vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Trip.com Group Ltd (TCOM) and Verisign (VRSN). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Verisign is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($425.3M vs $304.6M, roughly 1.4× Trip.com Group Ltd). Verisign runs the higher net margin — 48.5% vs 27.8%, a 20.7% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Trip.com Group Limited is a multinational travel agency headquartered in Shanghai, China. It is the largest online travel service provider in the world.
Verisign, Inc. is an American company based in Reston, Virginia, that operates a diverse array of network infrastructure, including two of the Internet's thirteen root nameservers, the authoritative registry for the .com, .net, and .name generic top-level domains and the .cc country-code top-level domains, and the back-end systems for the .jobs and .edu sponsored top-level domains.
TCOM vs VRSN — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $304.6M | $425.3M |
| Net Profit | $84.6M | $206.2M |
| Gross Margin | 78.8% | 88.5% |
| Operating Margin | 16.5% | 67.0% |
| Net Margin | 27.8% | 48.5% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 7.6% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | 7.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.12 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $304.6M | $425.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $419.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $409.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $402.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $395.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $390.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $242.7M | $387.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $384.3M |
| Q4 25 | $84.6M | $206.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $212.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $207.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $199.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $191.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $201.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $73.8M | $198.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $194.1M |
| Q4 25 | 78.8% | 88.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 88.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 88.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 87.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 87.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 88.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 81.8% | 87.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 87.2% |
| Q4 25 | 16.5% | 67.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 67.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 68.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 67.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 66.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 68.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 27.8% | 68.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 67.4% |
| Q4 25 | 27.8% | 48.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 50.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 50.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 49.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 48.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 51.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 30.4% | 51.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 50.5% |
| Q4 25 | $0.12 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.11 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $10.8B | $580.5M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $4.2B | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $23.8B | $-2.2B |
| Total Assets | $36.9B | $1.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.18× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $10.8B | $580.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $617.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $593.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $648.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $599.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $644.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $12.4B | $689.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $924.7M |
| Q4 25 | $4.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.2B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $23.8B | $-2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $-2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-2.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.1B | $-1.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-1.6B |
| Q4 25 | $36.9B | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.5B | ||
| Q2 24 | $34.2B | $1.5B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.7B |
| Q4 25 | 0.18× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.45× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $289.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $285.1M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 67.0% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 1.40× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $1.1B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $289.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $307.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $202.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $291.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $231.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $253.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $160.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $257.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | $285.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $303.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $194.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $285.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $222.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $247.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $151.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $253.5M |
| Q4 25 | — | 67.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 72.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 47.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 71.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 56.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 63.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 39.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 66.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.0% |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.40× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.45× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.98× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.46× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.21× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.26× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.81× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.33× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
TCOM
| Others | $273.0M | 90% |
| Other | $31.6M | 10% |
VRSN
Segment breakdown not available.
