vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Star Holdings (STHO) and Voyager Technologies, Inc. (VOYG). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Voyager Technologies, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($39.6M vs $25.4M, roughly 1.6× Star Holdings). Voyager Technologies, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -41.1% vs -75.5%, a 34.4% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Blue Star Ltd is an Indian multinational home appliances company, headquartered in Mumbai. It specializes in air conditioning, commercial refrigeration and MEP. It is the country's second largest homegrown player in the air conditioning space.
STHO vs VOYG — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $25.4M | $39.6M |
| Net Profit | $-19.1M | $-16.3M |
| Gross Margin | — | 15.4% |
| Operating Margin | -91.7% | -60.7% |
| Net Margin | -75.5% | -41.1% |
| Revenue YoY | -22.6% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 81.3% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-1.52 | $-0.28 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $25.4M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $28.1M | $39.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $42.1M | $45.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $14.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $32.8M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $24.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $30.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $25.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-19.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.8M | $-16.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-39.3M | $-31.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-7.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-102.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $91.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-27.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-49.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 15.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 18.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -91.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.0% | -60.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -94.5% | -52.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -55.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -314.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -91.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -192.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | -75.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.4% | -41.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -93.5% | -68.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -52.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -313.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 374.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -88.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -192.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | $-1.52 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.14 | $-0.28 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.95 | $-1.23 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.57 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-7.69 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.90 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-2.04 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-3.68 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $50.1M | $413.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $268.7M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $251.8M | $590.9M |
| Total Assets | $570.2M | $727.8M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 1.07× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $50.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $40.6M | $413.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $44.2M | $468.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $30.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $35.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $45.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $48.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $45.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | $268.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $259.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $245.4M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $231.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $217.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $201.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $197.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $195.0M | — |
| Q4 25 | $251.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $275.4M | $590.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $276.1M | $554.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $316.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $324.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $427.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $335.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $362.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | $570.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $595.9M | $727.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $589.9M | $685.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $618.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $608.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $696.5M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $601.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $622.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.07× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.94× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.89× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.73× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.67× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.47× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.59× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.54× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-11.7M | $-15.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-53.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -135.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 97.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-11.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.3M | $-15.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.6M | $-30.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-6.3M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-31.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-3.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-6.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-14.2M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-53.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-88.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -135.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -194.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 97.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 126.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.95× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -0.04× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
STHO
| Land Development | $13.0M | 51% |
| Other Income Revenue | $9.3M | 37% |
| Operating Lease Income | $2.0M | 8% |
| Other | $1.2M | 5% |
VOYG
| US Government | $26.9M | 68% |
| Space Solutions | $11.7M | 30% |
| Other | $1.0M | 3% |
