vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of STRATASYS LTD. (SSYS) and VIRTUS INVESTMENT PARTNERS, INC. (VRTS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
VIRTUS INVESTMENT PARTNERS, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($208.0M vs $137.0M, roughly 1.5× STRATASYS LTD.). VIRTUS INVESTMENT PARTNERS, INC. runs the higher net margin — 16.3% vs -40.6%, a 56.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, STRATASYS LTD. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (-2.2% vs -10.9%). STRATASYS LTD. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($2.5M vs $-74.1M). Over the past eight quarters, VIRTUS INVESTMENT PARTNERS, INC.'s revenue compounded faster (-3.2% CAGR vs -7.4%).
Stratasys, Ltd. is an American-Israeli manufacturer of 3D printers, software, and materials for polymer additive manufacturing as well as 3D-printed parts on-demand. The company is incorporated in Israel. Engineers use Stratasys systems to model complex geometries in a wide range of polymer materials, including: ABS, polyphenylsulfone (PPSF), polycarbonate (PC), polyetherimide and Nylon 12.
VIRTUS INVESTMENT PARTNERS, INC.VRTSEarnings & Financial Report
Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. is an American company which operates as a multi-manager asset management business, comprising a number of individual affiliated managers, each having its own investment process and brand, and the services of unaffiliated sub advisers.
SSYS vs VRTS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $137.0M | $208.0M |
| Net Profit | $-55.6M | $33.9M |
| Gross Margin | 41.0% | — |
| Operating Margin | -16.6% | 19.1% |
| Net Margin | -40.6% | 16.3% |
| Revenue YoY | -2.2% | -10.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -109.0% | -14.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $5.15 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $208.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $137.0M | $216.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $138.1M | $210.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $136.0M | $217.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $233.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $140.0M | $227.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $138.0M | $224.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $144.1M | $222.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $33.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-55.6M | $31.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-16.7M | $42.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-13.1M | $28.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $39.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-26.6M | $49.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-25.7M | $26.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-26.0M | $37.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 41.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 43.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 44.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 44.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 43.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 44.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 19.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | -16.6% | 21.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -12.0% | 21.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -9.1% | 16.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 21.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -18.2% | 24.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -18.9% | 19.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -17.0% | 14.5% |
| Q4 25 | — | 16.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -40.6% | 14.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -12.1% | 20.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -9.6% | 12.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 16.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | -19.0% | 21.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | -18.6% | 11.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | -18.0% | 17.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | $5.15 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $4.65 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $6.12 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.05 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.65 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $5.71 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.43 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $4.10 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $71.5M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $390.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $852.5M | $934.0M |
| Total Assets | $1.1B | $4.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.42× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $71.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $71.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $70.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $64.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $70.9M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $91.1M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $390.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $390.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $231.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $231.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $232.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $237.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $247.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $253.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $934.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $852.5M | $918.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $902.4M | $896.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $784.8M | $893.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $897.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $831.8M | $889.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $850.5M | $868.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $866.1M | $871.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $4.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $3.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $3.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $3.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $3.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $3.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.1B | $3.5B |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.42× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.43× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.26× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.26× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.26× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.27× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.29× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.29× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $6.9M | $-67.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $2.5M | $-74.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 1.8% | -35.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.2% | 3.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | -1.99× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-11.5M | $100.2M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $-67.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.9M | $108.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-1.1M | $75.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.5M | $-3.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-4.5M | $69.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.4M | $70.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.3M | $-34.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-74.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.5M | $106.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-8.4M | $74.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $789.0K | $-6.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-3.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-6.3M | $68.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.9M | $68.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $5.0M | $-36.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | -35.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.8% | 49.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -6.1% | 35.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.6% | -3.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -1.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | -4.5% | 30.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -3.6% | 30.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 3.5% | -16.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.2% | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.3% | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.8% | 1.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.3% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.8% | 0.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.6% | 0.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | -1.99× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.45× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.77× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -0.13× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.04× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.41× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.69× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -0.91× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
SSYS
Segment breakdown not available.
VRTS
| Open End Funds | $68.9M | 33% |
| Retail Separate Accounts | $51.3M | 25% |
| Institutional Accounts | $39.6M | 19% |
| Administration And Shareholder Service Fees | $18.4M | 9% |
| Closed End Funds | $15.9M | 8% |
| Distribution And Service Fees | $12.3M | 6% |
