vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of SILVERCORP METALS INC (SVM) and Zeta Global Holdings Corp. (ZETA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Zeta Global Holdings Corp. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($394.6M vs $223.8M, roughly 1.8× SILVERCORP METALS INC). Zeta Global Holdings Corp. runs the higher net margin — 1.7% vs -1.3%, a 2.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. Over the past eight quarters, SILVERCORP METALS INC's revenue compounded faster (87.6% CAGR vs 42.3%).
Silvercorp Metals Inc. (Silvercorp) is a Canadian-based, China-focused precious metals company engaged in the acquisition, exploration, and development of silver-containing properties.
Zeta Global Holdings Corp. is an American marketing technology company which was founded in 2007. Zeta offers companies a suite of multichannel marketing tools focused on creating, maintaining, and monetizing customer relationships. The company went public on the New York Stock Exchange on June 10, 2021, at a US$1.7 billion valuation.
SVM vs ZETA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $223.8M | $394.6M |
| Net Profit | $-2.9M | $6.5M |
| Gross Margin | — | 59.5% |
| Operating Margin | — | 4.5% |
| Net Margin | -1.3% | 1.7% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 25.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -57.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.04 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $223.8M | $394.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $337.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $72.2M | $308.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $264.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $172.5M | $314.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $114.0M | $268.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $60.0M | $227.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $194.9M |
| Q4 25 | $-2.9M | $6.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-3.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $28.1M | $-12.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-21.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $42.1M | $15.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $28.0M | $-17.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.2M | $-28.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-39.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | 59.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 60.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 62.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 60.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 60.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 60.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 60.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 60.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | 4.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 2.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -1.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -6.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 30.5% | 2.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.7% | -4.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.0% | -11.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -18.4% |
| Q4 25 | -1.3% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | -1.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 39.0% | -4.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | -8.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 24.4% | 4.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 24.5% | -6.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 22.0% | -12.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -20.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.04 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-0.02 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.06 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.10 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.10 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.09 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.16 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.23 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $319.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $197.1M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $804.6M |
| Total Assets | — | $1.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.24× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $319.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $385.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $365.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $364.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $366.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $418.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $154.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $141.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $197.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $196.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $196.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $196.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $196.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $196.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $184.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $184.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $804.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $689.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $673.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $676.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $676.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $474.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $217.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $191.6M |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $869.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $583.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $550.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.24× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.29× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.29× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.29× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.29× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.41× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.85× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 0.96× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $107.9M | $64.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $60.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 15.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 9.81× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $185.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $107.9M | $64.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $57.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $40.0M | $42.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $34.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $81.3M | $43.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $57.7M | $34.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $28.9M | $31.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $24.7M |
| Q4 25 | — | $60.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $52.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $39.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $32.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $35.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $33.8M | $29.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $17.0M | $24.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $18.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | 15.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 15.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 12.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 12.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 11.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 29.6% | 11.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 28.3% | 10.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 9.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | 0.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 21.0% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.8% | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | 9.81× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.42× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.93× | 2.87× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.06× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.19× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
