vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of STAG Industrial, Inc. (STAG) and Vroom, Inc. (VRM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Vroom, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($235.9M vs $224.2M, roughly 1.1× STAG Industrial, Inc.). STAG Industrial, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 27.6% vs -59.8%, a 87.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Vroom, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (12.9% vs 9.1%). Over the past eight quarters, STAG Industrial, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (8.7% CAGR vs -49.5%).
Stag Arms is a firearms manufacturer founded in May 2003 and located in Cheyenne, Wyoming. Stag Arms is a manufacturer of the AR-15 type rifle, marketed as Stag-15 rifles. Stag advertises that all their weapons and accessories are made in the United States. They are best known for their left-handed AR-15 rifles, which use a mirror imaged upper receiver and have the ejection port reversed for left-handed shooters and the safety selector control on the right side of the lower receiver.
Vroom, Inc. is a parent company of United Auto Credit Corporation (UACC) and CarStory. Previously, Vroom was a used car retailer and e-commerce company that let consumers buy, sell, and finance cars online. Vroom ceased e-commerce automotive sales operations on January 22, 2024.
STAG vs VRM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2023
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $224.2M | $235.9M |
| Net Profit | $62.0M | $-141.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | 12.3% |
| Operating Margin | — | -11.5% |
| Net Margin | 27.6% | -59.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 9.1% | 12.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -669.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.32 | $-80.66 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $224.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $220.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $211.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $207.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $205.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $199.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $190.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $189.8M | — |
| Q1 26 | $62.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $83.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $48.6M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $50.0M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $91.4M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $51.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $41.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $59.8M | — |
| Q1 26 | 27.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 37.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 24.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 44.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 25.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 31.5% | — |
| Q1 26 | $0.32 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $8.9M | $135.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $454.2M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.6B | $127.7M |
| Total Assets | $7.2B | $1.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 3.56× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $8.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $14.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $36.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $70.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $33.3M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.3B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.1B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.0B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.9B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.8B | — |
| Q1 26 | $3.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.6B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.4B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.5B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.3B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.3B | — |
| Q1 26 | $7.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.9B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.8B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.8B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.8B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.6B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.4B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.91× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.91× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.88× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.87× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.88× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.89× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.84× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $-108.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-108.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -46.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.9% | 0.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $-536.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $104.5M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $143.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $111.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $103.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $104.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $128.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $122.2M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $43.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $95.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $62.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $57.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $37.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $86.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $105.0M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 19.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 45.2% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 30.0% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 27.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 45.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 55.3% | — |
| Q1 26 | 3.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 27.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 33.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.1% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.25× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.95× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.24× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.13× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.06× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.06× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.04× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
