vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of STAG Industrial, Inc. (STAG) and EXPRO GROUP HOLDINGS N.V. (XPRO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
EXPRO GROUP HOLDINGS N.V. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($382.1M vs $224.2M, roughly 1.7× STAG Industrial, Inc.). STAG Industrial, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 27.6% vs 1.5%, a 26.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, STAG Industrial, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (9.1% vs -12.5%). Over the past eight quarters, STAG Industrial, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (8.7% CAGR vs -0.2%).
Stag Arms is a firearms manufacturer founded in May 2003 and located in Cheyenne, Wyoming. Stag Arms is a manufacturer of the AR-15 type rifle, marketed as Stag-15 rifles. Stag advertises that all their weapons and accessories are made in the United States. They are best known for their left-handed AR-15 rifles, which use a mirror imaged upper receiver and have the ejection port reversed for left-handed shooters and the safety selector control on the right side of the lower receiver.
Expro is an energy services provider headquartered in Houston, Texas, United States.
STAG vs XPRO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $224.2M | $382.1M |
| Net Profit | $62.0M | $5.8M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | 3.1% |
| Net Margin | 27.6% | 1.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 9.1% | -12.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -74.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.32 | $0.05 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $224.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $220.9M | $382.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $211.1M | $411.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $207.6M | $422.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $205.6M | $390.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $199.3M | $436.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $190.7M | $422.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $189.8M | $469.6M |
| Q1 26 | $62.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $83.5M | $5.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $48.6M | $14.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $50.0M | $18.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $91.4M | $13.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $51.0M | $23.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $41.9M | $16.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $59.8M | $15.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 3.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 6.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 7.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 2.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 7.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 6.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 5.9% |
| Q1 26 | 27.6% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 37.8% | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.0% | 3.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 24.1% | 4.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 44.5% | 3.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 25.6% | 5.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.9% | 3.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 31.5% | 3.3% |
| Q1 26 | $0.32 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $0.05 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.12 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.16 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.12 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.20 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.14 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.13 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $8.9M | $196.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $79.1M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.6B | $1.5B |
| Total Assets | $7.2B | $2.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.05× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $8.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $14.9M | $196.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $17.3M | $197.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $15.4M | $206.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.3M | $179.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $36.3M | $183.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $70.0M | $165.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $33.3M | $133.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.3B | $79.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.1B | $99.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.0B | $121.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.0B | $121.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.0B | $121.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.9B | $121.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.8B | $121.1M |
| Q1 26 | $3.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.6B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.4B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.4B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.5B | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.5B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.3B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.3B | $1.5B |
| Q1 26 | $7.2B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.2B | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.9B | $2.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.8B | $2.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.8B | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.8B | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.6B | $2.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.4B | $2.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.91× | 0.05× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.91× | 0.07× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.88× | 0.08× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.87× | 0.08× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.88× | 0.08× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.89× | 0.08× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.84× | 0.08× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $57.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $23.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 6.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 3.9% | 8.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 9.89× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $97.8M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $104.5M | $57.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $143.5M | $63.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $111.9M | $48.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $103.5M | $41.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $104.9M | $97.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $128.0M | $55.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $122.2M | $-13.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $43.8M | $23.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $95.5M | $39.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $62.3M | $27.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $57.2M | $8.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $37.6M | $53.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $86.7M | $23.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $105.0M | $-49.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 19.8% | 6.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 45.2% | 9.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 30.0% | 6.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 27.8% | 2.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.8% | 12.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 45.5% | 5.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 55.3% | -10.5% |
| Q1 26 | 3.9% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 27.4% | 8.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.7% | 5.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.9% | 5.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.5% | 8.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 33.8% | 10.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.6% | 7.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.1% | 7.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.25× | 9.89× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.95× | 4.52× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.24× | 2.69× | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.13× | 2.98× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.06× | 4.23× | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.06× | 3.40× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.04× | -0.86× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
STAG
Segment breakdown not available.
XPRO
| NLA | $130.3M | 34% |
| ESSA | $116.3M | 30% |
| MENA | $93.0M | 24% |
| Other | $42.5M | 11% |