vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Stereotaxis, Inc. (STXS) and Velo3D, Inc. (VELO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Velo3D, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($9.4M vs $8.6M, roughly 1.1× Stereotaxis, Inc.). Stereotaxis, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -64.0% vs -231.9%, a 167.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Stereotaxis, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (36.3% vs -25.2%). Over the past eight quarters, Stereotaxis, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (12.1% CAGR vs -1.8%).
Stereotaxis Inc. is an American publicly traded medical technology company based in St. Louis, Missouri, that makes robotic systems used by physicians to perform minimally-invasive endovascular procedures, including electrophysiology studies and cardiac catheter ablation procedures.
Velo3D, Inc. develops and sells advanced end-to-end metal additive manufacturing (3D printing) solutions, comprising industrial-grade printers, specialized processing software, and high-performance metal materials. It primarily serves global aerospace, defense, energy, semiconductor and industrial manufacturing markets, enabling customers to produce complex, high-precision metal parts that are difficult to manufacture with traditional methods.
STXS vs VELO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $8.6M | $9.4M |
| Net Profit | $-5.5M | $-21.9M |
| Gross Margin | 50.1% | -73.6% |
| Operating Margin | -65.4% | -231.0% |
| Net Margin | -64.0% | -231.9% |
| Revenue YoY | 36.3% | -25.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 26.4% | -2.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.06 | $-0.87 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $8.6M | $9.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $7.5M | $13.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $8.8M | $13.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.5M | $9.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.3M | $12.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $9.2M | $8.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.5M | $10.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.9M | $9.8M |
| Q4 25 | $-5.5M | $-21.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-6.5M | $-11.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.8M | $-13.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-5.8M | $-25.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-7.5M | $-21.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-6.2M | $-21.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.8M | $935.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $-4.5M | $-27.5M |
| Q4 25 | 50.1% | -73.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 54.9% | 3.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 52.0% | -11.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 54.4% | 7.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 50.7% | -3.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 44.6% | 49.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 73.6% | -28.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 57.6% | -28.8% |
| Q4 25 | -65.4% | -231.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | -87.8% | -73.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | -45.2% | -85.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | -79.3% | -123.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -120.3% | -167.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -69.0% | -213.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | -133.7% | -187.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -69.0% | -211.1% |
| Q4 25 | -64.0% | -231.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | -86.6% | -82.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -43.5% | -97.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -77.9% | -268.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | -118.5% | -168.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -67.3% | -265.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -129.6% | 9.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | -65.5% | -281.2% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.06 | $-0.87 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.07 | $-0.65 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.05 | $-0.94 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.07 | $-1.87 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.09 | $7.06 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.08 | $-35.52 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.07 | $1.65 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.06 | $-55.51 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $13.4M | $39.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $31.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $13.5M | $38.2M |
| Total Assets | $52.3M | $105.3M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.81× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $13.4M | $39.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.5M | $11.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $7.0M | $854.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $10.6M | $3.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $12.2M | $1.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.7M | $1.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.7M | $3.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | $17.6M | $10.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $31.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $23.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $22.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $21.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $5.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $32.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $33.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $44.0M |
| Q4 25 | $13.5M | $38.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.3M | $29.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.5M | $21.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.9M | $32.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.1M | $39.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $10.8M | $34.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $11.4M | $52.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $14.6M | $45.5M |
| Q4 25 | $52.3M | $105.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $45.6M | $93.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $41.2M | $78.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $45.7M | $91.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $46.7M | $89.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $50.9M | $110.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $36.0M | $116.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $39.5M | $136.1M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.81× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.77× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.05× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.66× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.14× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.94× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.64× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.97× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-4.0M | $-7.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $-8.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | -88.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 6.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-4.0M | $-7.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-4.2M | $-6.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-3.7M | $-1.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.8M | $-12.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3M | $-2.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-4.3M | $-2.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-3.1M | $-8.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-2.3M | $-20.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | $-8.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-6.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-3.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-2.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-4.3M | $-2.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-8.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-20.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | -88.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -46.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -22.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -17.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | -47.2% | -24.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -77.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -209.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | 6.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.0% | 2.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 13.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.1% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -8.52× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
STXS
| Disposables Service And Accessories | $5.3M | 61% |
| Systems | $3.4M | 39% |
VELO
Segment breakdown not available.
