vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Stryker Corporation (SYK) and Vistra Corp. (VST). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Stryker Corporation is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($6.0B vs $4.8B, roughly 1.3× Vistra Corp.). Stryker Corporation runs the higher net margin — 12.4% vs 4.8%, a 7.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Vistra Corp. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (31.2% vs 2.6%). Over the past eight quarters, Vistra Corp.'s revenue compounded faster (23.3% CAGR vs 5.4%).
The Stryker is a family of eight-wheeled armored fighting vehicles derived from the Canadian LAV III, which in turn derived from the Swiss Mowag Piranha. Stryker vehicles are produced by General Dynamics Land Systems-Canada (GDLS-C) for the United States Army in a plant in London, Ontario. It has four-wheel drive (8×4) and can be switched to all-wheel drive (8×8).
Vistra may refer to either of two companies:Vistra, a corporate services company based in Hong Kong Vistra Corp, an energy company based in Texas
SYK vs VST — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $6.0B | $4.8B |
| Net Profit | $745.0M | $233.0M |
| Gross Margin | 63.3% | — |
| Operating Margin | 15.5% | 9.9% |
| Net Margin | 12.4% | 4.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 2.6% | 31.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 13.9% | -47.2% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.93 | $0.55 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $6.0B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $7.2B | $4.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.1B | $4.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.0B | $3.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.9B | $4.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | $6.4B | $3.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.5B | $4.3B | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.4B | $3.6B |
| Q1 26 | $745.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $849.0M | $233.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $859.0M | $652.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $884.0M | $327.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $654.0M | $-268.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $546.0M | $441.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $834.0M | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $825.0M | $365.0M |
| Q1 26 | 63.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 64.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 63.6% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 63.8% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 63.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 64.9% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 64.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 63.0% | — |
| Q1 26 | 15.5% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 25.2% | 9.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.7% | 21.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 18.5% | 13.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.3% | -2.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.0% | 16.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.7% | 59.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 19.4% | 22.5% |
| Q1 26 | 12.4% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 11.8% | 4.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.2% | 13.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.7% | 8.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.1% | -6.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 8.5% | 12.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.2% | 43.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.2% | 10.1% |
| Q1 26 | $1.93 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.20 | $0.55 | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.22 | $1.75 | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.29 | $0.81 | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.69 | $-0.93 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.41 | $1.09 | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.16 | $5.25 | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.14 | $0.90 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $2.9M | $785.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $15.8B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $23.0M | $5.1B |
| Total Assets | $46.3M | $41.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 3.11× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $2.9M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.0B | $785.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.3B | $602.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.4B | $458.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.3B | $561.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7B | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.9B | $905.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.9B | $1.6B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $15.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $15.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $15.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $15.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $15.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $13.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $13.9B |
| Q1 26 | $23.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $22.4B | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $21.8B | $5.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.2B | $4.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $20.9B | $4.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $20.6B | $5.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | $20.1B | $5.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $19.8B | $5.6B |
| Q1 26 | $46.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $47.8B | $41.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $47.1B | $38.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $46.3B | $38.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $46.0B | $38.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $43.0B | $37.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $43.8B | $37.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $39.1B | $39.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 3.11× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.02× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.22× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 3.20× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.77× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 2.56× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.49× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $581.0M | $1.4B |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $596.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 12.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 17.4% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.78× | 6.15× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $1.3B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $581.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.1B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.5B | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $572.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $250.0M | $599.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.9B | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $633.0M | $1.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.9B | $596.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.4B | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $928.0M | $-118.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $127.0M | $-169.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.7B | $923.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.3B | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 24 | $481.0M | $698.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 26.1% | 12.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 22.3% | 21.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.4% | -3.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.2% | -4.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 25.9% | 25.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 23.7% | 23.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 8.9% | 19.4% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.7% | 17.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.1% | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.0% | 18.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.1% | 18.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.1% | 11.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.1% | 15.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.8% | 13.8% |
| Q1 26 | 0.78× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 2.52× | 6.15× | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.79× | 2.25× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.26× | 1.75× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.38× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.54× | 3.07× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.77× | 0.90× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.77× | 3.28× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
SYK
Segment breakdown not available.
VST
| Retail Energy Charge In ERCOT | $2.1B | 43% |
| Retail Energy Charge In Northeast Midwest | $1.2B | 24% |
| East Segment | $1.1B | 24% |
| Hedging Revenue Realized | $170.0M | 4% |
| Revenue From Other Wholesale Contracts | $116.0M | 2% |
| Transferable Production Tax Credit Revenues | $78.0M | 2% |
| West Segment | $77.0M | 2% |
| Intersegment Sales | $25.0M | 1% |
