vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of SILVERCORP METALS INC (SVM) and VIRTUS INVESTMENT PARTNERS, INC. (VRTS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
SILVERCORP METALS INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($223.8M vs $199.5M, roughly 1.1× VIRTUS INVESTMENT PARTNERS, INC.). VIRTUS INVESTMENT PARTNERS, INC. runs the higher net margin — 3.6% vs -1.3%, a 4.8% gap on every dollar of revenue. Over the past eight quarters, SILVERCORP METALS INC's revenue compounded faster (87.6% CAGR vs -5.7%).
Silvercorp Metals Inc. (Silvercorp) is a Canadian-based, China-focused precious metals company engaged in the acquisition, exploration, and development of silver-containing properties.
VIRTUS INVESTMENT PARTNERS, INC.VRTSEarnings & Financial Report
Virtus Investment Partners, Inc. is an American company which operates as a multi-manager asset management business, comprising a number of individual affiliated managers, each having its own investment process and brand, and the services of unaffiliated sub advisers.
SVM vs VRTS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $223.8M | $199.5M |
| Net Profit | $-2.9M | $7.1M |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | — | 7.7% |
| Net Margin | -1.3% | 3.6% |
| Revenue YoY | — | -4.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -78.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $1.05 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $199.5M | ||
| Q4 25 | $223.8M | $208.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $216.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $72.2M | $210.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $217.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $172.5M | $233.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $114.0M | $227.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $60.0M | $224.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | $7.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-2.9M | $33.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $31.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $28.1M | $42.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $28.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $42.1M | $39.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $28.0M | $49.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.2M | $26.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | 7.7% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 19.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 21.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 21.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 16.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 30.5% | 21.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.7% | 24.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.0% | 19.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | 3.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | -1.3% | 16.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 14.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 39.0% | 20.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 12.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.4% | 16.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.5% | 21.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.0% | 11.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.05 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $5.15 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $4.65 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $6.12 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $4.05 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.65 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $5.71 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.43 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $136.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $93.6B |
| Total Assets | — | — |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $136.6M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $390.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $390.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $231.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $231.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $232.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $237.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $247.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | $93.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $934.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $918.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $896.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $893.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $897.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $889.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $868.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $4.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.9B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.7B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $4.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $3.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $3.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 0.42× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.43× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.26× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.26× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.26× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.27× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.29× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $107.9M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $107.9M | $-67.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $108.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $40.0M | $75.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-3.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $81.3M | $1.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $57.7M | $69.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.9M | $70.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $-74.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $106.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $74.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-6.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-3.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $33.8M | $68.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.0M | $68.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -35.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 49.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 35.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -3.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -1.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 29.6% | 30.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 28.3% | 30.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 3.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.0% | 0.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.8% | 0.6% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | -1.99× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.45× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.42× | 1.77× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -0.13× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.93× | 0.04× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.06× | 1.41× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.19× | 2.69× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
SVM
Segment breakdown not available.
VRTS
| Investment management fees | $169.1M | 85% |
| Administration and shareholder service fees | $17.3M | 9% |
| Distribution and service fees | $11.6M | 6% |
