vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of STANDARD MOTOR PRODUCTS, INC. (SMP) and StepStone Group Inc. (STEP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
StepStone Group Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($586.5M vs $385.1M, roughly 1.5× STANDARD MOTOR PRODUCTS, INC.). STANDARD MOTOR PRODUCTS, INC. runs the higher net margin — 2.0% vs -21.0%, a 23.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, StepStone Group Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (73.0% vs 12.2%). StepStone Group Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($26.7M vs $-37.6M). Over the past eight quarters, StepStone Group Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (28.2% CAGR vs 7.8%).
Standard Motor Products, Inc. is a manufacturer and distributor of automotive parts. The company was founded in 1919 as a partnership by Elias Fife and Ralph Van Allen and incorporated by Fife in 1926. It is headquartered in Long Island City, New York, and trades on the New York Stock Exchange. SMP includes four operational segments: Vehicle Control, Temperature Control, Engineered Solutions and Nissens. SMP’s Vehicle Control and Temperature Control divisions supply automotive aftermarket com...
Rosetta Stone Inc. is an American education technology software company that develops language, literacy and brain-fitness software. Best known for its language-learning products, in 2013, the company expanded beyond language into education-technology with its acquisitions of Livemocha, Lexia Learning, Fit Brains, and Tell Me More. In 2021, it became a subsidiary of IXL Learning.
SMP vs STEP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $385.1M | $586.5M |
| Net Profit | $7.9M | $-123.5M |
| Gross Margin | 31.7% | — |
| Operating Margin | 5.6% | -33.2% |
| Net Margin | 2.0% | -21.0% |
| Revenue YoY | 12.2% | 73.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 457.9% | 35.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.34 | $-1.55 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $385.1M | $586.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $498.8M | $454.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $493.9M | $364.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $413.4M | $377.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $343.4M | $339.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $399.3M | $271.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $389.8M | $186.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $331.4M | $356.8M |
| Q4 25 | $7.9M | $-123.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.3M | $-366.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $25.2M | $-38.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $12.6M | $-18.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.2M | $-192.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.8M | $17.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.1M | $13.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $8.8M | $30.8M |
| Q4 25 | 31.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 32.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 30.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 30.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 29.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 28.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 27.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | 5.6% | -33.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.5% | -148.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.7% | -5.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 5.9% | 2.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.1% | -101.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.3% | 21.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.4% | 29.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.4% | 26.5% |
| Q4 25 | 2.0% | -21.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.9% | -80.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.1% | -10.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.0% | -4.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.6% | -56.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.0% | 6.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.4% | 7.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.7% | 8.6% |
| Q4 25 | $0.34 | $-1.55 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.19 | $-4.66 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.13 | $-0.49 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.56 | $-0.37 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.09 | $-2.61 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.17 | $0.26 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.77 | $0.20 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.39 | $0.47 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $618.7M | $270.2M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $683.7M | $-378.8M |
| Total Assets | $2.0B | $5.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.90× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $87.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $58.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $50.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $44.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $26.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $26.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $27.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | $618.7M | $270.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $589.5M | $269.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $636.6M | $269.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $650.6M | $269.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $562.3M | $168.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $142.8M | $172.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $208.2M | $172.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $214.9M | $148.8M |
| Q4 25 | $683.7M | $-378.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $677.4M | $-233.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $688.6M | $153.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $638.0M | $179.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $615.7M | $209.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $638.8M | $397.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $640.0M | $366.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $639.1M | $324.5M |
| Q4 25 | $2.0B | $5.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0B | $5.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.0B | $4.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | $4.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $4.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.4B | $3.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.4B | $3.8B |
| Q4 25 | 0.90× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.87× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.92× | 1.75× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.02× | 1.50× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.91× | 0.81× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.22× | 0.43× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.33× | 0.47× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.34× | 0.46× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-28.2M | $27.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-37.6M | $26.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -9.8% | 4.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.4% | 0.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | -3.59× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $18.7M | $18.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-28.2M | $27.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $91.6M | $16.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $54.3M | $46.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-60.2M | $-66.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.5M | $27.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $88.3M | $53.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $35.6M | $50.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-45.7M | $7.6M |
| Q4 25 | $-37.6M | $26.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $81.5M | $15.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $44.2M | $45.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-69.4M | $-69.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-11.4M | $27.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $77.1M | $52.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $22.7M | $49.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-55.8M | $6.7M |
| Q4 25 | -9.8% | 4.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.3% | 3.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 8.9% | 12.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -16.8% | -18.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | -3.3% | 8.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.3% | 19.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.8% | 26.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -16.8% | 1.9% |
| Q4 25 | 2.4% | 0.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.0% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.1% | 0.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.2% | 0.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.9% | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.8% | 0.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.3% | 0.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.0% | 0.3% |
| Q4 25 | -3.59× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.15× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.79× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.19× | 3.05× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.09× | 3.76× | ||
| Q1 24 | -5.18× | 0.25× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
SMP
| Engineered Solutions | $66.1M | 17% |
| Electrical And Safety | $63.6M | 17% |
| Temperature Control | $61.5M | 16% |
| Europe Excluding Poland | $55.5M | 14% |
| Other Thermal Components | $30.7M | 8% |
| Air Conditioning | $22.7M | 6% |
| Commercial Vehicle | $19.7M | 5% |
| All Other | $18.9M | 5% |
| PL | $16.0M | 4% |
| Wire Sets And Other | $11.9M | 3% |
| Engine Efficiency | $10.0M | 3% |
| Construction Agriculture | $7.8M | 2% |
STEP
| Other | $210.1M | 36% |
| Management And Advisory Fees Net Focused Commingled Funds | $143.3M | 24% |
| Carried Interest Allocation Focused Commingled Funds | $85.1M | 15% |
| Carried Interest Allocation Separately Managed Accounts | $63.6M | 11% |
| Carried Interest Allocation Realized | $46.7M | 8% |
| Management And Advisory Fees Net Advisory And Other Services | $18.3M | 3% |
| Legacy Carried Interest Allocation Focused Commingled Funds | $10.3M | 2% |
| Income Based Incentive Fees | $6.0M | 1% |
| Management And Advisory Fees Net Fund Reimbursement Revenues | $3.1M | 1% |
