vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of 1ST SOURCE CORP (SRCE) and STRATASYS LTD. (SSYS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
STRATASYS LTD. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($137.0M vs $113.1M, roughly 1.2× 1ST SOURCE CORP). 1ST SOURCE CORP runs the higher net margin — 35.3% vs -40.6%, a 75.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, 1ST SOURCE CORP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (8.7% vs -2.2%). 1ST SOURCE CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($58.1M vs $2.5M). Over the past eight quarters, 1ST SOURCE CORP's revenue compounded faster (7.8% CAGR vs -7.4%).
1st Source Corporation is a financial services company headquartered in South Bend, Indiana. It operates 1st Source Bank, a bank with 81 branches in Indiana and Michigan. The bank's Specialty Finance Group provides financing for aircraft, trucks, and construction equipment. 1st Source Insurance provides insurance products and services.
Stratasys, Ltd. is an American-Israeli manufacturer of 3D printers, software, and materials for polymer additive manufacturing as well as 3D-printed parts on-demand. The company is incorporated in Israel. Engineers use Stratasys systems to model complex geometries in a wide range of polymer materials, including: ABS, polyphenylsulfone (PPSF), polycarbonate (PC), polyetherimide and Nylon 12.
SRCE vs SSYS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $113.1M | $137.0M |
| Net Profit | $40.0M | $-55.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | 41.0% |
| Operating Margin | 45.4% | -16.6% |
| Net Margin | 35.3% | -40.6% |
| Revenue YoY | 8.7% | -2.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 6.5% | -109.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.63 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $113.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $110.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $110.7M | $137.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $108.2M | $138.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $104.0M | $136.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $97.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $97.9M | $140.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $97.3M | $138.0M |
| Q1 26 | $40.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $41.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $42.3M | $-55.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $37.3M | $-16.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $37.5M | $-13.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $31.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $34.9M | $-26.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $36.8M | $-25.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 41.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 43.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 44.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 44.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 43.8% |
| Q1 26 | 45.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 49.7% | -16.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 44.5% | -12.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 45.8% | -9.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 46.3% | -18.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 49.1% | -18.9% |
| Q1 26 | 35.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 37.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 38.2% | -40.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 34.5% | -12.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 36.1% | -9.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 32.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 35.7% | -19.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 37.8% | -18.6% |
| Q1 26 | $1.63 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.67 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.71 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.51 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.52 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.27 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.41 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.49 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $71.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.3B | $852.5M |
| Total Assets | $9.1B | $1.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $71.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $71.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $70.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $64.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $70.9M |
| Q1 26 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $852.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $902.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $784.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $831.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.0B | $850.5M |
| Q1 26 | $9.1B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $9.1B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.1B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.1B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.0B | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.9B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.8B | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.9B | $1.1B |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $59.1M | $6.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $58.1M | $2.5M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 51.4% | 1.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.9% | 3.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.48× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $361.4M | $-11.5M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $59.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $223.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $51.0M | $6.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $44.9M | $-1.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $71.8M | $4.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $193.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $68.4M | $-4.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $50.0M | $-2.4M |
| Q1 26 | $58.1M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $213.0M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $47.3M | $2.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $43.0M | $-8.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $69.3M | $789.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $181.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $66.7M | $-6.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $46.4M | $-4.9M |
| Q1 26 | 51.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 192.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 42.7% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 39.8% | -6.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 66.6% | 0.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 185.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 68.1% | -4.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 47.7% | -3.6% |
| Q1 26 | 0.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 9.1% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.4% | 3.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.7% | 5.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.4% | 2.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.7% | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.7% | 1.8% |
| Q1 26 | 1.48× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.42× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.21× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.20× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.91× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.17× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.96× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.36× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
