vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Snail, Inc. (SNAL) and Venus Concept Inc. (VERO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Snail, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($25.1M vs $13.8M, roughly 1.8× Venus Concept Inc.). Snail, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -3.4% vs -163.8%, a 160.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Snail, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-4.2% vs -8.2%). Over the past eight quarters, Snail, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (33.4% CAGR vs -12.8%).
Suzhou Snail Digital Technology Co., Ltd., doing business as Snail, is a Chinese video game company and a Virtual Network Operator headquartered in Suzhou, China, which has branches Snail Games and Snail Mobile. Its division, Snail USA, markets Snail Games products in North America, South America, & Europe. Snail Games products include massively multiplayer online (MMOs), real-time strategy (RTS), and casual games. Its global registered user base has reached over 70 million accounts. The U.S....
Venus Concept Inc is a global medical technology firm specializing in the development, manufacturing, and distribution of non-invasive and minimally invasive aesthetic medical devices. Its product portfolio covers hair removal, skin rejuvenation, body contouring, and anti-aging solutions, serving dermatology clinics, plastic surgery centers, and medical spas across North America, Europe, and Asia Pacific markets.
SNAL vs VERO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $25.1M | $13.8M |
| Net Profit | $-862.2K | $-22.6M |
| Gross Margin | 38.3% | 64.0% |
| Operating Margin | -6.0% | -68.9% |
| Net Margin | -3.4% | -163.8% |
| Revenue YoY | -4.2% | -8.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -177.0% | -143.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-12.14 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $25.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.8M | $13.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $22.2M | $15.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $20.1M | $13.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $26.2M | $15.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.5M | $15.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.6M | $16.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $14.1M | $17.5M |
| Q4 25 | $-862.2K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-7.9M | $-22.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-16.6M | $-11.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.9M | $-12.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1M | $-8.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $235.1K | $-9.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.3M | $-20.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.8M | $-9.8M |
| Q4 25 | 38.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.1% | 64.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.3% | 60.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 29.1% | 64.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 43.3% | 69.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 38.6% | 66.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 37.5% | 71.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 14.7% | 66.6% |
| Q4 25 | -6.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -71.3% | -68.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -8.2% | -57.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -20.4% | -69.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.5% | -42.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.8% | -47.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.4% | -33.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -15.6% | -44.4% |
| Q4 25 | -3.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -56.9% | -163.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -74.7% | -74.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -9.7% | -90.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.3% | -50.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.0% | -61.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.4% | -120.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -12.6% | -56.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-12.14 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.44 | $-8.03 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.06 | $-17.44 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.03 | $-10.26 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.01 | $-13.10 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.06 | $-30.93 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.05 | $-16.92 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $8.6M | $4.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $14.6M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-16.4M | $2.7M |
| Total Assets | $59.3M | $61.6M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $8.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.3M | $4.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.9M | $3.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.4M | $3.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.3M | $4.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.6M | $4.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.5M | $5.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $16.1M | $5.1M |
| Q4 25 | $14.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-16.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-15.6M | $2.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-8.0M | $2.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.1M | $2.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.7M | $2.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.2M | $10.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.9M | $3.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.6M | $-22.5M |
| Q4 25 | $59.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $51.1M | $61.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $58.0M | $63.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $64.5M | $63.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $62.2M | $68.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $66.8M | $72.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $75.4M | $79.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $78.3M | $85.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.99× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.59× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.70× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.73× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.16× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-5.3M | $-4.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-4.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -35.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-20.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-5.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.6M | $-4.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.2M | $-5.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $764.5K | $-6.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.6M | $-3.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-5.0M | $-3.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $206.6K | $-1.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.8M | $-2.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-4.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-5.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-6.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-3.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-3.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-1.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-2.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -35.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -35.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -46.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -24.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -20.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -8.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -16.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -3.21× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -21.05× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.09× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
SNAL
| Pc | $14.7M | 59% |
| Platform Three | $5.2M | 21% |
| Platform Two | $3.3M | 13% |
| Sales Channel Directly To Consumer Mobile Sale | $1.6M | 6% |
VERO
| Products And Services | $10.8M | 79% |
| Leases | $2.9M | 21% |
