vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Tapestry, Inc. (TPR) and WEC Energy Group (WEC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
WEC Energy Group is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.5B vs $2.5B, roughly 1.0× Tapestry, Inc.). Tapestry, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 22.4% vs 12.5%, a 9.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Tapestry, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (14.0% vs 11.1%). Over the past eight quarters, Tapestry, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (29.9% CAGR vs -2.7%).
Tapestry, Inc. is a leading American multinational luxury fashion holding company. It owns three iconic lifestyle brands: Coach, Kate Spade New York, and Stuart Weitzman, offering premium handbags, apparel, footwear, accessories, and fragrances to global consumers via physical retail stores and e-commerce platforms.
WEC Energy Group is an American energy company based in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. It provides electricity and natural gas to 4.4 million customers across four states.
TPR vs WEC — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.5B | $2.5B |
| Net Profit | $561.3M | $316.8M |
| Gross Margin | 75.5% | 63.7% |
| Operating Margin | 28.6% | 17.9% |
| Net Margin | 22.4% | 12.5% |
| Revenue YoY | 14.0% | 11.1% |
| Net Profit YoY | 80.8% | -30.1% |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.68 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.5B | $2.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $2.1B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $2.0B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $3.1B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2B | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $1.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $1.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.5B | $2.7B |
| Q4 25 | $561.3M | $316.8M | ||
| Q3 25 | $274.8M | $270.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-517.1M | $243.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $203.3M | $725.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $310.4M | $453.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | $186.6M | $238.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $159.3M | $210.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $139.4M | $622.6M |
| Q4 25 | 75.5% | 63.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 76.3% | 71.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 76.3% | 71.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 76.1% | 63.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 74.4% | 67.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 75.3% | 72.1% | ||
| Q2 24 | 74.9% | 73.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 74.7% | 65.4% |
| Q4 25 | 28.6% | 17.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.3% | 21.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | -33.9% | 20.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.0% | 29.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.4% | 25.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.7% | 20.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.8% | 20.6% | ||
| Q1 24 | 13.8% | 30.3% |
| Q4 25 | 22.4% | 12.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.1% | 12.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -30.0% | 12.1% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.8% | 23.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.1% | 19.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.4% | 12.8% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.0% | 11.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.4% | 23.2% |
| Q4 25 | $2.68 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.28 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.30 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.95 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.38 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.79 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.67 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.60 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.1B | $27.6M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.4B | $20.0B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $551.2M | $14.1B |
| Total Assets | $6.5B | $51.5B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 4.32× | 1.42× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $27.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $743.2M | $51.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $23.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $82.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.0B | $9.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.3B | $322.5M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.2B | $224.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.4B | $38.9M |
| Q4 25 | $2.4B | $20.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4B | $18.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.0B | $16.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.9B | $16.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.7B | $15.4B |
| Q4 25 | $551.2M | $14.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $399.5M | $14.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $857.8M | $13.7B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $13.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $12.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.0B | $12.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.9B | $12.4B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.8B | $12.4B |
| Q4 25 | $6.5B | $51.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.4B | $49.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.6B | $48.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.3B | $48.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.3B | $47.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.7B | $45.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.4B | $44.6B | ||
| Q1 24 | $13.7B | $43.9B |
| Q4 25 | 4.32× | 1.42× | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.95× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.77× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.59× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.78× | 1.48× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.35× | 1.36× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.39× | 1.36× | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.77× | 1.24× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.1B | $424.6M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $1.0B | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 41.5% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.7% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.93× | 1.34× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $1.6B | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $424.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $112.6M | $938.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $446.8M | $853.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $144.3M | $1.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $506.0M | $581.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $119.5M | $729.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $256.0M | $1.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $97.8M | $863.6M |
| Q4 25 | $1.0B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $80.2M | $-625.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $411.5M | $23.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $113.4M | $461.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $475.1M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $93.9M | $-67.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $209.8M | $343.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | $78.8M | $419.1M |
| Q4 25 | 41.5% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.7% | -29.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.9% | 1.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.2% | 14.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.6% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.2% | -3.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.2% | 19.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.3% | 15.6% |
| Q4 25 | 1.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.9% | 74.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.0% | 41.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.0% | 22.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.4% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.7% | 42.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.9% | 39.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.3% | 16.6% |
| Q4 25 | 1.93× | 1.34× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.41× | 3.47× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 3.51× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.71× | 1.60× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.63× | 1.28× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.64× | 3.06× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.61× | 4.94× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.70× | 1.39× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
TPR
| Coach | $1.4B | 57% |
| Other | $787.0M | 31% |
| Kate Spade Company | $290.0M | 12% |
WEC
| Wisconsin | $1.9B | 73% |
| Illinois | $441.2M | 17% |
| Other States | $165.1M | 7% |
| External Revenues | $74.0M | 3% |
| Otheroperatingrevenues | $8.0M | 0% |
