vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Snail, Inc. (SNAL) and YORK WATER CO (YORW). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Snail, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($25.1M vs $19.4M, roughly 1.3× YORK WATER CO). YORK WATER CO runs the higher net margin — 26.7% vs -3.4%, a 30.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, YORK WATER CO posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (3.2% vs -4.2%). Over the past eight quarters, Snail, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (33.4% CAGR vs 5.1%).
Suzhou Snail Digital Technology Co., Ltd., doing business as Snail, is a Chinese video game company and a Virtual Network Operator headquartered in Suzhou, China, which has branches Snail Games and Snail Mobile. Its division, Snail USA, markets Snail Games products in North America, South America, & Europe. Snail Games products include massively multiplayer online (MMOs), real-time strategy (RTS), and casual games. Its global registered user base has reached over 70 million accounts. The U.S....
The York Water Company is an investor-owned, public utility company based in York, Pennsylvania and operating throughout Pennsylvania. The company was founded in 1816 by a group of local businessmen concerned about fire protection.
SNAL vs YORW — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $25.1M | $19.4M |
| Net Profit | $-862.2K | $5.2M |
| Gross Margin | 38.3% | — |
| Operating Margin | -6.0% | 33.2% |
| Net Margin | -3.4% | 26.7% |
| Revenue YoY | -4.2% | 3.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -177.0% | 0.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.36 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $25.1M | $19.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $13.8M | $20.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $22.2M | $19.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $20.1M | $18.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $26.2M | $18.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.5M | $19.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $21.6M | $18.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $14.1M | $17.5M |
| Q4 25 | $-862.2K | $5.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-7.9M | $6.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-16.6M | $5.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.9M | $3.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1M | $5.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $235.1K | $5.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.3M | $5.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.8M | $4.3M |
| Q4 25 | 38.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 29.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 43.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 38.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 37.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 14.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | -6.0% | 33.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -71.3% | 39.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -8.2% | 37.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | -20.4% | 34.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.5% | 35.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.8% | 41.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.4% | 37.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -15.6% | 35.5% |
| Q4 25 | -3.4% | 26.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -56.9% | 30.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -74.7% | 26.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -9.7% | 19.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.3% | 27.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.0% | 29.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.4% | 26.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | -12.6% | 24.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.36 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.43 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.44 | $0.35 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.06 | $0.25 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.03 | $0.36 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.01 | $0.41 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.06 | $0.35 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.05 | $0.30 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $8.6M | $1.0K |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $14.6M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $-16.4M | $240.3M |
| Total Assets | $59.3M | $680.9M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $8.6M | $1.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.3M | $1.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.9M | $1.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.4M | $1.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.3M | $1.0K | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.6M | $1.0K | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.5M | $1.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $16.1M | $3.3M |
| Q4 25 | $14.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-16.4M | $240.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-15.6M | $238.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-8.0M | $234.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.1M | $232.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.7M | $231.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.2M | $228.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.9M | $225.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.6M | $222.9M |
| Q4 25 | $59.3M | $680.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $51.1M | $667.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $58.0M | $653.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $64.5M | $641.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $62.2M | $633.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $66.8M | $621.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $75.4M | $610.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $78.3M | $602.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.99× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.59× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.70× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.73× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.16× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-5.3M | $8.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.63× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-5.3M | $8.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.6M | $7.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.2M | $7.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $764.5K | $6.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.6M | $10.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-5.0M | $7.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $206.6K | $6.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.8M | $6.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.63× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.26× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.50× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.65× | ||
| Q4 24 | -3.21× | 1.98× | ||
| Q3 24 | -21.05× | 1.29× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.09× | 1.34× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.42× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
SNAL
| Pc | $14.7M | 59% |
| Platform Three | $5.2M | 21% |
| Platform Two | $3.3M | 13% |
| Sales Channel Directly To Consumer Mobile Sale | $1.6M | 6% |
YORW
Segment breakdown not available.
