vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Kartoon Studios, Inc. (TOON) and Venus Concept Inc. (VERO). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Venus Concept Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($13.8M vs $9.7M, roughly 1.4× Kartoon Studios, Inc.). Kartoon Studios, Inc. runs the higher net margin — -54.4% vs -163.8%, a 109.4% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Kartoon Studios, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (2.9% vs -8.2%). Kartoon Studios, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($346.0K vs $-4.9M). Over the past eight quarters, Kartoon Studios, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (26.3% CAGR vs -12.8%).
Kartoon Studios, Inc. is an entertainment company headed by Andy Heyward. The company was formed in 2010 as Genius Brands International (GBI) from the merger of Genius Brands International and A Squared Entertainment.
Venus Concept Inc is a global medical technology firm specializing in the development, manufacturing, and distribution of non-invasive and minimally invasive aesthetic medical devices. Its product portfolio covers hair removal, skin rejuvenation, body contouring, and anti-aging solutions, serving dermatology clinics, plastic surgery centers, and medical spas across North America, Europe, and Asia Pacific markets.
TOON vs VERO — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2025 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $9.7M | $13.8M |
| Net Profit | $-5.3M | $-22.6M |
| Gross Margin | — | 64.0% |
| Operating Margin | -38.4% | -68.9% |
| Net Margin | -54.4% | -163.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 2.9% | -8.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | 8.5% | -143.0% |
| EPS (diluted) | $-0.08 | $-12.14 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $9.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $9.9M | $13.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $10.3M | $15.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $9.5M | $13.6M | ||
| Q4 24 | $9.4M | $15.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $8.7M | $15.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $8.4M | $16.6M | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.1M | $17.5M |
| Q4 25 | $-5.3M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-6.6M | $-22.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-6.2M | $-11.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-6.5M | $-12.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-5.8M | $-8.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $-2.1M | $-9.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-5.9M | $-20.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $-7.0M | $-9.8M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 64.0% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 60.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 64.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 69.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 66.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 71.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 66.6% |
| Q4 25 | -38.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -29.3% | -68.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | -31.3% | -57.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | -32.4% | -69.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | -37.1% | -42.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | -29.2% | -47.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | -55.6% | -33.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | -103.6% | -44.4% |
| Q4 25 | -54.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -66.5% | -163.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -60.0% | -74.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | -68.7% | -90.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | -61.2% | -50.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | -23.6% | -61.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -70.1% | -120.3% | ||
| Q1 24 | -115.9% | -56.0% |
| Q4 25 | $-0.08 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.14 | $-12.14 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.13 | $-8.03 | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.14 | $-17.44 | ||
| Q4 24 | $-0.14 | $-10.26 | ||
| Q3 24 | $-0.05 | $-13.10 | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.15 | $-30.93 | ||
| Q1 24 | $-0.20 | $-16.92 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | — | $4.3M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $26.2M | $2.7M |
| Total Assets | $70.9M | $61.6M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $4.3M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $3.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $100.0K | $4.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $5.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $5.1M |
| Q4 25 | $26.2M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.6M | $2.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $28.4M | $2.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $28.6M | $2.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $35.0M | $2.4M | ||
| Q3 24 | $41.2M | $10.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $42.7M | $3.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | $44.8M | $-22.5M |
| Q4 25 | $70.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $66.7M | $61.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $70.0M | $63.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $71.7M | $63.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $85.5M | $68.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $87.3M | $72.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $89.0M | $79.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | $93.3M | $85.1M |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $381.0K | $-4.9M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $346.0K | $-4.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 3.6% | -35.6% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.4% | 0.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-11.6M | $-20.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $381.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-5.5M | $-4.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.5M | $-5.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.8M | $-6.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.4M | $-3.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5M | $-3.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-6.5M | $-1.3M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.8M | $-2.9M |
| Q4 25 | $346.0K | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-5.5M | $-4.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-4.5M | $-5.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-1.8M | $-6.3M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-2.4M | $-3.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5M | $-3.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-1.4M | ||
| Q1 24 | $3.8M | $-2.9M |
| Q4 25 | 3.6% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -56.0% | -35.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | -44.1% | -35.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -19.4% | -46.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | -25.6% | -24.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 17.1% | -20.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -8.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 62.7% | -16.6% |
| Q4 25 | 0.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.4% | 0.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.6% | 1.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.2% | 0.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.5% | 0.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.4% | 0.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.0% | 0.1% | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.6% | 0.1% |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
TOON
| Other | $4.6M | 48% |
| CA | $2.8M | 29% |
| Content Distribution | $2.2M | 23% |
VERO
| Products And Services | $10.8M | 79% |
| Leases | $2.9M | 21% |