vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Tempus AI, Inc. (TEM) and Twist Bioscience Corp (TWST). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Tempus AI, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($367.2M vs $103.7M, roughly 3.5× Twist Bioscience Corp). Tempus AI, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -14.8% vs -29.4%, a 14.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Tempus AI, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (83.0% vs 16.9%). Twist Bioscience Corp produced more free cash flow last quarter ($-34.8M vs $-41.5M).
Tempus AI, Inc. is an American health technology company founded in 2015 by Eric Lefkofsky in Chicago, Illinois. It was established by Lefkofsky soon after his wife was diagnosed with breast cancer. Tempus uses data and artificial intelligence (AI) to create precision medicine services, including diagnostics, for oncology, cardiology, radiology, and depression. The company went public on the Nasdaq on June 14, 2024, under the ticker symbol "TEM."
Twist Bioscience is a public biotechnology company based in South San Francisco that manufactures synthetic DNA and DNA products for customers in a wide range of industries. Twist was founded in 2013 by Emily Leproust, Bill Banyai, and Bill Peck.
TEM vs TWST — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $367.2M | $103.7M |
| Net Profit | $-54.2M | $-30.5M |
| Gross Margin | — | 52.0% |
| Operating Margin | -16.7% | -31.7% |
| Net Margin | -14.8% | -29.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 83.0% | 16.9% |
| Net Profit YoY | -316.2% | 3.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.30 | $-0.50 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $367.2M | $103.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $334.2M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $314.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $255.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $200.7M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $180.9M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $166.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $145.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-54.2M | $-30.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-80.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-42.8M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-68.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $-13.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-75.8M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-552.2M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-64.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 52.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | -16.7% | -31.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | -18.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -19.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -26.9% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -25.3% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -29.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -321.4% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -36.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | -14.8% | -29.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -23.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | -13.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -26.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | -6.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -41.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -332.7% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -44.4% | — |
| Q4 25 | $-0.30 | $-0.50 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.46 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.25 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.40 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.56 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.46 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-6.86 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.47 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $604.8M | $197.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $491.3M | $456.1M |
| Total Assets | $2.3B | $638.1M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $604.8M | $197.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $655.9M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $186.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $151.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $341.0M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $388.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $478.8M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $79.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | $491.3M | $456.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $507.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $309.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $326.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $56.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $53.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $98.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-1.5B | — |
| Q4 25 | $2.3B | $638.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.3B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.6B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $926.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $971.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $864.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-36.8M | $-24.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-41.5M | $-34.8M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -11.3% | -33.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.3% | 9.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-239.1M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $-36.8M | $-24.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-119.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $44.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-105.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $48.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-97.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-101.4M | — |
| Q4 25 | $-41.5M | $-34.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-126.5M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $36.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-107.7M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $48.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-105.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-107.5M | — |
| Q4 25 | -11.3% | -33.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | -37.9% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 11.6% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -42.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 26.9% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | -63.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -73.7% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.3% | 9.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.0% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.4% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.8% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 4.2% | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
TEM
Segment breakdown not available.
TWST
| Industrial Chemicals | $37.2M | 36% |
| Diagnostics | $35.3M | 34% |
| Food Or Agriculture | $12.8M | 12% |
| Academic Research | $12.2M | 12% |
| Health Care | $6.1M | 6% |
