vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Synopsys (SNPS) and TELUS CORP (TU). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
TELUS CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.7B vs $2.3B, roughly 1.6× Synopsys). Synopsys runs the higher net margin — 19.9% vs -4.8%, a 24.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Synopsys posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (50.6% vs 2.2%).
Synopsys, Inc. is an American multinational electronic design automation (EDA) company headquartered in Sunnyvale, California, that focuses on design and verification of silicon chips, electronic system-level design and verification, and reusable components. Synopsys supplies tools and services to the semiconductor design and manufacturing industry.
TELUS CORPTUEarnings & Financial Report
Telus Corporation is a Canadian publicly traded holding company and conglomerate, headquartered in Vancouver, British Columbia, which is the parent company of several subsidiaries: Telus Communications offers telephony, television, data and Internet services; Telus Mobility offers wireless services; Telus Health operates companies that provide health products and services; and Telus Digital operates worldwide, providing multilingual customer service outsourcing and digital IT services. Telus ...
SNPS vs TU — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.3B | $3.7B |
| Net Profit | $448.7M | $-178.8M |
| Gross Margin | 71.0% | 90.2% |
| Operating Margin | 5.4% | 3.4% |
| Net Margin | 19.9% | -4.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 50.6% | 2.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -59.7% | -210.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.44 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | $3.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $3.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.6B | — |
| Q4 25 | $448.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $242.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $345.3M | $-178.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $295.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $408.1M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $292.1M | $161.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $449.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | 71.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 78.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 80.2% | 90.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 81.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 78.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 80.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 79.4% | 87.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 80.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | 5.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.5% | 3.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.8% | 13.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 21.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | 19.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 13.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.5% | -4.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 74.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.7% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 20.1% | 4.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 27.2% | — |
| Q4 25 | $2.44 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.50 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.21 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.89 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.13 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.61 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.88 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.89 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $3.0B | $2.7B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $13.5B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $28.3B | $11.8B |
| Total Assets | $48.2B | $44.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.48× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.6B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $14.3B | $2.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.8B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $676.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.3B | — |
| Q4 25 | $13.5B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.3B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.1B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $28.3B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $27.6B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.9B | $11.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.3B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.0B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.7B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.2B | $12.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.7B | — |
| Q4 25 | $48.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $48.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $23.8B | $44.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $13.0B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $11.6B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.0B | $41.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $10.6B | — |
| Q4 25 | 0.48× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.52× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.01× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $639.7M | $851.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $605.2M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 26.8% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.5% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.43× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $1.3B | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $639.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $671.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $275.4M | $851.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-67.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $562.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $455.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $476.6M | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $-87.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | $605.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $632.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $219.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-108.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $558.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $415.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $438.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-128.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | 26.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 36.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -7.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 37.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 27.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -7.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.5% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.6% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.43× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.77× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.80× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -0.23× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.51× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.12× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.63× | 6.28× | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.20× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
SNPS
| License And Maintenance | $940.7M | 42% |
| Other | $640.0M | 28% |
| Design IP Segment | $407.1M | 18% |
| KR | $236.9M | 11% |
| Sales Based Royalties | $30.1M | 1% |
TU
Segment breakdown not available.
