vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Simulations Plus, Inc. (SLP) and Velo3D, Inc. (VELO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Simulations Plus, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($18.4M vs $9.4M, roughly 2.0× Velo3D, Inc.). Simulations Plus, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 3.7% vs -231.9%, a 235.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Simulations Plus, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-2.7% vs -25.2%). Over the past eight quarters, Simulations Plus, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (0.3% CAGR vs -1.8%).

Simulations Plus, Inc. develops absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, and toxicity (ADMET) modeling and simulation software for the pharmaceutical and biotechnology, industrial chemicals, cosmetics, food ingredients, and herbicide industries. In September 2014, the company acquired Cognigen Corporation, a provider of clinical trial data analysis and consulting services.

Velo3D, Inc. develops and sells advanced end-to-end metal additive manufacturing (3D printing) solutions, comprising industrial-grade printers, specialized processing software, and high-performance metal materials. It primarily serves global aerospace, defense, energy, semiconductor and industrial manufacturing markets, enabling customers to produce complex, high-precision metal parts that are difficult to manufacture with traditional methods.

SLP vs VELO — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
SLP
SLP
2.0× larger
SLP
$18.4M
$9.4M
VELO
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
SLP
SLP
+22.6% gap
SLP
-2.7%
-25.2%
VELO
Higher net margin
SLP
SLP
235.6% more per $
SLP
3.7%
-231.9%
VELO
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
SLP
SLP
Annualised
SLP
0.3%
-1.8%
VELO

Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
SLP
SLP
VELO
VELO
Revenue
$18.4M
$9.4M
Net Profit
$676.0K
$-21.9M
Gross Margin
59.1%
-73.6%
Operating Margin
3.9%
-231.0%
Net Margin
3.7%
-231.9%
Revenue YoY
-2.7%
-25.2%
Net Profit YoY
228.2%
-2.9%
EPS (diluted)
$0.03
$-0.87

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
SLP
SLP
VELO
VELO
Q4 25
$18.4M
$9.4M
Q3 25
$17.5M
$13.6M
Q2 25
$20.4M
$13.6M
Q1 25
$22.4M
$9.3M
Q4 24
$18.9M
$12.6M
Q3 24
$18.7M
$8.2M
Q2 24
$18.5M
$10.3M
Q1 24
$18.3M
$9.8M
Net Profit
SLP
SLP
VELO
VELO
Q4 25
$676.0K
$-21.9M
Q3 25
$-681.0K
$-11.2M
Q2 25
$-67.3M
$-13.3M
Q1 25
$3.1M
$-25.0M
Q4 24
$206.0K
$-21.3M
Q3 24
$843.0K
$-21.9M
Q2 24
$3.1M
$935.0K
Q1 24
$4.0M
$-27.5M
Gross Margin
SLP
SLP
VELO
VELO
Q4 25
59.1%
-73.6%
Q3 25
56.4%
3.2%
Q2 25
64.0%
-11.7%
Q1 25
58.5%
7.5%
Q4 24
54.0%
-3.5%
Q3 24
36.6%
49.4%
Q2 24
71.5%
-28.0%
Q1 24
72.2%
-28.8%
Operating Margin
SLP
SLP
VELO
VELO
Q4 25
3.9%
-231.0%
Q3 25
3.8%
-73.3%
Q2 25
-364.5%
-85.4%
Q1 25
12.1%
-123.6%
Q4 24
0.7%
-167.0%
Q3 24
-6.2%
-213.8%
Q2 24
10.1%
-187.7%
Q1 24
24.3%
-211.1%
Net Margin
SLP
SLP
VELO
VELO
Q4 25
3.7%
-231.9%
Q3 25
-3.9%
-82.0%
Q2 25
-330.6%
-97.7%
Q1 25
13.7%
-268.4%
Q4 24
1.1%
-168.5%
Q3 24
4.5%
-265.3%
Q2 24
16.9%
9.0%
Q1 24
22.0%
-281.2%
EPS (diluted)
SLP
SLP
VELO
VELO
Q4 25
$0.03
$-0.87
Q3 25
$-0.03
$-0.65
Q2 25
$-3.35
$-0.94
Q1 25
$0.15
$-1.87
Q4 24
$0.01
$7.06
Q3 24
$0.04
$-35.52
Q2 24
$0.15
$1.65
Q1 24
$0.20
$-55.51

