vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of SS Innovations International, Inc. (SSII) and Tectonic Financial, Inc. (TECTP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Tectonic Financial, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($23.0M vs $14.5M, roughly 1.6× SS Innovations International, Inc.). Tectonic Financial, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 23.8% vs -17.0%, a 40.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, SS Innovations International, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (79.1% vs 17.9%). SS Innovations International, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-3.2M vs $-17.3M). Over the past eight quarters, Tectonic Financial, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (270.5% CAGR vs 99.9%).
SS Innovations International, Inc. is a global medical technology enterprise specializing in the research, development and manufacturing of innovative surgical robotic systems. It provides high-precision, accessible robotic platforms for minimally invasive surgery, catering to healthcare facilities across multiple regions to boost surgical outcomes and cut procedural burdens.
Tectonic Financial, Inc.TECTPEarnings & Financial Report
Tectonic Financial, Inc. is a US-based diversified financial services provider. It offers core services including wealth management, investment banking, capital markets advisory, and tailored financial solutions. Its key client segments cover high-net-worth individuals, institutional investors, and small to mid-sized enterprises across North America.
SSII vs TECTP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $14.5M | $23.0M |
| Net Profit | $-2.5M | $5.5M |
| Gross Margin | 43.9% | — |
| Operating Margin | -3.7% | 30.6% |
| Net Margin | -17.0% | 23.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 79.1% | 17.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -28.5% | 15.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.01 | $0.73 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $14.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $12.8M | $23.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.0M | $21.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.1M | $21.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.1M | $21.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.4M | $19.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.5M | $18.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.6M | $17.6M |
| Q4 25 | $-2.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.7M | $5.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-256.7K | $4.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.7M | $4.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-1.9M | $3.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.2M | $4.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.1M | $3.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-9.8M | $3.1M |
| Q4 25 | 43.9% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 48.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 59.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 21.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 48.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 52.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 31.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 20.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | -3.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -14.3% | 30.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.0% | 25.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -115.6% | 26.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -22.7% | 22.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | -73.1% | 29.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | -90.9% | 21.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -270.3% | 22.2% |
| Q4 25 | -17.0% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -29.0% | 23.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -2.6% | 19.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -111.0% | 20.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -23.7% | 14.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -74.0% | 24.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | -91.8% | 16.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | -270.5% | 17.4% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.01 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.02 | $0.73 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.00 | $0.55 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.03 | $0.57 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.01 | $0.35 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.02 | $0.58 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.02 | $0.38 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.06 | $0.37 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $3.2M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $38.2M | $119.2M |
| Total Assets | $74.2M | $1.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $3.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $15.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $466.5K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $220.4K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $608.2K | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $948.1K | — |
| Q4 25 | $38.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $39.6M | $119.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $42.0M | $114.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $40.6M | $111.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $13.5M | $113.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.7M | $112.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.8M | $110.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $16.7M | $108.5M |
| Q4 25 | $74.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $69.6M | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $70.0M | $997.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $63.5M | $910.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $42.4M | $863.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $39.0M | $847.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $35.7M | $777.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $35.2M | $777.6M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-1.5M | $-17.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-3.2M | $-17.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -22.3% | -74.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 11.8% | 0.0% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -3.14× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-22.2M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-1.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-7.5M | $-17.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.5M | $-32.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-6.1M | $-35.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.3M | $-86.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.5M | $-22.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-1.0M | $-30.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.7M | $-3.2M |
| Q4 25 | $-3.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-8.2M | $-17.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-7.0M | $-35.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-3.4M | $-86.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-4.2M | $-22.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.1M | $-30.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.8M | $-3.3M |
| Q4 25 | -22.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -64.1% | -74.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -37.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -136.2% | -163.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -41.7% | -406.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -96.9% | -115.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -69.5% | -165.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | -76.9% | -18.8% |
| Q4 25 | 11.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.9% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.2% | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.0% | 0.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.5% | 1.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 38.8% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 46.8% | 0.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.5% | 0.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -3.14× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -7.61× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -8.00× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -28.99× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -4.74× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -9.76× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -1.03× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
SSII
| System Sales | $13.4M | 92% |
| Other | $1.2M | 8% |
TECTP
Segment breakdown not available.
