vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Telesat Corp (TSAT) and Waterstone Financial, Inc. (WSBF). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Telesat Corp is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($73.8M vs $37.2M, roughly 2.0× Waterstone Financial, Inc.). Over the past eight quarters, Waterstone Financial, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (7.1% CAGR vs -64.0%).
Telesat, formerly Telesat Canada, is a Canadian satellite communications company founded on May 2, 1969. The company is headquartered in Ottawa.
Waterstone Financial, Inc. is a U.S. bank holding company headquartered in Wisconsin. It offers retail and commercial banking services, residential mortgages, and wealth management solutions, primarily serving consumers and small to medium-sized businesses across the U.S. Midwest region.
TSAT vs WSBF — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2025 vs Q4 FY2025
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $73.8M | $37.2M |
| Net Profit | $-88.4M | — |
| Gross Margin | 95.3% | — |
| Operating Margin | 5.9% | 27.0% |
| Net Margin | -119.8% | — |
| Revenue YoY | — | 16.7% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | — |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $0.43 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | — | $37.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | $73.8M | $37.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $77.5M | $38.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $152.2M | $29.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $31.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $34.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $363.2M | $37.2M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $32.4M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-88.4M | $7.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $55.1M | $7.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-52.3M | $3.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $4.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $547.4M | $5.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $3.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 95.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 95.9% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | 27.0% | ||
| Q3 25 | 5.9% | 26.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.8% | 25.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 13.1% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 19.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 17.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 19.2% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 14.7% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -119.8% | 21.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 71.2% | 20.3% | ||
| Q1 25 | -34.4% | 10.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 13.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | 150.7% | 15.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 9.4% |
| Q4 25 | — | $0.43 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $0.45 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.43 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.17 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $0.28 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $0.26 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $0.31 | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $0.16 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $352.3M | — |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $412.3M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.6B | $349.4M |
| Total Assets | $5.1B | $2.3B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 1.18× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $352.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $399.6M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $552.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.7B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | — | — |
| Q4 25 | — | $412.3M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $469.1M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $465.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $395.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $446.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $560.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $660.8M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $634.2M |
| Q4 25 | — | $349.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | $345.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.7B | $341.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | $2.5B | $341.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $339.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $342.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.4B | $334.9M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $338.0M |
| Q4 25 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.1B | $2.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.9B | $2.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | $6.9B | $2.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q2 24 | $6.3B | $2.3B | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $2.2B |
| Q4 25 | — | 1.18× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.36× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.36× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.16× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.32× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.64× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.97× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.88× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | — | $24.2M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | — | $23.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | — | 61.9% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 3.1% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | — | $43.4M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | — | $24.2M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $32.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-38.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $26.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $48.1M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $74.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-39.5M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-9.9M |
| Q4 25 | — | $23.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $32.4M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $-38.5M | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $26.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $47.0M | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $73.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $-39.7M | ||
| Q1 24 | — | $-10.3M |
| Q4 25 | — | 61.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 87.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -101.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 89.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 147.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 216.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -106.7% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -31.9% |
| Q4 25 | — | 3.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 0.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 0.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 0.9% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 3.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 0.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 0.4% | ||
| Q1 24 | — | 1.2% |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 4.13× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | -4.98× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 8.81× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 15.67× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | -6.92× | ||
| Q1 24 | — | -3.27× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
