vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of TANGER INC. (SKT) and Vroom, Inc. (VRM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Vroom, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($235.9M vs $150.4M, roughly 1.6× TANGER INC.). TANGER INC. runs the higher net margin — 19.6% vs -59.8%, a 79.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Vroom, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (12.9% vs 11.1%). Over the past eight quarters, TANGER INC.'s revenue compounded faster (8.0% CAGR vs -49.5%).
Tanger Inc. is a real estate investment trust headquartered in Greensboro, North Carolina, that invests in open air outlet and lifestyle shopping centers in the United States and Canada.
Vroom, Inc. is a parent company of United Auto Credit Corporation (UACC) and CarStory. Previously, Vroom was a used car retailer and e-commerce company that let consumers buy, sell, and finance cars online. Vroom ceased e-commerce automotive sales operations on January 22, 2024.
SKT vs VRM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2023
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $150.4M | $235.9M |
| Net Profit | $29.4M | $-141.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | 12.3% |
| Operating Margin | — | -11.5% |
| Net Margin | 19.6% | -59.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 11.1% | 12.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | 47.1% | -669.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.05 | $-80.66 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $150.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $151.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $145.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $140.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $135.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $132.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $133.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $129.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | $29.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $32.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $30.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $19.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $24.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.8M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 20.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | 19.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 18.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.3% | — |
| Q1 26 | $1.05 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.28 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.26 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.17 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.22 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.22 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $227.4M | $135.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $454.2M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $697.8M | $127.7M |
| Total Assets | $2.8B | $1.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 3.56× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $227.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $18.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $47.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.3M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | — |
| Q1 26 | $697.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $703.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $635.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $633.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $652.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $568.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $553.7M | — |
| Q1 26 | $2.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.5B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.5B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.3B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.29× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.40× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.47× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.18× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.51× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.64× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-108.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-108.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -46.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 6.6% | 0.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-536.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $74.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $82.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $41.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $65.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $72.8M | — |
| Q1 26 | 6.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.32× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.73× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.16× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.62× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.93× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
SKT
| Rental revenue | $143.5M | 95% |
| Other revenue | $4.7M | 3% |
| Management, leasing and other services | $2.2M | 1% |
VRM
Segment breakdown not available.
