vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Simply Good Foods Co (SMPL) and TreeHouse Foods, Inc. (THS), based on the latest 10-Q / 10-K filings. Click either name above to swap in a different company.
TreeHouse Foods, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($840.3M vs $340.2M, roughly 2.5× Simply Good Foods Co). Simply Good Foods Co runs the higher net margin — 7.4% vs -31.6%, a 39.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, TreeHouse Foods, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (0.1% vs -0.3%). Over the past eight quarters, Simply Good Foods Co's revenue compounded faster (5.0% CAGR vs -3.9%).
Whole Foods Market, Inc. is an American multinational supermarket chain headquartered in Austin, Texas, owned wholly by Amazon, and which generally sells whole food products free from hydrogenated fats and artificial colors, flavors, and preservatives. A USDA Certified Organic grocer in the United States, the chain is popularly known for its organic selections.
TreeHouse Foods Inc. is a multinational food processing company specializing in producing private label packaged foods headquartered in Oak Brook, Illinois. Created in 2005 and consisting entirely of acquisitions, in 2010 the company had sales of $2 billion and employed over 4,000 people at 20 facilities. Food Processing magazine named TreeHouse Foods their 2010 Processor of the Year, calling them "the biggest company you never heard of". In 2015, the company was the 37th-largest food and bev...
SMPL vs THS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 2026 vs Q3 2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $340.2M | $840.3M |
| Net Profit | $25.3M | $-265.8M |
| Gross Margin | 32.3% | 18.8% |
| Operating Margin | 11.0% | -30.2% |
| Net Margin | 7.4% | -31.6% |
| Revenue YoY | -0.3% | 0.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | -33.7% | -7717.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.26 | $-5.26 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align — see 8-quarter trend below.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history — bar widths are scaled to the larger of the two companies so you can eyeball the size gap and growth trajectory without doing math. Quarters aligned by calendar period (report date) so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $340.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $840.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $381.0M | $798.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $792.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $341.3M | $905.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $375.7M | $839.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $334.8M | $788.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $312.2M | $820.7M |
| Q4 25 | $25.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-265.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $41.1M | $-2.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-31.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $38.1M | $58.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $29.3M | $-3.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $41.3M | $-16.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $33.1M | $-11.7M |
| Q4 25 | 32.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 18.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 36.4% | 17.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 14.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 38.2% | 19.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 38.8% | 15.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 39.9% | 16.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 37.4% | 13.6% |
| Q4 25 | 11.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -30.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.6% | 3.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -0.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 16.0% | 8.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.7% | 3.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 17.6% | -0.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 15.4% | -0.6% |
| Q4 25 | 7.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -31.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.8% | -0.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -4.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.2% | 6.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.8% | -0.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.3% | -2.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 10.6% | -1.4% |
| Q4 25 | $0.26 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-5.26 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.40 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.63 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.38 | $1.12 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.29 | $-0.07 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.41 | $-0.32 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.33 | $-0.22 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest filing — the kind of financial-strength check premium terminals charge for.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $194.1M | $21.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $1.5B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.7B | $1.3B |
| Total Assets | $2.5B | $3.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.18× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $194.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $21.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $98.0M | $17.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $16.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $121.8M | $289.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $132.5M | $102.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $208.7M | $105.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $135.9M | $191.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $397.5M | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $237.7M | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $237.7M | $1.4B |
| Q4 25 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.8B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.8B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.6B | $1.6B |
| Q4 25 | $2.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.4B | $4.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4B | $4.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.4B | $4.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.2B | $3.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.1B | $4.0B |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.18× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.98× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.93× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.90× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.23× | 0.90× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.14× | 0.90× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.14× | 0.87× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Net income can be massaged; cash flow is harder to fake.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $50.1M | $38.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $48.0M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 14.1% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue; lower = less reinvestment burden | 0.6% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit; >1× = earnings back up with cash | 1.98× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $50.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $38.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-47.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-53.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $32.0M | $296.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $48.9M | $41.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $72.8M | $-19.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $46.5M | $-52.4M |
| Q4 25 | $48.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $31.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $45.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $72.0M | $-42.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $46.1M | $-80.7M |
| Q4 25 | 14.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.5% | -5.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 14.8% | -9.8% |
| Q4 25 | 0.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.2% | 2.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.1% | 3.4% |
| Q4 25 | 1.98× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.84× | 5.05× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.67× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.76× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.40× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Sankey diagram of revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company. Charts shown full-width and stacked so both segment hierarchies are readable side-by-side on desktop and mobile.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
SMPL
| Quest | $211.4M | 62% |
| Atkins Domain | $79.7M | 23% |
| OWYN | $28.1M | 8% |
| Other | $20.9M | 6% |
THS
| Retail Grocery Customers | $670.6M | 80% |
| Food Away From Home And Other | $85.3M | 10% |
| Co Manufacturing | $84.4M | 10% |
