vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of SURF AIR MOBILITY INC. (SRFM) and Viking Acquisition Corp I (VACI), based on the latest 10-Q / 10-K filings. Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Surf Air Mobility Inc. is an American aviation company focused on regional flying. The company plans to develop electric and hybrid powertrains to upgrade existing aircraft. Surf Air Mobility is also developing AI-enabled SurfOS operating system for the regional air mobility industry. Surf Air Mobility is the parent company of Surf Air, Surf On Demand, and two airlines, Mokulele Airlines and Southern Airways Express.
Viking Air Ltd. was an operator and manufacturer of aircraft, as well as aircraft parts and systems, based at Victoria International Airport in North Saanich, British Columbia, Canada. The company provides upgrades to the DHC-2 Beaver, spare parts for older de Havilland Canada aircraft, and components for Bell Helicopter Textron. The company operated as a subsidiary of Longview Aviation Capital until it was amalgamated into it along with sister company De Havilland Canada in August 2024, with...
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history — bar widths are scaled to the larger of the two companies so you can eyeball the size gap and growth trajectory without doing math. Quarters aligned by calendar period (report date) so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $26.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $29.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $27.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $23.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $28.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $28.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $32.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $30.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-36.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-27.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-28.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-18.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-12.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-27.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-37.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | -97.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -56.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -58.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -79.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -30.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -78.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -112.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | -139.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -93.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -102.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -78.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -43.1% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -83.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -120.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | $-0.08 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.64 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.34 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.09 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.80 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.94 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.31 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.35 | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Sankey diagram of revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company. Charts shown full-width and stacked so both segment hierarchies are readable side-by-side on desktop and mobile.
