vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Teradyne (TER) and TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING CO LTD (TSM). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING CO LTD is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($35.5B vs $1.1B, roughly 32.8× Teradyne). TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING CO LTD runs the higher net margin — 50.5% vs 23.7%, a 26.7% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Teradyne, Inc. is an American automatic test equipment (ATE) designer and manufacturer based in North Reading, Massachusetts. Its high-profile customers include Samsung, Qualcomm, Intel, Analog Devices, Texas Instruments and IBM.
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC) is the world's largest dedicated independent semiconductor foundry, headquartered in Hsinchu, Taiwan. It manufactures advanced logic chips on contract for fabless customers including Apple, NVIDIA, AMD, Qualcomm, and Broadcom, and leads the industry in leading-edge process nodes (3nm/5nm/7nm).
TER vs TSM — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.1B | $35.5B |
| Net Profit | $257.2M | $17.9B |
| Gross Margin | 57.2% | 66.2% |
| Operating Margin | 27.1% | 58.0% |
| Net Margin | 23.7% | 50.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 43.9% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | 75.9% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.62 | $111.55 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $35.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $32.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | $769.2M | $30.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $651.8M | $28.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $685.7M | $26.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $752.9M | $88.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $737.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $729.9M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $17.9B | ||
| Q4 25 | $257.2M | $15.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $119.6M | $14.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $78.4M | $12.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $98.9M | $11.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $146.3M | $35.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $145.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $186.3M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 66.2% | ||
| Q4 25 | 57.2% | 62.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 58.4% | 59.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 57.2% | 58.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 60.6% | 58.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 59.4% | 56.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 59.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 58.3% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 58.0% | ||
| Q4 25 | 27.1% | 53.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.9% | 50.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 13.9% | 49.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 17.6% | 48.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.4% | 45.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.6% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 28.8% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | 50.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | 23.7% | 48.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.5% | 45.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.0% | 42.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.4% | 43.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.4% | 40.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 19.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 25.5% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $111.55 | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.62 | $98.45 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.75 | $87.20 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.49 | $76.80 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.61 | $69.70 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.89 | $1.36 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.89 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.14 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $293.8M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.8B | — |
| Total Assets | $4.2B | — |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $293.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $272.7M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $339.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $475.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $553.4M | $64.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $510.0M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $421.9M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $2.8B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.7B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.8B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.8B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.8B | $130.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.9B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.7B | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $4.2B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.0B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.8B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.7B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.7B | $204.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.8B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.6B | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $281.6M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $218.8M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 20.2% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 5.8% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.09× | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $450.4M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $281.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $49.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $182.1M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $161.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $282.6M | $55.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $166.3M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $216.1M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $218.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $131.7M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $97.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $225.2M | $26.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $114.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $171.2M | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 20.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 20.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 29.9% | 30.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.5% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.5% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.8% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.1% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 7.7% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.3% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 7.6% | 33.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.0% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.1% | — |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.09× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.41× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.32× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.63× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.93× | 1.58× | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.14× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.16× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
TER
| Soc | $646.5M | 60% |
| Memory | $206.5M | 19% |
| Transferred At Point In Time | $90.0M | 8% |
| Universal Robots | $89.4M | 8% |
| IST | $30.5M | 3% |
| Transferred Over Time | $20.5M | 2% |
TSM
Segment breakdown not available.
