vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of TANGER INC. (SKT) and Tecnoglass Inc. (TGLS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Tecnoglass Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($245.3M vs $151.0M, roughly 1.6× TANGER INC.). On growth, TANGER INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (14.2% vs 2.4%). Over the past eight quarters, Tecnoglass Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (12.8% CAGR vs 10.6%).
Tanger Inc. is a real estate investment trust headquartered in Greensboro, North Carolina, that invests in open air outlet and lifestyle shopping centers in the United States and Canada.
Tecnoglass Inc. is a leading manufacturer of high-performance architectural glass, aluminum windows, doors, and associated building components. It primarily caters to residential and commercial construction sectors across North America and Latin America, offering custom, energy-efficient solutions for new construction and renovation projects.
SKT vs TGLS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $151.0M | $245.3M |
| Net Profit | — | $26.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | 40.0% |
| Operating Margin | — | 18.3% |
| Net Margin | — | 10.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 14.2% | 2.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -44.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.57 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $151.0M | $245.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $145.2M | $260.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $140.7M | $255.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $135.4M | $222.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $132.2M | $239.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $133.0M | $238.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $129.0M | $219.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $123.4M | $192.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $26.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $32.0M | $47.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $30.1M | $44.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $19.2M | $42.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $47.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $24.9M | $49.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.8M | $35.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $22.4M | $29.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | 40.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 42.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 44.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 43.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 44.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 45.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 40.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 38.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | 18.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.1% | 25.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.1% | 24.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.0% | 26.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 28.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.8% | 28.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.8% | 23.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 16.9% | 21.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | 10.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.1% | 18.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.4% | 17.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.2% | 19.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 19.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.7% | 20.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.3% | 15.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 18.2% | 15.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.57 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.28 | $1.01 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.26 | $0.94 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.17 | $0.90 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.00 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.22 | $1.05 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.22 | $0.75 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.20 | $0.63 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $18.1M | $104.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $174.4M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $713.1M |
| Total Assets | — | $1.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.24× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $18.1M | $104.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.0M | $127.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.7M | $140.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.2M | $160.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $47.0M | $137.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.1M | $124.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.3M | $129.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $15.9M | $138.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $174.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | $114.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | $110.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $110.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | $111.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | $126.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $144.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.5B | $160.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $713.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $703.6M | $764.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $635.2M | $736.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $633.9M | $685.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $652.4M | $631.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $568.3M | $613.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $553.7M | $574.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $555.8M | $573.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.6B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5B | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.5B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4B | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.3B | $996.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.3B | $942.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.3B | $981.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.24× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.29× | 0.15× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.40× | 0.15× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.47× | 0.16× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.18× | 0.18× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.51× | 0.21× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.64× | 0.25× | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.65× | 0.28× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $31.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $11.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 4.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 8.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.19× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $34.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $31.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $74.3M | $40.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $82.0M | $17.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $41.4M | $46.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $61.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $65.2M | $41.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $72.8M | $34.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $31.1M | $33.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | $11.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $21.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-14.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $16.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $35.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $17.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $14.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $23.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | 4.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 8.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -5.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 7.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 14.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 7.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 6.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 12.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | 8.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 7.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 12.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 13.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 10.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 9.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 9.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 5.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.19× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.32× | 0.85× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.73× | 0.41× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.16× | 1.11× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.30× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.62× | 0.84× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.93× | 0.98× | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.39× | 1.13× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
SKT
Segment breakdown not available.
TGLS
| Product Sales | $164.2M | 67% |
| Fixed Price Contracts | $81.1M | 33% |
| Related Party | $692.0K | 0% |
