vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of SILVERCORP METALS INC (SVM) and TaskUs, Inc. (TASK). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
TaskUs, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($313.0M vs $223.8M, roughly 1.4× SILVERCORP METALS INC). TaskUs, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 9.5% vs -1.3%, a 10.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. Over the past eight quarters, SILVERCORP METALS INC's revenue compounded faster (87.6% CAGR vs 17.3%).
Silvercorp Metals Inc. (Silvercorp) is a Canadian-based, China-focused precious metals company engaged in the acquisition, exploration, and development of silver-containing properties.
Computer Task Group, Inc. is an American multinational company headquartered in Buffalo, New York, that provides information technology staffing. December 2023, it was announced that Cegeka concluded the purchase of the majority stake (74%) in CTG.
SVM vs TASK — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $223.8M | $313.0M |
| Net Profit | $-2.9M | $29.7M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | 12.2% |
| Net Margin | -1.3% | 9.5% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 14.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 235.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.31 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $223.8M | $313.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $298.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $72.2M | $294.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $277.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $172.5M | $274.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $114.0M | $255.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $60.0M | $237.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $227.5M |
| Q4 25 | $-2.9M | $29.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $31.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $28.1M | $20.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $21.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $42.1M | $8.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $28.0M | $12.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.2M | $12.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $11.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | 12.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 12.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 10.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 12.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 30.5% | 8.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.7% | 9.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.0% | 9.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 10.4% |
| Q4 25 | -1.3% | 9.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 10.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 39.0% | 6.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 7.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.4% | 3.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.5% | 5.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.0% | 5.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 5.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.31 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.34 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.22 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.23 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.09 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.14 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.14 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.13 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $211.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $241.4M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $600.0M |
| Total Assets | — | $1.1B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.40× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $211.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $210.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $181.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $196.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $192.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $180.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $171.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $165.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $241.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $246.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $249.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $252.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $256.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $259.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $261.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $262.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $600.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $567.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $544.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $520.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $496.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $489.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $460.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $454.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $985.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $953.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $942.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $886.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $874.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.40× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.43× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.46× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.49× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.52× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.53× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.57× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.58× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $107.9M | $29.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $9.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 3.2% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 6.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.00× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $73.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $107.9M | $29.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $54.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $40.0M | $17.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $36.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $81.3M | $40.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $57.7M | $17.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.9M | $30.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $51.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $9.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $42.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $38.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $21.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $20.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $33.8M | $6.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.0M | $25.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $47.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 14.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 7.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 7.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 29.6% | 2.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 28.3% | 10.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 20.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | 6.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 5.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 5.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 7.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.0% | 4.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.8% | 1.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.00× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.73× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.42× | 0.85× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.72× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.93× | 4.59× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.06× | 1.34× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.19× | 2.38× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 4.37× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
SVM
Segment breakdown not available.
TASK
| Digital Customer Experience | $172.7M | 55% |
| Trust And Safety | $82.7M | 26% |
| AI Services | $57.5M | 18% |
