vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Stanley Black & Decker (SWK) and Tapestry, Inc. (TPR). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Stanley Black & Decker is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.8B vs $2.5B, roughly 1.5× Tapestry, Inc.). Tapestry, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 22.4% vs 1.4%, a 21.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Tapestry, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (14.0% vs 0.1%). Tapestry, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($1.0B vs $155.3M). Over the past eight quarters, Tapestry, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (29.9% CAGR vs 0.3%).
Stanley Black & Decker, Inc., formerly known as The Stanley Works, is an American manufacturer of industrial tools and household hardware, and a provider of security products. Headquartered in the Greater Hartford city of New Britain, Connecticut, Stanley Black & Decker is the result of the merger of The Stanley Works and Black & Decker on March 12, 2010.
Tapestry, Inc. is a leading American multinational luxury fashion holding company. It owns three iconic lifestyle brands: Coach, Kate Spade New York, and Stuart Weitzman, offering premium handbags, apparel, footwear, accessories, and fragrances to global consumers via physical retail stores and e-commerce platforms.
SWK vs TPR — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $3.8B | $2.5B |
| Net Profit | $51.4M | $561.3M |
| Gross Margin | 31.4% | 75.5% |
| Operating Margin | — | 28.6% |
| Net Margin | 1.4% | 22.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 0.1% | 14.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -43.6% | 80.8% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.34 | $2.68 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.8B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.9B | $1.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.7B | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7B | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.8B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.0B | $1.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.9B | $1.5B |
| Q4 25 | — | $561.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $51.4M | $274.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $101.9M | $-517.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $90.4M | $203.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $194.9M | $310.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $91.1M | $186.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-11.2M | $159.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $19.5M | $139.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | 75.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 31.4% | 76.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 27.0% | 76.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 29.9% | 76.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 30.8% | 74.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 29.9% | 75.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 28.4% | 74.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 28.6% | 74.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | 28.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 19.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -33.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 16.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.4% | 22.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 10.6% | 16.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.5% | 14.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 8.3% | 13.8% |
| Q4 25 | — | 22.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.4% | 16.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.6% | -30.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.4% | 12.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 5.2% | 14.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.4% | 12.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | -0.3% | 10.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.5% | 9.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.68 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.34 | $1.28 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.67 | $-2.30 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.60 | $0.95 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.29 | $1.38 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.60 | $0.79 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.07 | $0.67 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.13 | $0.60 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $268.3M | $1.1B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $5.3B | $2.4B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $9.0B | $551.2M |
| Total Assets | $21.8B | $6.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.59× | 4.32× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $268.3M | $743.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $311.8M | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $344.8M | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $290.5M | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $298.7M | $7.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $318.5M | $7.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | $476.6M | $7.4B |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.3B | $2.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.6B | $2.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.6B | $2.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.1B | $2.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $6.1B | $7.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.1B | $6.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.1B | $7.7B |
| Q4 25 | — | $551.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.0B | $399.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $9.1B | $857.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $8.8B | $1.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $8.7B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.9B | $3.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.7B | $2.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $8.9B | $2.8B |
| Q4 25 | — | $6.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $21.8B | $6.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $22.5B | $6.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | $22.5B | $7.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $21.8B | $7.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $22.5B | $13.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $22.5B | $13.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $23.9B | $13.7B |
| Q4 25 | — | 4.32× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.59× | 5.95× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.62× | 2.77× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.63× | 1.59× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.70× | 1.78× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.69× | 2.35× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.70× | 2.39× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.69× | 2.77× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $221.2M | $1.1B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $155.3M | $1.0B |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 4.1% | 41.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.8% | 1.7% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 4.30× | 1.93× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $369.6M | $1.6B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $221.2M | $112.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $214.3M | $446.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-420.0M | $144.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $679.1M | $506.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $285.8M | $119.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $573.0M | $256.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-431.0M | $97.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $155.3M | $80.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $134.7M | $411.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-485.0M | $113.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $564.6M | $475.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $199.3M | $93.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $485.8M | $209.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-496.7M | $78.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | 41.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.1% | 4.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.4% | 23.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -13.0% | 7.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 15.2% | 21.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 5.3% | 6.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.1% | 13.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | -12.8% | 5.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.8% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.0% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.7% | 2.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.1% | 1.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.3% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.2% | 2.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.7% | 1.3% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.93× | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.30× | 0.41× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.10× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.65× | 0.71× | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.48× | 1.63× | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.14× | 0.64× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.61× | ||
| Q1 24 | -22.10× | 0.70× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
SWK
| Tools And Outdoor Segment | $3.3B | 87% |
| Engineered Fastening Segment | $500.5M | 13% |
TPR
| Coach | $1.4B | 57% |
| Other | $787.0M | 31% |
| Kate Spade Company | $290.0M | 12% |
