vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Thryv Holdings, Inc. (THRY) and TEAM INC (TISI). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
TEAM INC is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($224.8M vs $167.7M, roughly 1.3× Thryv Holdings, Inc.). Thryv Holdings, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 2.7% vs -1.7%, a 4.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, TEAM INC posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (5.4% vs -7.5%). TEAM INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($14.6M vs $-5.5M). Over the past eight quarters, TEAM INC's revenue compounded faster (6.1% CAGR vs -13.5%).
Thryv Holdings, Inc. is a publicly traded software as a service (SaaS) company, providing customer relationship management and online reputation management software for small businesses. It has headquarters in Dallas, Texas, and operates in 48 states across the United States of America with more than 2,400 employees. The company began as a conglomerate of Yellow Pages companies. In June 2020, Thryv reported $1.3 billion in revenue over a twelve-month period.
TeamViewer SE is an international technology company headquartered in Göppingen, Germany. The company became known for the TeamViewer remote access and support software of the same name. Within the TeamViewer software, customers can connect, monitor, and control computers, machines, and other devices. It can be used in various industries, for example, to digitalize processes along the industrial value chain. The company is listed on the stock exchange and is a member of MDAX and TecDAX.
THRY vs TISI — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $167.7M | $224.8M |
| Net Profit | $4.5M | $-3.8M |
| Gross Margin | 65.2% | 25.9% |
| Operating Margin | 37.3% | 2.9% |
| Net Margin | 2.7% | -1.7% |
| Revenue YoY | -7.5% | 5.4% |
| Net Profit YoY | 147.2% | 47.4% |
| EPS (diluted) | $0.10 | $-1.46 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $167.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $191.6M | $224.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $201.6M | $225.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $210.5M | $248.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $181.4M | $198.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $186.6M | $213.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $179.9M | $210.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $224.1M | $228.6M |
| Q1 26 | $4.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-9.7M | $-3.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.7M | $-11.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.9M | $-4.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-9.6M | $-29.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.9M | $-7.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-96.1M | $-11.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $5.5M | $-2.8M |
| Q1 26 | 65.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 68.0% | 25.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 67.7% | 25.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 69.7% | 27.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 65.8% | 23.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 65.9% | 26.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 62.3% | 25.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 66.3% | 27.8% |
| Q1 26 | 37.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.3% | 2.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 9.9% | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.0% | 4.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | -1.7% | -3.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | -3.9% | 1.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | -49.2% | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.0% | 4.9% |
| Q1 26 | 2.7% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | -5.0% | -1.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.8% | -5.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.6% | -1.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.3% | -15.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.2% | -3.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | -53.4% | -5.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.5% | -1.2% |
| Q1 26 | $0.10 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $-0.21 | $-1.46 | ||
| Q3 25 | $0.13 | $-2.68 | ||
| Q2 25 | $0.31 | $-0.95 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.22 | $-6.61 | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.28 | $-1.60 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.65 | $-2.52 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.15 | $-0.63 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $8.0M | $18.1M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $293.3M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $225.4M | $-24.5M |
| Total Assets | $693.7M | $485.5M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $8.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $10.8M | $18.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $11.6M | $14.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.8M | $20.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $11.0M | $16.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $16.3M | $35.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $12.5M | $19.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $15.5M | $22.5M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $253.5M | $293.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $268.2M | $298.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $275.6M | $366.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $299.0M | $349.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $284.3M | $318.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $307.8M | $314.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $342.1M | $313.0M |
| Q1 26 | $225.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $218.1M | $-24.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $221.1M | $-17.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $214.9M | $-22.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $193.2M | $-26.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $196.9M | $1.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $94.5M | $17.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $183.1M | $23.9M |
| Q1 26 | $693.7M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $688.6M | $485.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $701.8M | $531.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $687.7M | $548.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $703.7M | $515.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $712.2M | $528.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $654.8M | $545.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $785.5M | $549.6M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.16× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.21× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.28× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.55× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.44× | 183.33× | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.26× | 17.55× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.87× | 13.11× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $16.8M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-5.5M | $14.6M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -3.3% | 6.5% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 0.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $43.3M | $-20.6M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $22.2M | $16.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.2M | $3.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $29.6M | $-3.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-10.5M | $-28.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $26.1M | $21.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $36.0M | $5.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $22.2M | $-6.4M |
| Q1 26 | $-5.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $12.3M | $14.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $14.6M | $1.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $21.8M | $-6.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-17.6M | $-30.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $17.3M | $19.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | $27.5M | $3.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.3M | $-9.1M |
| Q1 26 | -3.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 6.4% | 6.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 7.2% | 0.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 10.4% | -2.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | -9.7% | -15.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | 9.3% | 9.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.3% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 5.9% | -4.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 5.2% | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.8% | 1.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.7% | 1.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 3.9% | 0.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.7% | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.7% | 0.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.0% | 1.2% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.93× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.12× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.32× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 4.01× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
THRY
| SaaS | $116.7M | 70% |
| Other | $50.9M | 30% |
TISI
| Repairand Maintenance Services | $114.8M | 51% |
| Non Destructive Evaluation And Testing Services | $84.9M | 38% |
| Heat Treating | $14.2M | 6% |
| Other Services | $9.3M | 4% |
