vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of StubHub Holdings, Inc. (STUB) and WATTS WATER TECHNOLOGIES INC (WTS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
WATTS WATER TECHNOLOGIES INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($677.3M vs $468.1M, roughly 1.4× StubHub Holdings, Inc.). WATTS WATER TECHNOLOGIES INC runs the higher net margin — 14.7% vs -276.6%, a 291.3% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, WATTS WATER TECHNOLOGIES INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (21.4% vs 7.9%). StubHub Holdings, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($180.3M vs $6.6M).
StubHub Holdings operates a leading global online ticket marketplace for live entertainment events. It facilitates secure resale and direct purchase of tickets for concerts, sports matches, theater performances and other live experiences, serving consumers, event organizers and sellers across North America, Europe and Asia-Pacific.
AERCO International, Inc. is a manufacturer and supplier of commercial condensing boilers, high efficiency water heating equipment and energy recovery systems in the HVAC/plumbing industry across a variety of markets including education, lodging, government, office buildings, healthcare, industrial and multifamily housing. In 1949, AERCO introduced the industry's first semi-instantaneous, tankless steam-to-water water heater. In 1988, AERCO introduced the first condensing and fully modulating...
STUB vs WTS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $468.1M | $677.3M |
| Net Profit | $-1.3B | $99.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | 48.1% |
| Operating Margin | -292.3% | 19.6% |
| Net Margin | -276.6% | 14.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 7.9% | 21.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | -3821.6% | 34.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-4.27 | $2.97 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $677.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $625.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $468.1M | $611.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $643.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $558.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $540.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $433.8M | $543.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $597.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | $99.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $83.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-1.3B | $82.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $100.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $74.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $67.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-33.0M | $69.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $82.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | 48.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 49.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 48.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 50.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 48.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 46.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 47.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 47.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | 19.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 18.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -292.3% | 18.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 21.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 15.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 16.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.8% | 17.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 18.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | 14.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 13.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -276.6% | 13.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 15.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 13.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 12.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -7.6% | 12.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 13.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.97 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.50 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.27 | $2.45 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.01 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.21 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.02 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.15 | $2.06 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.44 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.4B | $374.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.7B | $197.8M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.7B | $2.1B |
| Total Assets | $5.6B | $2.9B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.98× | 0.09× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $374.7M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $405.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | $457.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $369.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $336.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $386.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $303.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $279.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | $197.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $815.9M | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.9B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.9B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.6B | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.4B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.09× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.98× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $181.4M | $17.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $180.3M | $6.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 38.5% | 1.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.2% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 0.18× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $317.3M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $17.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $154.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $181.4M | $122.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $69.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $55.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $139.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $90.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $85.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | $6.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $140.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $180.3M | $110.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $59.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $45.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $127.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $84.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $78.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 22.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 38.5% | 18.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 9.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 8.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 23.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 15.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 13.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.2% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.18× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.85× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.49× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.69× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.75× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.07× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.31× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.04× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
STUB
| Transaction Fees | $453.4M | 97% |
| Other | $14.7M | 3% |
WTS
| segment net | $517.8M | 76% |
| Other | $159.5M | 24% |
