vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of SEACOR Marine Holdings Inc. (SMHI) and TELOS CORP (TLS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SEACOR Marine Holdings Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($52.3M vs $46.8M, roughly 1.1× TELOS CORP). SEACOR Marine Holdings Inc. runs the higher net margin — -27.9% vs -34.9%, a 6.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, TELOS CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (77.4% vs -25.0%). TELOS CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($8.0M vs $-20.6M). Over the past eight quarters, TELOS CORP's revenue compounded faster (25.7% CAGR vs -8.7%).
SEACOR Holdings, based in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, provides equipment and services to the offshore petroleum industry and the marine transportation industry. An American corporation, the company holds a 70% ownership stake in a bioethanol plant located in Illinois.
Telos Corporation is an information technology and cybersecurity company located in Ashburn, Virginia. Telos primarily serves government and enterprise clients, receiving a large number of its contracts from the United States Department of Defense. Customers are primarily military, intelligence and civilian agencies of the US government and NATO allies.
SMHI vs TLS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $52.3M | $46.8M |
| Net Profit | $-14.6M | $-16.3M |
| Gross Margin | 18.5% | 35.0% |
| Operating Margin | -9.9% | -39.6% |
| Net Margin | -27.9% | -34.9% |
| Revenue YoY | -25.0% | 77.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 44.2% | -74.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.59 | $-0.22 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $52.3M | $46.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $59.2M | $51.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $60.8M | $36.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $55.5M | $30.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $69.8M | $26.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $68.9M | $23.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $69.9M | $28.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $62.8M | $29.6M |
| Q4 25 | $-14.6M | $-16.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.0M | $-2.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-6.7M | $-9.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-15.5M | $-8.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-26.2M | $-9.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-16.3M | $-28.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-12.5M | $-7.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-23.1M | $-7.4M |
| Q4 25 | 18.5% | 35.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.4% | 39.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.6% | 33.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 24.5% | 39.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 33.1% | 40.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.2% | 13.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 29.1% | 34.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 23.4% | 37.0% |
| Q4 25 | -9.9% | -39.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 30.5% | -4.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.0% | -27.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -9.5% | -29.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.2% | -37.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -9.4% | -121.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -5.6% | -30.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -16.9% | -28.5% |
| Q4 25 | -27.9% | -34.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.2% | -4.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -11.1% | -26.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -27.9% | -28.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -37.6% | -35.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -23.7% | -118.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -17.9% | -27.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -36.8% | -24.9% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.59 | $-0.22 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.35 | $-0.03 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.26 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.56 | $-0.12 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.94 | $-0.13 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.59 | $-0.39 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.45 | $-0.11 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.84 | $-0.10 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $68.9M | $53.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $264.4M | $96.0M |
| Total Assets | $660.6M | $139.9M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $68.9M | $53.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $91.0M | $59.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $34.4M | $57.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $43.0M | $57.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $59.5M | $54.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $35.6M | $69.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $40.6M | $80.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $59.6M | $93.9M |
| Q4 25 | $264.4M | $96.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $277.3M | $119.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $267.5M | $118.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $283.7M | $126.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $298.0M | $127.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $324.7M | $129.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $337.6M | $149.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $348.5M | $154.4M |
| Q4 25 | $660.6M | $139.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $692.5M | $164.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $680.0M | $165.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $694.2M | $158.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $727.1M | $158.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $709.4M | $166.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $721.6M | $182.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $744.8M | $195.4M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-12.2M | $8.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-20.6M | $8.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -39.4% | 17.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 16.1% | 0.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-85.2M | $29.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-12.2M | $8.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-10.7M | $9.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.1M | $7.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-11.5M | $6.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.5M | $-10.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $626.0K | $-7.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-12.2M | $-8.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-7.2M | $-350.0K |
| Q4 25 | $-20.6M | $8.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-20.0M | $8.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-12.3M | $6.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-32.3M | $6.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.5M | $-12.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $416.0K | $-7.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-12.9M | $-8.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-10.6M | $-447.0K |
| Q4 25 | -39.4% | 17.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -33.8% | 16.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -20.2% | 19.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -58.1% | 19.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.9% | -47.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.6% | -30.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -18.5% | -28.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -16.9% | -1.5% |
| Q4 25 | 16.1% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.8% | 0.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.8% | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 37.5% | 0.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.3% | 7.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.3% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.9% | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.4% | 0.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.19× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
SMHI
Segment breakdown not available.
TLS
| Security Solutions Segment | $44.8M | 96% |
| Secure Networks Segment | $1.9M | 4% |
