vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of STARZ ENTERTAINMENT CORP (STRZ) and Zeta Global Holdings Corp. (ZETA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Zeta Global Holdings Corp. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($394.6M vs $320.9M, roughly 1.2× STARZ ENTERTAINMENT CORP). Zeta Global Holdings Corp. runs the higher net margin — 1.7% vs -16.4%, a 18.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Zeta Global Holdings Corp. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (25.4% vs -7.5%). Zeta Global Holdings Corp. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($60.9M vs $-31.3M). Over the past eight quarters, Zeta Global Holdings Corp.'s revenue compounded faster (42.3% CAGR vs -40.6%).
Starz Entertainment Corp., formerly known as Lions Gate Entertainment Corporation, or simply Lionsgate, is a Canadian-American entertainment company currently headquartered in Santa Monica, California. Founded by Frank Giustra on July 10, 1997, it is/was domiciled and incorporated in Vancouver, British Columbia.
Zeta Global Holdings Corp. is an American marketing technology company which was founded in 2007. Zeta offers companies a suite of multichannel marketing tools focused on creating, maintaining, and monetizing customer relationships. The company went public on the New York Stock Exchange on June 10, 2021, at a US$1.7 billion valuation.
STRZ vs ZETA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $320.9M | $394.6M |
| Net Profit | $-52.6M | $6.5M |
| Gross Margin | — | 59.5% |
| Operating Margin | -10.8% | 4.5% |
| Net Margin | -16.4% | 1.7% |
| Revenue YoY | -7.5% | 25.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | -71.9% | -57.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-3.15 | $0.04 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $394.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $320.9M | $337.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $319.7M | $308.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $264.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $970.5M | $314.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $346.9M | $268.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $347.6M | $227.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $194.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $6.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-52.6M | $-3.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-42.5M | $-12.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-21.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-21.9M | $15.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-30.6M | $-17.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.2M | $-28.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-39.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | 59.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 60.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 62.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 60.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 60.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 60.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 60.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 60.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | 4.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -10.8% | 2.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -8.4% | -1.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -6.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.7% | 2.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | -4.9% | -4.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.9% | -11.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -18.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -16.4% | -1.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -13.3% | -4.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -8.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | -2.3% | 4.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | -8.8% | -6.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.2% | -12.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -20.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.04 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-3.15 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.54 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.10 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.09 | $0.10 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-1.83 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.26 | $-0.16 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.23 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $37.0M | $319.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $608.7M | $197.1M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $663.2M | $804.6M |
| Total Assets | $2.0B | $1.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.92× | 0.24× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $319.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $37.0M | $385.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $51.6M | $365.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $364.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $200.5M | $366.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $229.6M | $418.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $192.5M | $154.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $141.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $197.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $608.7M | $196.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $611.7M | $196.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $196.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4B | $196.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.1B | $196.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.5B | $184.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $184.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $804.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $663.2M | $689.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $712.3M | $673.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $676.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-168.3M | $676.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $935.9M | $474.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $973.1M | $217.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $191.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.2B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.1B | $869.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.2B | $583.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $550.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.24× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.92× | 0.29× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.86× | 0.29× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.29× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.29× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.24× | 0.41× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.59× | 0.85× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.96× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-26.1M | $64.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-31.3M | $60.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -9.8% | 15.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.6% | 0.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 9.81× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-317.7M | $185.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $64.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-26.1M | $57.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $65.4M | $42.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $34.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-335.3M | $43.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.1M | $34.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-33.5M | $31.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $24.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $60.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-31.3M | $52.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $58.5M | $39.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $32.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-349.3M | $35.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.4M | $29.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-38.4M | $24.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $18.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | 15.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -9.8% | 15.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.3% | 12.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 12.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | -36.0% | 11.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.3% | 11.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -11.0% | 10.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 9.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.6% | 1.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.2% | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.4% | 2.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.4% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.4% | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | 9.81× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.87× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -7.98× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
STRZ
| Over The Top Subscription Service OTT | $222.8M | 69% |
| Linear Subscription Service | $98.1M | 31% |
ZETA
Segment breakdown not available.
