vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of TIC Solutions, Inc. (TIC) and TripAdvisor, Inc. (TRIP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
TIC Solutions, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($508.3M vs $411.0M, roughly 1.2× TripAdvisor, Inc.). TripAdvisor, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -9.2% vs -9.3%, a 0.0% gap on every dollar of revenue. TIC Solutions, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($37.1M vs $-122.0M).
Tripadvisor is an American company that operates online travel agencies, comparison shopping websites, and mobile apps with user-generated content.
TIC vs TRIP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $508.3M | $411.0M |
| Net Profit | $-47.2M | $-38.0M |
| Gross Margin | 35.2% | 91.5% |
| Operating Margin | -3.8% | -8.3% |
| Net Margin | -9.3% | -9.2% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 0.0% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -3900.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $-0.32 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $508.3M | $411.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $473.9M | $553.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $313.9M | $529.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $234.2M | $398.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $411.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $532.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $497.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $395.0M |
| Q4 25 | $-47.2M | $-38.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-13.9M | $53.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-233.0K | $36.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-25.8M | $-11.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $39.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $24.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-59.0M |
| Q4 25 | 35.2% | 91.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 32.2% | 92.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.6% | 92.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.6% | 93.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 93.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 92.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 92.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 93.7% |
| Q4 25 | -3.8% | -8.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.4% | 12.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.8% | 11.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.0% | -3.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 13.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 7.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -3.8% |
| Q4 25 | -9.3% | -9.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.9% | 9.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.1% | 6.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -11.0% | -2.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 7.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -14.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | $-0.32 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.08 | $0.43 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.28 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.08 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.03 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.27 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.17 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-0.43 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $439.5M | $1.0B |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.6B | $819.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.2B | $645.0M |
| Total Assets | $4.4B | $2.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.74× | 1.27× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $439.5M | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $164.4M | $1.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | $130.1M | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $155.7M | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.2B |
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | $819.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | $821.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $751.3M | $822.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $752.4M | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $831.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $832.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | $2.2B | $645.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0B | $707.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $627.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $643.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $943.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $944.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $857.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $825.0M |
| Q4 25 | $4.4B | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.2B | $2.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | $2.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.2B | $2.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.6B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.7B |
| Q4 25 | 0.74× | 1.27× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.83× | 1.16× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.64× | 1.31× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.67× | 1.81× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 0.88× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.88× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $49.7M | $-103.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $37.1M | $-122.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 7.3% | -29.7% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.5% | 4.6% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $61.3M | $163.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $49.7M | $-103.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $19.0M | $44.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-6.5M | $202.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $32.8M | $102.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-3.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-43.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $51.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $139.0M |
| Q4 25 | $37.1M | $-122.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.3M | $25.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-14.5M | $177.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $28.3M | $83.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-26.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-63.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $36.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $123.0M |
| Q4 25 | 7.3% | -29.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.2% | 4.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | -4.6% | 33.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.1% | 20.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -6.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -11.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 7.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 31.1% |
| Q4 25 | 2.5% | 4.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.8% | 3.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.6% | 4.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.9% | 4.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 5.6% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 3.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 3.0% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 4.1% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.83× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 5.61× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | -3.00× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -1.10× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 2.13× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
TIC
| Consulting Engineering Segment | $300.1M | 59% |
| Geospatial Segment | $131.3M | 26% |
| Fixed Unit Price Contracts | $54.3M | 11% |
| Other | $22.6M | 4% |
TRIP
| Third Party | $327.0M | 80% |
| The Fork | $58.0M | 14% |
| Other | $26.0M | 6% |