vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Strategic Education, Inc. (STRA) and EXPRO GROUP HOLDINGS N.V. (XPRO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
EXPRO GROUP HOLDINGS N.V. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($367.6M vs $305.9M, roughly 1.2× Strategic Education, Inc.). On growth, Strategic Education, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (0.8% vs -6.0%). Strategic Education, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($77.3M vs $23.2M). Over the past eight quarters, Strategic Education, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (-1.0% CAGR vs -11.5%).
Strategic Education, Inc. (SEI) is an education services holding company and is formerly known as Strayer Education, Inc. The company owns for-profit, online Capella University and Strayer University, as well as non-degree programs schools such as DevMountain, Hackbright Academy, and Sophia Learning.
Expro is an energy services provider headquartered in Houston, Texas, United States.
STRA vs XPRO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $305.9M | $367.6M |
| Net Profit | $32.8M | — |
| Gross Margin | — | 6.7% |
| Operating Margin | 13.4% | 0.0% |
| Net Margin | 10.7% | — |
| Revenue YoY | 0.8% | -6.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | 10.3% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.48 | $0.05 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $305.9M | $367.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | $323.2M | $382.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $319.9M | $411.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $321.5M | $422.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $303.6M | $390.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $311.5M | $436.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $306.0M | $422.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $312.3M | $469.6M |
| Q1 26 | $32.8M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $37.9M | $5.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $26.6M | $14.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $32.3M | $18.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $29.7M | $13.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $25.3M | $23.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $27.7M | $16.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $29.9M | $15.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | 6.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | 13.4% | 0.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | 16.0% | 3.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 11.6% | 6.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.2% | 7.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.1% | 2.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 11.6% | 7.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 11.9% | 6.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.4% | 5.9% |
| Q1 26 | 10.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 11.7% | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.3% | 3.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.1% | 4.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.8% | 3.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.1% | 5.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.1% | 3.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.6% | 3.3% |
| Q1 26 | $1.48 | $0.05 | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.65 | $0.05 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.15 | $0.12 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.37 | $0.16 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.24 | $0.12 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.05 | $0.20 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.15 | $0.14 | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.24 | $0.13 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $150.3M | $170.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $79.1M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.6B | $1.5B |
| Total Assets | $2.1B | $2.2B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.05× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $150.3M | $170.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | $148.1M | $196.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $172.6M | $197.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $164.9M | $206.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $182.6M | $179.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $184.0M | $183.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $222.1M | $165.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $256.2M | $133.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | $79.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $79.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $99.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $121.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $121.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $121.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $121.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $121.1M |
| Q1 26 | $1.6B | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.7B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | $1.5B |
| Q1 26 | $2.1B | $2.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.0B | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1B | $2.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1B | $2.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1B | $2.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.2B | $2.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.2B | $2.3B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.05× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.05× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.07× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.08× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.08× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.08× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.08× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.08× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $87.4M | $25.3M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $77.3M | $23.2M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 25.3% | 6.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.2% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 2.66× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $173.9M | $112.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $87.4M | $25.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $39.2M | $57.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $60.1M | $63.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $31.2M | $48.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $67.7M | $41.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $15.9M | $97.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $51.5M | $55.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $24.3M | $-13.2M |
| Q1 26 | $77.3M | $23.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $27.0M | $23.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $49.3M | $39.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $20.4M | $27.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $57.3M | $8.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.7M | $53.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $42.1M | $23.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.6M | $-49.5M |
| Q1 26 | 25.3% | 6.3% | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.3% | 6.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.4% | 9.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.3% | 6.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.9% | 2.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.5% | 12.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.8% | 5.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.3% | -10.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.8% | 8.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.4% | 5.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.4% | 5.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.4% | 8.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.6% | 10.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.1% | 7.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.4% | 7.7% |
| Q1 26 | 2.66× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.03× | 9.89× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.26× | 4.52× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.97× | 2.69× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.27× | 2.98× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.63× | 4.23× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.86× | 3.40× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.81× | -0.86× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
STRA
| U.S. Higher Education | $212.6M | 69% |
| Australia/New Zealand | $51.8M | 17% |
| Education Technology Services | $41.5M | 14% |
XPRO
Segment breakdown not available.