vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of SMITH MIDLAND CORP (SMID) and UNION BANKSHARES INC (UNB). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SMITH MIDLAND CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($23.1M vs $14.1M, roughly 1.6× UNION BANKSHARES INC). On growth, SMITH MIDLAND CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (24.7% vs 6.3%). Over the past eight quarters, SMITH MIDLAND CORP's revenue compounded faster (17.4% CAGR vs 10.2%).
Smith Midland Corp is a specialized manufacturer of precast concrete products for infrastructure, commercial, residential and industrial construction uses. Its key product lines include highway safety barriers, acoustic sound walls, architectural precast panels, and stormwater management systems, serving primarily the North American market with durable, sustainable construction solutions.
Atlantic Union Bankshares Corporation is a bank holding company based in Richmond, Virginia and is the parent company of Atlantic Union Bank, a regional bank. It operates 129 branches in Virginia, Maryland, and North Carolina and is the largest bank headquartered in Virginia. It is on the list of largest banks in the United States.
SMID vs UNB — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $23.1M | $14.1M |
| Net Profit | $2.1M | — |
| Gross Margin | 57.5% | — |
| Operating Margin | 37.8% | — |
| Net Margin | 9.2% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 24.7% | 6.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 52.5% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.41 | $0.59 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $23.1M | $14.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $21.5M | $14.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $26.2M | $13.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $22.7M | $12.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $18.5M | $13.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $23.6M | $11.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.6M | $12.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $16.8M | $11.6M |
| Q4 25 | $2.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.9M | $3.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.2M | $2.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.3M | $2.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.1M | $1.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.0M | $2.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1M | $2.4M |
| Q4 25 | 57.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 26.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 30.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 51.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 23.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | 37.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | 9.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.4% | 23.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.9% | 18.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.7% | 19.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.4% | 12.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.1% | 16.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 6.8% | 20.9% |
| Q4 25 | $0.41 | $0.59 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.54 | $0.75 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.79 | $0.52 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.62 | $0.55 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.28 | $0.65 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.59 | $0.29 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.37 | $0.45 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.21 | $0.53 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $54.3M | $80.9M |
| Total Assets | $87.7M | $1.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $54.3M | $80.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $52.1M | $77.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $49.2M | $71.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $45.1M | $70.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $41.7M | $66.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $40.3M | $72.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $37.2M | $64.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $35.3M | $63.8M |
| Q4 25 | $87.7M | $1.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $85.4M | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | $81.2K | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $74.7M | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $68.0M | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $66.6M | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $64.0M | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $64.9M | $1.4B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $17.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $16.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 113.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 8.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $29.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $17.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.7M | $9.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $288.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.2M | $4.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-645.0K | $12.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.9M | $1.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7M | $3.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-777.0K | $1.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $16.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.3M | $9.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-381.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6M | $3.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.3M | $11.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.8M | $1.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $998.0K | $2.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.6M | $1.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | 113.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 29.5% | 65.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -2.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.1% | 30.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -7.0% | 83.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.8% | 9.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.1% | 23.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -15.3% | 12.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | 8.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.1% | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 5.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.6% | 1.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.6% | 8.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 8.6% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.7% | 2.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.7% | 3.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.07× | 2.83× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.12× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.67× | 1.62× | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.46× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.23× | 0.97× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.37× | 1.61× | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.68× | 0.77× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
SMID
| Product Sales | $13.8M | 60% |
| Service Revenue | $9.3M | 40% |
UNB
Segment breakdown not available.