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
SLP
SLP
VELO
VELO
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$35.7M
$39.0M
Total DebtLower is stronger
$31.0M
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$127.1M
$38.2M
Total Assets
$137.8M
$105.3M
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage
0.81×

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
SLP
SLP
VELO
VELO
Q4 25
$35.7M
$39.0M
Q3 25
$32.4M
$11.8M
Q2 25
$28.4M
$854.0K
Q1 25
$21.4M
$3.9M
Q4 24
$18.2M
$1.2M
Q3 24
$20.3M
$1.6M
Q2 24
$119.0M
$3.2M
Q1 24
$108.5M
$10.9M
Total Debt
SLP
SLP
VELO
VELO
Q4 25
$31.0M
Q3 25
$23.0M
Q2 25
$22.5M
Q1 25
$21.7M
Q4 24
$5.7M
Q3 24
$32.3M
Q2 24
$33.5M
Q1 24
$44.0M
Stockholders' Equity
SLP
SLP
VELO
VELO
Q4 25
$127.1M
$38.2M
Q3 25
$124.8M
$29.9M
Q2 25
$123.8M
$21.4M
Q1 25
$189.5M
$32.8M
Q4 24
$184.7M
$39.7M
Q3 24
$182.4M
$34.4M
Q2 24
$180.9M
$52.1M
Q1 24
$177.0M
$45.5M
Total Assets
SLP
SLP
VELO
VELO
Q4 25
$137.8M
$105.3M
Q3 25
$131.9M
$93.7M
Q2 25
$134.4M
$78.4M
Q1 25
$201.4M
$91.3M
Q4 24
$196.9M
$89.2M
Q3 24
$196.6M
$110.8M
Q2 24
$192.7M
$116.7M
Q1 24
$194.0M
$136.1M
Debt / Equity
SLP
SLP
VELO
VELO
Q4 25
0.81×
Q3 25
0.77×
Q2 25
1.05×
Q1 25
0.66×
Q4 24
0.14×
Q3 24
0.94×
Q2 24
0.64×
Q1 24
0.97×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
SLP
SLP
VELO
VELO
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$4.2M
$-7.7M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$-8.3M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
-88.3%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
0.0%
6.4%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
6.26×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
SLP
SLP
VELO
VELO
Q4 25
$4.2M
$-7.7M
Q3 25
$5.6M
$-6.0M
Q2 25
$8.1M
$-1.2M
Q1 25
$5.7M
$-12.3M
Q4 24
$-1.3M
$-2.2M
Q3 24
$1.7M
$-2.0M
Q2 24
$5.7M
$-8.0M
Q1 24
$5.8M
$-20.5M
Free Cash Flow
SLP
SLP
VELO
VELO
Q4 25
$-8.3M
Q3 25
$5.3M
$-6.3M
Q2 25
$7.8M
$-3.0M
Q1 25
$5.6M
Q4 24
$-1.4M
$-2.2M
Q3 24
$1.6M
$-2.0M
Q2 24
$5.6M
$-8.0M
Q1 24
$5.4M
$-20.5M
FCF Margin
SLP
SLP
VELO
VELO
Q4 25
-88.3%
Q3 25
30.5%
-46.5%
Q2 25
38.5%
-22.2%
Q1 25
25.0%
Q4 24
-7.2%
-17.7%
Q3 24
8.8%
-24.2%
Q2 24
30.0%
-77.1%
Q1 24
29.4%
-209.8%
Capex Intensity
SLP
SLP
VELO
VELO
Q4 25
0.0%
6.4%
Q3 25
1.5%
2.3%
Q2 25
1.5%
13.3%
Q1 25
0.3%
0.0%
Q4 24
0.5%
0.2%
Q3 24
0.1%
0.2%
Q2 24
0.6%
0.0%
Q1 24
2.4%
0.1%
Cash Conversion
SLP
SLP
VELO
VELO
Q4 25
6.26×
Q3 25
Q2 25
Q1 25
1.84×
Q4 24
-6.18×
Q3 24
1.97×
Q2 24
1.81×
-8.52×
Q1 24
1.44×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

SLP
SLP

Services Segment$9.5M52%
Development$7.2M39%
Discovery$1.3M7%

VELO
VELO

Segment breakdown not available.

Related Comparisons