vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Tapestry, Inc. (TPR) and Weyerhaeuser (WY). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Tapestry, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.5B vs $1.5B, roughly 1.6× Weyerhaeuser). Tapestry, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 22.4% vs 4.8%, a 17.6% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Tapestry, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (14.0% vs -9.8%). Tapestry, Inc. produced more free cash flow last quarter ($1.0B vs $-128.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Tapestry, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (29.9% CAGR vs -7.4%).
Tapestry, Inc. is a leading American multinational luxury fashion holding company. It owns three iconic lifestyle brands: Coach, Kate Spade New York, and Stuart Weitzman, offering premium handbags, apparel, footwear, accessories, and fragrances to global consumers via physical retail stores and e-commerce platforms.
The Weyerhaeuser Company is an American timberland company which owns approximately 10,400,000 acres of timberlands in the U.S., and manages an additional 14,000,000 acres of timberlands under long-term licenses in Canada. The company has manufactured wood products for over a century. It operates as a real estate investment trust (REIT).
TPR vs WY — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q2 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.5B | $1.5B |
| Net Profit | $561.3M | $74.0M |
| Gross Margin | 75.5% | 10.4% |
| Operating Margin | 28.6% | 16.3% |
| Net Margin | 22.4% | 4.8% |
| Revenue YoY | 14.0% | -9.8% |
| Net Profit YoY | 80.8% | -8.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | $2.68 | $0.11 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $2.5B | $1.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.7B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.6B | $1.8B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.2B | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.5B | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.6B | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.5B | $1.8B |
| Q4 25 | $561.3M | $74.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $274.8M | $80.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-517.1M | $87.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $203.3M | $83.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $310.4M | $81.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $186.6M | $28.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $159.3M | $173.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $139.4M | $114.0M |
| Q4 25 | 75.5% | 10.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | 76.3% | 11.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 76.3% | 17.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | 76.1% | 19.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 74.4% | 17.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 75.3% | 14.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 74.9% | 20.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 74.7% | 19.8% |
| Q4 25 | 28.6% | 16.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 19.3% | 7.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -33.9% | 9.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 16.0% | 10.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 22.4% | 8.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 16.7% | 4.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.8% | 13.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 13.8% | 10.9% |
| Q4 25 | 22.4% | 4.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.1% | 4.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | -30.0% | 4.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 12.8% | 4.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.1% | 4.7% | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.4% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.0% | 8.9% | ||
| Q1 24 | 9.4% | 6.3% |
| Q4 25 | $2.68 | $0.11 | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.28 | $0.11 | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.30 | $0.12 | ||
| Q1 25 | $0.95 | $0.11 | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.38 | $0.10 | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.79 | $0.04 | ||
| Q2 24 | $0.67 | $0.24 | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.60 | $0.16 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $1.1B | $464.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $2.4B | $5.6B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $551.2M | $9.4B |
| Total Assets | $6.5B | $16.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 4.32× | 0.59× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $464.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $743.2M | $401.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $592.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.1B | $560.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.0B | $684.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.3B | $877.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $7.2B | $997.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.4B | $871.0M |
| Q4 25 | $2.4B | $5.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.4B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.4B | $5.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | $7.0B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.9B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $7.7B | — |
| Q4 25 | $551.2M | $9.4B | ||
| Q3 25 | $399.5M | $9.4B | ||
| Q2 25 | $857.8M | $9.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.5B | $9.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.3B | $9.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.0B | $9.9B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.9B | $10.0B | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.8B | $10.1B |
| Q4 25 | $6.5B | $16.6B | ||
| Q3 25 | $6.4B | $16.7B | ||
| Q2 25 | $6.6B | $16.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | $7.3B | $16.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | $7.3B | $16.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | $13.7B | $16.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $13.4B | $16.8B | ||
| Q1 24 | $13.7B | $16.8B |
| Q4 25 | 4.32× | 0.59× | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.95× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.77× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 1.59× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.78× | 0.52× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.35× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.39× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.77× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $1.1B | $-114.0M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $1.0B | $-128.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 41.5% | -8.3% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.7% | 0.9% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.93× | -1.54× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $1.6B | $511.0M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $-114.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $112.6M | $210.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $446.8M | $396.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $144.3M | $70.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $506.0M | $218.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $119.5M | $234.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $256.0M | $432.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $97.8M | $124.0M |
| Q4 25 | $1.0B | $-128.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $80.2M | $203.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $411.5M | $388.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $113.4M | $48.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $475.1M | $205.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | $93.9M | $226.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $209.8M | $423.0M | ||
| Q1 24 | $78.8M | $102.0M |
| Q4 25 | 41.5% | -8.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 4.7% | 11.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | 23.9% | 20.6% | ||
| Q1 25 | 7.2% | 2.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 21.6% | 12.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 6.2% | 13.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 13.2% | 21.8% | ||
| Q1 24 | 5.3% | 5.7% |
| Q4 25 | 1.7% | 0.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.9% | 0.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.0% | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.0% | 1.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.4% | 0.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 1.7% | 0.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.9% | 0.5% | ||
| Q1 24 | 1.3% | 1.2% |
| Q4 25 | 1.93× | -1.54× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.41× | 2.63× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 4.55× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.71× | 0.84× | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.63× | 2.69× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.64× | 8.36× | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.61× | 2.50× | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.70× | 1.09× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
TPR
| Coach | $1.4B | 57% |
| Other | $787.0M | 31% |
| Kate Spade Company | $290.0M | 12% |
WY
Segment breakdown not available.
