vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of SILICON LABORATORIES INC. (SLAB) and SCOTTS MIRACLE-GRO CO (SMG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SCOTTS MIRACLE-GRO CO is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($354.4M vs $208.2M, roughly 1.7× SILICON LABORATORIES INC.). On growth, SILICON LABORATORIES INC. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (25.2% vs -15.0%). SILICON LABORATORIES INC. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-1.6M vs $-390.4M). Over the past eight quarters, SILICON LABORATORIES INC.'s revenue compounded faster (39.9% CAGR vs -51.8%).
Silicon Laboratories, Inc., commonly referred to as Silicon Labs, is a fabless global technology company that designs and manufactures semiconductors, other silicon devices and software, which it sells to electronics design engineers and manufacturers in Internet of Things (IoT) infrastructure worldwide.
The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company is an American multinational corporation headquartered in Marysville, Ohio, where O.M. Scott began selling lawn seed in 1868. The company manufactures and sells consumer lawn, garden and pest control products, as well as soilless indoor gardening equipment. In the U.S., the company manufactures Scotts, Miracle-Gro and Ortho brands. It also markets and distributes the herbicide Roundup in the U.S. and several international markets including China.
SLAB vs SMG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $208.2M | $354.4M |
| Net Profit | — | $-125.0M |
| Gross Margin | 63.4% | 25.0% |
| Operating Margin | -1.6% | -6.2% |
| Net Margin | — | -35.3% |
| Revenue YoY | 25.2% | -15.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -79.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.07 | $-2.16 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $208.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $206.0M | $354.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $192.8M | $387.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $177.7M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $166.2M | $416.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $166.4M | $414.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $145.4M | $1.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-9.9M | $-125.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-21.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $149.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $217.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-69.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-28.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-82.2M | $132.1M |
| Q1 26 | 63.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 57.8% | 25.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 56.1% | 6.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 55.0% | 31.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 38.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 54.3% | 22.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 54.3% | -7.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 52.7% | 29.5% |
| Q1 26 | -1.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -6.0% | -6.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -11.9% | -38.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -18.1% | 18.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 24.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -17.2% | -12.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -17.9% | -52.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -33.0% | 16.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -4.8% | -35.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -11.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 12.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 15.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -16.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -17.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -56.5% | 11.0% |
| Q1 26 | $-0.07 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.30 | $-2.16 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.67 | $-2.58 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.94 | $2.54 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.72 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.72 | $-1.21 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.88 | $-4.21 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.56 | $2.28 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $443.6M | $8.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.1B | $-500.6M |
| Total Assets | $1.3B | $3.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $443.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $439.0M | $8.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $415.5M | $36.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $424.8M | $51.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $16.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $382.2M | $9.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $369.7M | $71.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $339.2M | $279.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $-500.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $-357.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $-170.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-290.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $-479.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $-390.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $-146.2M |
| Q1 26 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $3.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $3.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2B | $3.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.2B | $2.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | $3.5B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $8.3M | $-370.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-1.6M | $-390.4M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -0.8% | -110.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 4.8% | 5.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $65.8M | $358.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $8.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $34.3M | $-370.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.9M | $174.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $48.1M | $454.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $188.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $10.1M | $-445.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $31.6M | $118.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $16.1M | $588.0M |
| Q1 26 | $-1.6M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $27.9M | $-390.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.8M | $131.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $43.3M | $437.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $179.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.2M | $-474.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $29.4M | $101.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.6M | $574.8M |
| Q1 26 | -0.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 13.6% | -110.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.0% | 33.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 24.4% | 36.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 12.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.7% | -113.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.7% | 24.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.7% | 47.8% |
| Q1 26 | 4.8% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.1% | 5.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.5% | 11.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.7% | 1.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.4% | 7.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.3% | 4.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.4% | 1.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.05× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.86× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.45× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
SLAB
| Sales Channel Through Intermediary | $157.5M | 76% |
| Sales Channel Directly To Consumer | $50.7M | 24% |
SMG
| Growing Media And Mulch | $111.5M | 31% |
| Lawn Care | $109.5M | 31% |
| Controls | $59.8M | 17% |
| Other Products Primarily Gardening | $23.9M | 7% |
| Restated Marketing Agreement | $19.4M | 5% |
| Growingmedia | $12.6M | 4% |
| Otherprimarilygardeningandcontrols | $10.2M | 3% |
| Other | $7.5M | 2% |
