vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of TIC Solutions, Inc. (TIC) and UNISYS CORP (UIS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
UNISYS CORP is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($574.5M vs $508.3M, roughly 1.1× TIC Solutions, Inc.). UNISYS CORP runs the higher net margin — 3.3% vs -9.3%, a 12.5% gap on every dollar of revenue. UNISYS CORP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($97.3M vs $37.1M).
Unisys Corporation is a technology company founded in 1986 and headquartered in Blue Bell, Pennsylvania. The company provides cloud, AI, digital workplace, logistics, and enterprise computing services.
TIC vs UIS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $508.3M | $574.5M |
| Net Profit | $-47.2M | $18.7M |
| Gross Margin | 35.2% | 33.9% |
| Operating Margin | -3.8% | 13.3% |
| Net Margin | -9.3% | 3.3% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 5.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -37.7% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.24 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $508.3M | $574.5M | ||
| Q3 25 | $473.9M | $460.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $313.9M | $483.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $234.2M | $432.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $545.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $497.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $478.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $487.8M |
| Q4 25 | $-47.2M | $18.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $-13.9M | $-308.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-233.0K | $-20.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-25.8M | $-29.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $30.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-61.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-12.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-149.5M |
| Q4 25 | 35.2% | 33.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 32.2% | 25.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.6% | 26.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 18.6% | 24.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 32.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 29.2% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 27.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 27.9% |
| Q4 25 | -3.8% | 13.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.4% | -7.3% | ||
| Q2 25 | 5.8% | 6.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -4.0% | 1.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 8.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 4.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.6% |
| Q4 25 | -9.3% | 3.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | -2.9% | -67.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.1% | -4.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | -11.0% | -6.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 5.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | -12.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -2.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -30.6% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.24 | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.08 | $-4.33 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-0.28 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $-0.42 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.45 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-0.89 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-0.17 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-2.18 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $439.5M | $413.9M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $1.6B | $729.0M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $2.2B | $-282.6M |
| Total Assets | $4.4B | $1.8B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.74× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $439.5M | $413.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $164.4M | $321.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $130.1M | $300.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $155.7M | $393.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $376.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $373.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $344.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $382.8M |
| Q4 25 | $1.6B | $729.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | $723.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $751.3M | $692.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $752.4M | $488.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $488.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $488.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $489.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $488.4M |
| Q4 25 | $2.2B | $-282.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.0B | $-300.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.2B | $-221.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $-267.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $-283.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $-202.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-174.1M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-158.6M |
| Q4 25 | $4.4B | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.2B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.2B | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.2B | $1.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $1.9B |
| Q4 25 | 0.74× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.83× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.64× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.67× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $49.7M | $104.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $37.1M | $97.3M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 7.3% | 16.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 2.5% | 1.3% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | 5.61× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $61.3M | $-170.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $49.7M | $104.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $19.0M | $38.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-6.5M | $-316.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $32.8M | $33.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $76.6M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $32.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $23.8M |
| Q4 25 | $37.1M | $97.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | $10.3M | $32.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-14.5M | $-324.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $28.3M | $24.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $66.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $25.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-6.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $17.1M |
| Q4 25 | 7.3% | 16.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.2% | 7.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | -4.6% | -67.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.1% | 5.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 12.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 5.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -1.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 3.5% |
| Q4 25 | 2.5% | 1.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.8% | 1.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.6% | 1.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.9% | 2.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | 5.61× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 2.55× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
TIC
| Consulting Engineering Segment | $300.1M | 59% |
| Geospatial Segment | $131.3M | 26% |
| Fixed Unit Price Contracts | $54.3M | 11% |
| Other | $22.6M | 4% |
UIS
Segment breakdown not available.
