vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Star Equity Holdings, Inc. (STRRP) and VisionWave Holdings, Inc. (VWAV), based on the latest 10-Q / 10-K filings. Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Star Equity Holdings, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($56.8M vs $10.0M, roughly 5.7× VisionWave Holdings, Inc.). Star Equity Holdings, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -3.0% vs -69.4%, a 66.3% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Artists Equity is an American production company founded by actors and filmmakers Ben Affleck and Matt Damon in November 2022.
CoMix Wave Films, Inc. is a Japanese independent animation film studio and distribution company based in Chiyoda, Tokyo, Japan. The studio is known for its anime feature films, short films, and television commercials, particularly those made by director Makoto Shinkai. It was founded in March 2007 when it split from CoMix Wave Inc., which was initially formed in 1998 from Itochu Corporation, ASATSU, and other companies. On 15 October 2024, Toho announced that they'd acquired 45 shares or 6.0...
STRRP vs VWAV — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q1 2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $56.8M | $10.0M |
| Net Profit | $-1.7M | $-6.9M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | -0.2% | -65.7% |
| Net Margin | -3.0% | -69.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 69.0% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | -192.1% | -1522.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.49 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align — see 8-quarter trend below.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history — bar widths are scaled to the larger of the two companies so you can eyeball the size gap and growth trajectory without doing math. Quarters aligned by calendar period (report date) so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $56.8M | $10.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $48.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $35.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $31.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $33.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $36.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $35.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $33.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-1.7M | $-6.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-688.0K | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.8M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-585.0K | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-846.0K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-441.0K | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 43.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 50.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -0.2% | -65.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -3.4% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -0.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -9.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | -3.0% | -69.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -3.7% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -1.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -1.7% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -2.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -1.2% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -8.6% | — |
| Q4 25 | $-0.49 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.54 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.23 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.59 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.21 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.28 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.15 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.95 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest filing — the kind of financial-strength check premium terminals charge for.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $10.3M | $15.7K |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $65.7M | $3.1M |
| Total Assets | $113.2M | $18.4M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $10.3M | $15.7K | ||
| Q3 25 | $15.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $16.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $15.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.7M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $20.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $65.7M | $3.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $67.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $40.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $39.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $40.4M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $42.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $42.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $44.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | $113.2M | $18.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $117.1M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $55.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $53.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $52.6M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $52.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $52.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $52.6M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.10× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Net income can be massaged; cash flow is harder to fake.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-3.9M | $-5.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-4.9M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -8.6% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue; lower = less reinvestment burden | 1.8% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit; >1× = earnings back up with cash | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-9.0M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years match up.
| Q4 25 | $-3.9M | $-5.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-2.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $139.0K | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-802.0K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-4.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $102.0K | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-808.0K | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-4.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | -8.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -7.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.5% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 6.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.4% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -12.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -5.3% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.0% | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Sankey diagram of revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company. Charts shown full-width and stacked so both segment hierarchies are readable side-by-side on desktop and mobile.
