vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Tecnoglass Inc. (TGLS) and Zeta Global Holdings Corp. (ZETA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Zeta Global Holdings Corp. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($394.6M vs $245.3M, roughly 1.6× Tecnoglass Inc.). Tecnoglass Inc. runs the higher net margin — 10.6% vs 1.7%, a 9.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Zeta Global Holdings Corp. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (25.4% vs 2.4%). Zeta Global Holdings Corp. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($60.9M vs $11.4M). Over the past eight quarters, Zeta Global Holdings Corp.'s revenue compounded faster (42.3% CAGR vs 12.8%).
Tecnoglass Inc. is a leading manufacturer of high-performance architectural glass, aluminum windows, doors, and associated building components. It primarily caters to residential and commercial construction sectors across North America and Latin America, offering custom, energy-efficient solutions for new construction and renovation projects.
Zeta Global Holdings Corp. is an American marketing technology company which was founded in 2007. Zeta offers companies a suite of multichannel marketing tools focused on creating, maintaining, and monetizing customer relationships. The company went public on the New York Stock Exchange on June 10, 2021, at a US$1.7 billion valuation.
TGLS vs ZETA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $245.3M | $394.6M |
| Net Profit | $26.1M | $6.5M |
| Gross Margin | 40.0% | 59.5% |
| Operating Margin | 18.3% | 4.5% |
| Net Margin | 10.6% | 1.7% |
| Revenue YoY | 2.4% | 25.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | -44.5% | -57.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.57 | $0.04 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $245.3M | $394.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $260.5M | $337.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $255.5M | $308.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $222.3M | $264.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $239.6M | $314.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $238.3M | $268.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $219.7M | $227.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $192.6M | $194.9M |
| Q4 25 | $26.1M | $6.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $47.2M | $-3.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $44.1M | $-12.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $42.2M | $-21.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $47.0M | $15.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $49.5M | $-17.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $35.0M | $-28.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $29.7M | $-39.6M |
| Q4 25 | 40.0% | 59.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 42.7% | 60.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 44.7% | 62.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 43.9% | 60.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | 44.5% | 60.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 45.8% | 60.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 40.8% | 60.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 38.8% | 60.6% |
| Q4 25 | 18.3% | 4.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.1% | 2.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 24.0% | -1.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 26.7% | -6.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 28.0% | 2.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 28.4% | -4.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 23.3% | -11.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 21.3% | -18.4% |
| Q4 25 | 10.6% | 1.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 18.1% | -1.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 17.3% | -4.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 19.0% | -8.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 19.6% | 4.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 20.8% | -6.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.9% | -12.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | 15.4% | -20.3% |
| Q4 25 | $0.57 | $0.04 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.01 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.94 | $-0.06 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.90 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.00 | $0.10 | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.05 | $-0.09 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.75 | $-0.16 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.63 | $-0.23 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $104.1M | $319.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $174.4M | $197.1M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $713.1M | $804.6M |
| Total Assets | $1.3B | $1.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.24× | 0.24× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $104.1M | $319.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $127.1M | $385.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $140.9M | $365.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $160.2M | $364.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $137.5M | $366.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $124.8M | $418.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $129.5M | $154.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $138.8M | $141.6M |
| Q4 25 | $174.4M | $197.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $114.7M | $196.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $110.6M | $196.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $110.6M | $196.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $111.1M | $196.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $126.8M | $196.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $144.7M | $184.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $160.9M | $184.2M |
| Q4 25 | $713.1M | $804.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $764.0M | $689.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $736.0M | $673.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $685.1M | $676.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $631.2M | $676.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $613.3M | $474.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $574.8M | $217.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $573.6M | $191.6M |
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $1.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.0B | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $996.3M | $869.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $942.5M | $583.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | $981.6M | $550.3M |
| Q4 25 | 0.24× | 0.24× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.15× | 0.29× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.15× | 0.29× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.16× | 0.29× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.18× | 0.29× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.21× | 0.41× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.25× | 0.85× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.28× | 0.96× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $31.0M | $64.1M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $11.4M | $60.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 4.7% | 15.4% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 8.0% | 0.8% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.19× | 9.81× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $34.5M | $185.1M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $31.0M | $64.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $40.0M | $57.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $17.9M | $42.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $46.9M | $34.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $61.1M | $43.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $41.5M | $34.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $34.5M | $31.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | $33.4M | $24.7M |
| Q4 25 | $11.4M | $60.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $21.2M | $52.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-14.7M | $39.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $16.5M | $32.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $35.4M | $35.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $17.8M | $29.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $14.2M | $24.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $23.6M | $18.9M |
| Q4 25 | 4.7% | 15.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 8.2% | 15.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -5.7% | 12.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.4% | 12.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.8% | 11.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 7.5% | 11.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.5% | 10.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | 12.2% | 9.7% |
| Q4 25 | 8.0% | 0.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.2% | 1.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 12.7% | 0.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 13.7% | 1.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 10.7% | 2.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | 9.9% | 1.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.2% | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.1% | 3.0% |
| Q4 25 | 1.19× | 9.81× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.85× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.41× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.11× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.30× | 2.87× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.84× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.98× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.13× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
TGLS
| Product Sales | $164.2M | 67% |
| Fixed Price Contracts | $81.1M | 33% |
| Related Party | $692.0K | 0% |
ZETA
Segment breakdown not available.