vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of TIDEWATER INC (TDW) and UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE INC (UTI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
TIDEWATER INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($336.8M vs $221.4M, roughly 1.5× UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE INC). TIDEWATER INC runs the higher net margin — 65.3% vs 0.2%, a 65.1% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (6.7% vs -2.4%). Over the past eight quarters, UNIVERSAL TECHNICAL INSTITUTE INC's revenue compounded faster (11.7% CAGR vs 2.4%).
Tidewater, Inc. is a publicly traded international petroleum service company headquartered in Houston, Texas, U.S. It operates a fleet of ships, primarily providing vessels and marine services to the offshore petroleum and offshore wind industries.
Universal Technical Institute, Inc. (UTI) is a private for-profit system of technical colleges in the United States. It was established in 1965 by Robert Sweet.
TDW vs UTI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q2 FY2026
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $336.8M | $221.4M |
| Net Profit | $219.9M | $433.0K |
| Gross Margin | — | — |
| Operating Margin | 19.0% | 0.2% |
| Net Margin | 65.3% | 0.2% |
| Revenue YoY | -2.4% | 6.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | 495.8% | -60.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | $4.37 | $0.01 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $221.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $336.8M | $220.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $341.1M | $222.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $341.4M | $204.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $333.4M | $207.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $345.1M | $201.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $340.4M | $196.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $339.2M | $177.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | $433.0K | ||
| Q4 25 | $219.9M | $12.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-806.0K | $18.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $72.9M | $10.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $42.7M | $11.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $36.9M | $22.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $46.4M | $18.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $50.4M | $5.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 19.0% | 7.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.4% | 11.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.7% | 6.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.5% | 8.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 23.6% | 13.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.6% | 13.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.0% | 4.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 65.3% | 5.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.2% | 8.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 21.4% | 5.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.8% | 5.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.7% | 11.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 13.6% | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.8% | 2.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | $0.01 | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.37 | $0.23 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.02 | $0.33 | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.46 | $0.19 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.83 | $0.21 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.70 | $0.40 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.87 | $0.35 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.94 | $0.09 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $578.8M | $162.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $670.1M | $127.8M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.4B | $339.9M |
| Total Assets | $2.4B | $852.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.49× | 0.38× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $162.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | $578.8M | $162.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $428.2M | $169.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $369.4M | $70.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $341.8M | $96.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $324.9M | $172.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $280.8M | $161.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $315.9M | $115.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | $127.8M | ||
| Q4 25 | $670.1M | $101.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $87.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $73.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $94.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $647.9M | $120.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $125.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $137.3M |
| Q1 26 | — | $339.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | $335.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.1B | $328.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $306.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $293.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.1B | $280.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $260.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1B | $239.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | $852.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.4B | $834.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.1B | $826.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.1B | $740.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.1B | $720.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.1B | $753.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | $744.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.1B | $706.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.38× | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.49× | 0.30× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.27× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.24× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.32× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.58× | 0.43× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.48× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.57× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $153.0M | $7.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $147.8M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 43.9% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.5% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 0.70× | 16.33× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $353.3M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $7.1M | ||
| Q4 25 | $153.0M | $3.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $54.7M | $57.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $85.4M | $18.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $86.0M | $-789.0K | ||
| Q4 24 | $100.0M | $23.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $49.0M | $67.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $78.6M | $10.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $147.8M | $-19.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $49.6M | $40.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $80.2M | $6.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $75.7M | $-11.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $95.5M | $19.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $43.3M | $60.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $72.3M | $3.0M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 43.9% | -8.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.5% | 18.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.5% | 3.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 22.7% | -5.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 27.7% | 9.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.7% | 30.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 21.3% | 1.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.5% | 10.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.5% | 7.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.5% | 5.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.1% | 5.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.3% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.7% | 3.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.9% | 4.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | 16.33× | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.70× | 0.24× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 3.04× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.17× | 1.69× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.02× | -0.07× | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.71× | 1.04× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.06× | 3.58× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.56× | 2.01× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.