vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of STAG Industrial, Inc. (STAG) and UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE INC (UTI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
STAG Industrial, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($224.2M vs $220.8M, roughly 1.0× UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE INC). STAG Industrial, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 27.6% vs 5.8%, a 21.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (9.6% vs 9.1%). Over the past eight quarters, UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE INC's revenue compounded faster (9.5% CAGR vs 8.7%).
Stag Arms is a firearms manufacturer founded in May 2003 and located in Cheyenne, Wyoming. Stag Arms is a manufacturer of the AR-15 type rifle, marketed as Stag-15 rifles. Stag advertises that all their weapons and accessories are made in the United States. They are best known for their left-handed AR-15 rifles, which use a mirror imaged upper receiver and have the ejection port reversed for left-handed shooters and the safety selector control on the right side of the lower receiver.
Universal Technical Institute, Inc. (UTI) is a private for-profit system of technical colleges in the United States. It was established in 1965 by Robert Sweet.
STAG vs UTI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $224.2M | $220.8M |
| Net Profit | $62.0M | $12.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | 7.1% |
| Net Margin | 27.6% | 5.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 9.1% | 9.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -42.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.32 | $0.23 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $224.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $220.9M | $220.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $211.1M | $222.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $207.6M | $204.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $205.6M | $207.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $199.3M | $201.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $190.7M | $196.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $189.8M | $177.5M |
| Q1 26 | $62.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $83.5M | $12.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $48.6M | $18.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $50.0M | $10.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $91.4M | $11.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $51.0M | $22.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $41.9M | $18.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $59.8M | $5.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 7.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 11.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 6.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 8.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 13.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 13.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.2% |
| Q1 26 | 27.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 37.8% | 5.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.0% | 8.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 24.1% | 5.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 44.5% | 5.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 25.6% | 11.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.9% | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 31.5% | 2.8% |
| Q1 26 | $0.32 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $0.23 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.33 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.19 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.21 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.40 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.35 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.09 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $8.9M | $162.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $101.4M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.6B | $335.9M |
| Total Assets | $7.2B | $834.0M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.30× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $8.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $14.9M | $162.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.3M | $169.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.4M | $70.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.3M | $96.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $36.3M | $172.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $70.0M | $161.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $33.3M | $115.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.3B | $101.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.1B | $87.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.0B | $73.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.0B | $94.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.0B | $120.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.9B | $125.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.8B | $137.3M |
| Q1 26 | $3.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.6B | $335.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4B | $328.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.4B | $306.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.5B | $293.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.5B | $280.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.3B | $260.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.3B | $239.4M |
| Q1 26 | $7.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.2B | $834.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.9B | $826.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.8B | $740.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.8B | $720.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.8B | $753.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.6B | $744.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.4B | $706.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.91× | 0.30× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.91× | 0.27× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.88× | 0.24× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.87× | 0.32× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.88× | 0.43× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.89× | 0.48× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.84× | 0.57× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $3.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-19.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -8.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.9% | 10.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 0.24× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $16.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $104.5M | $3.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $143.5M | $57.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $111.9M | $18.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $103.5M | $-789.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $104.9M | $23.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $128.0M | $67.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $122.2M | $10.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $43.8M | $-19.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $95.5M | $40.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $62.3M | $6.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $57.2M | $-11.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $37.6M | $19.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $86.7M | $60.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $105.0M | $3.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 19.8% | -8.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 45.2% | 18.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 30.0% | 3.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 27.8% | -5.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.8% | 9.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 45.5% | 30.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 55.3% | 1.7% |
| Q1 26 | 3.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 27.4% | 10.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.7% | 7.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.9% | 5.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.5% | 5.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 33.8% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.6% | 3.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.1% | 4.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.25× | 0.24× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.95× | 3.04× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.24× | 1.69× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.13× | -0.07× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.06× | 1.04× | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.06× | 3.58× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.04× | 2.01× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
STAG
Segment breakdown not available.
UTI
| UTI | $142.8M | 65% |
| Concorde | $78.0M | 35% |
