vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Target Hospitality Corp. (TH) and Zevia PBC (ZVIA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Target Hospitality Corp. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($73.5M vs $37.9M, roughly 1.9× Zevia PBC). Zevia PBC runs the higher net margin — -3.4% vs -20.3%, a 16.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Target Hospitality Corp. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (22.0% vs -4.0%). Over the past eight quarters, Target Hospitality Corp.'s revenue compounded faster (0.7% CAGR vs -1.2%).
Target Hospitality is a company that provides workforce lodging and other temporary, modular housing used for oil, gas and mining operations; large-scale events; and disaster relief. Target Hospitality is based in The Woodlands, Texas, and also has offices in Williston, North Dakota; Denver, Colorado; Calgary, Alberta.
Zevia is a Los Angeles based company that produces soft drinks, organic tea, energy drinks, and mixers sweetened with stevia. All Zevia products are zero-calorie, sugar-free, gluten free, vegan, certified kosher, and certified by The Non-GMO Project. In June 2021, Zevia filed to go public with an IPO.
TH vs ZVIA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $73.5M | $37.9M |
| Net Profit | $-14.9M | $-1.3M |
| Gross Margin | 9.6% | 47.7% |
| Operating Margin | -22.9% | -4.0% |
| Net Margin | -20.3% | -3.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 22.0% | -4.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | -219.1% | 80.9% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.14 | $-0.02 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $73.5M | $37.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $91.6M | $40.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $54.9M | $44.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $54.9M | $38.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $60.2M | $39.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $65.8M | $36.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $67.5M | $40.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $72.4M | $38.8M |
| Q4 25 | $-14.9M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-795.0K | $-2.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-14.9M | $-651.0K | ||
| Q1 25 | $-6.5M | $-6.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $12.5M | $-6.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $20.0M | $-2.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $18.4M | $-7.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $20.4M | $-7.2M |
| Q4 25 | 9.6% | 47.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.6% | 45.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.6% | 48.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 32.7% | 50.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 61.5% | 49.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 68.7% | 49.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 69.4% | 41.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 67.8% | 45.7% |
| Q4 25 | -22.9% | -4.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.1% | -7.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -30.8% | -2.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -2.0% | -16.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 34.5% | -16.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 42.5% | -8.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | 43.8% | -17.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 42.0% | -18.8% |
| Q4 25 | -20.3% | -3.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | -0.9% | -6.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -27.2% | -1.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -11.8% | -16.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 20.8% | -17.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 30.4% | -6.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 27.2% | -17.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 28.2% | -18.6% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.14 | $-0.02 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.01 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.15 | $-0.01 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.07 | $-0.08 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.12 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.20 | $-0.04 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.18 | $-0.10 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.20 | $-0.10 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $8.3M | $25.4M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.7M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $389.3M | $51.0M |
| Total Assets | $530.2M | $63.6M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.00× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $8.3M | $25.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $30.4M | $26.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $19.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $34.5M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $190.7M | $30.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $177.7M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $154.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $124.3M | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $26.3M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $42.9M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.5M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $994.0K | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.1M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $179.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | $389.3M | $51.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $402.4M | $51.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | $401.3M | $53.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $415.3M | $53.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $421.1M | $64.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $417.6M | $72.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $397.2M | $75.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $375.5M | $80.3M |
| Q4 25 | $530.2M | $63.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $541.2M | $60.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $533.7M | $62.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $562.5M | $62.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $725.8M | $68.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $709.8M | $72.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $697.0M | $72.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $687.2M | $85.1M |
| Q4 25 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.01× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.07× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.10× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.00× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.48× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $5.7M | $-507.0K |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $5.7M | $-507.0K | ||
| Q3 25 | $53.4M | $116.0K | ||
| Q2 25 | $11.1M | $-1.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.9M | $-2.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $30.6M | $-2.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $31.4M | $3.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $39.1M | $282.0K | ||
| Q1 24 | $50.6M | $-3.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-11.6M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -21.1% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 28.2% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 2.44× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.57× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.13× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.48× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
TH
| Services | $40.9M | 56% |
| Hospitality And Facilities Services South | $32.6M | 44% |
ZVIA
Segment breakdown not available.
