vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of SOLAI Ltd (SLAI) and CN Healthy Food Tech Group Corp. (UCFI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SOLAI Ltd is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($11.0M vs $7.9M, roughly 1.4× CN Healthy Food Tech Group Corp.). CN Healthy Food Tech Group Corp. runs the higher net margin — 42.3% vs -126.2%, a 168.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, CN Healthy Food Tech Group Corp. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (84.2% vs -43.1%). CN Healthy Food Tech Group Corp. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-4.1M vs $-17.0M).
SLAI vs UCFI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $11.0M | $7.9M |
| Net Profit | $-13.9M | $3.3M |
| Gross Margin | 0.1% | 70.4% |
| Operating Margin | -126.2% | 58.0% |
| Net Margin | -126.2% | 42.3% |
| Revenue YoY | -43.1% | 84.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -173.4% | 113.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.01 | $0.07 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q3 25 | — | $7.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.4M | — |
| Q3 25 | — | $3.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-13.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.9M | — |
| Q3 25 | — | 70.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 68.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 52.4% | — |
| Q3 25 | — | 58.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -126.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 53.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | -2.6% | — |
| Q3 25 | — | 42.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -126.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 36.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 97.9% | — |
| Q3 25 | — | $0.07 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.01 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.04 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.02 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.2M | $37.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $43.8M | $17.7M |
| Total Assets | $69.1M | $56.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | — | $37.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.1K | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.3M | — |
| Q3 25 | — | $17.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $43.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $9.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $45.9M | — |
| Q3 25 | — | $56.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $69.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $71.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $63.3M | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-17.0M | $-3.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-17.0M | $-4.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -154.2% | -51.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.0% | 5.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -1.09× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q3 25 | — | $-3.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-17.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $22.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-12.1M | — |
| Q3 25 | — | $-4.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-17.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | -51.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -154.2% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | 5.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q3 25 | — | -1.09× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 14.22× | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.64× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
SLAI
| Data center | $6.5M | 59% |
| Cryptocurrency mining | $4.6M | 41% |
UCFI
Segment breakdown not available.
