 25
$-38.0M
$-20.3M
Q1 25
$-31.1M
$-25.1M
Q4 24
$-23.6M
$-23.1M
Q3 24
$-39.6M
$-23.4M
Q2 24
$-27.6M
$-33.3M
Q1 24
$-245.3M
$-35.7M
Gross Margin
SKIL
SKIL
TARS
TARS
Q4 25
72.7%
Q3 25
74.5%
Q2 25
74.0%
Q1 25
74.9%
Q4 24
75.0%
Q3 24
75.4%
Q2 24
73.0%
Q1 24
72.0%
Operating Margin
SKIL
SKIL
TARS
TARS
Q4 25
-26.6%
-5.3%
Q3 25
-9.2%
-12.2%
Q2 25
-14.6%
-21.6%
Q1 25
-12.9%
-33.5%
Q4 24
-6.7%
-36.8%
Q3 24
-14.6%
-52.3%
Q2 24
-18.6%
-81.6%
Q1 24
-165.8%
-136.5%
Net Margin
SKIL
SKIL
TARS
TARS
Q4 25
-32.0%
-5.5%
Q3 25
-18.5%
-10.6%
Q2 25
-30.6%
-19.8%
Q1 25
-23.3%
-32.1%
Q4 24
-17.2%
-34.8%
Q3 24
-29.9%
-48.7%
Q2 24
-21.6%
-81.6%
Q1 24
-178.4%
-129.4%
EPS (diluted)
SKIL
SKIL
TARS
TARS
Q4 25
$-0.17
Q3 25
$-0.30
Q2 25
$-0.48
Q1 25
$-0.64
Q4 24
$-0.57
Q3 24
$-0.61
Q2 24
$-0.88
Q1 24
$-1.01

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
SKIL
SKIL
TARS
TARS
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$74.6M
$417.3M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$570.2M
$72.4M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$4.0M
$343.4M
Total Assets
$897.6M
$562.2M
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
142.97×
0.21×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
SKIL
SKIL
TARS
TARS
Q4 25
$74.6M
$417.3M
Q3 25
$100.5M
$401.8M
Q2 25
$127.8M
$381.1M
Q1 25
$100.8M
$407.9M
Q4 24
$97.9M
$291.4M
Q3 24
$122.7M
$317.0M
Q2 24
$142.0M
$323.6M
Q1 24
$136.3M
$298.5M
Total Debt
SKIL
SKIL
TARS
TARS
Q4 25
$570.2M
$72.4M
Q3 25
$571.2M
$72.3M
Q2 25
$572.2M
$72.1M
Q1 25
$573.3M
$72.0M
Q4 24
$574.3M
$71.8M
Q3 24
$575.4M
$71.7M
Q2 24
$576.4M
$71.6M
Q1 24
$577.5M
$29.9M
Stockholders' Equity
SKIL
SKIL
TARS
TARS
Q4 25
$4.0M
$343.4M
Q3 25
$42.5M
$335.1M
Q2 25
$62.6M
$332.6M
Q1 25
$93.8M
$342.5M
Q4 24
$120.5M
$224.5M
Q3 24
$141.4M
$237.5M
Q2 24
$182.1M
$252.2M
Q1 24
$205.6M
$275.2M
Total Assets
SKIL
SKIL
TARS
TARS
Q4 25
$897.6M
$562.2M
Q3 25
$969.4M
$534.6M
Q2 25
$1.0B
$495.0M
Q1 25
$1.1B
$500.8M
Q4 24
$1.1B
$377.0M
Q3 24
$1.1B
$376.3M
Q2 24
$1.2B
$376.8M
Q1 24
$1.3B
$349.3M
Debt / Equity
SKIL
SKIL
TARS
TARS
Q4 25
142.97×
0.21×
Q3 25
13.45×
0.22×
Q2 25
9.13×
0.22×
Q1 25
6.11×
0.21×
Q4 24
4.77×
0.32×
Q3 24
4.07×
0.30×
Q2 24
3.16×
0.28×
Q1 24
2.81×
0.11×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
SKIL
SKIL
TARS
TARS
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$-18.9M
$19.3M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$-19.3M
$13.0M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
-15.0%
8.6%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
0.4%
4.2%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$10.0M
$-22.3M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
SKIL
SKIL
TARS
TARS
Q4 25
$-18.9M
$19.3M
Q3 25
$-17.8M
$18.3M
Q2 25
$31.3M
$-29.4M
Q1 25
$17.8M
$-20.7M
Q4 24
$8.7M
$-22.2M
Q3 24
$-11.4M
$-8.7M
Q2 24
$14.9M
$-14.4M
Q1 24
$11.5M
$-37.8M
Free Cash Flow
SKIL
SKIL
TARS
TARS
Q4 25
$-19.3M
$13.0M
Q3 25
$-18.5M
$16.3M
Q2 25
$30.8M
$-30.4M
Q1 25
$17.0M
$-21.2M
Q4 24
$8.3M
$-22.3M
Q3 24
$-11.7M
$-8.9M
Q2 24
$14.8M
$-15.4M
Q1 24
$11.1M
$-38.0M
FCF Margin
SKIL
SKIL
TARS
TARS
Q4 25
-15.0%
8.6%
Q3 25
-14.3%
13.8%
Q2 25
24.8%
-29.6%
Q1 25
12.7%
-27.1%
Q4 24
6.0%
-33.5%
Q3 24
-8.8%
-18.6%
Q2 24
11.6%
-37.8%
Q1 24
8.0%
-137.5%
Capex Intensity
SKIL
SKIL
TARS
TARS
Q4 25
0.4%
4.2%
Q3 25
0.5%
1.6%
Q2 25
0.4%
1.0%
Q1 25
0.6%
0.8%
Q4 24
0.3%
0.1%
Q3 24
0.2%
0.6%
Q2 24
0.1%
2.5%
Q1 24
0.3%
0.6%

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

SKIL
SKIL

SAAS And Subscription Services$93.5M73%
Virtual Ondemand And Classroom And Individualized Coaching$28.2M22%
Professional Services$7.3M6%

TARS
TARS

Segment breakdown not available.

Related Comparisons