vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Tennessee Valley Authority (TVE) and Zimmer Biomet (ZBH). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Tennessee Valley Authority is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($3.0B vs $2.1B, roughly 1.5× Zimmer Biomet). Zimmer Biomet runs the higher net margin — 11.4% vs 8.7%, a 2.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Zimmer Biomet posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (9.3% vs 4.4%). Zimmer Biomet produced more free cash flow last quarter ($245.9M vs $-814.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Zimmer Biomet's revenue compounded faster (3.7% CAGR vs -1.7%).
The Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) is a federally-owned electric utility corporation in the United States. TVA's service area covers all of Tennessee, portions of Alabama, Mississippi, and Kentucky, and small areas of Georgia, North Carolina, and Virginia. While owned by the federal government, TVA receives no taxpayer funding and operates similarly to a private for-profit company. It is headquartered in Knoxville, Tennessee, and is the sixth-largest power supplier and largest public utilit...
Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. is a publicly traded American medical device company. It was founded in 1927 to produce aluminum splints. The firm is headquartered in Warsaw, Indiana, where it is part of the medical devices business cluster.
TVE vs ZBH — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $3.0B | $2.1B |
| Net Profit | $266.0M | $238.3M |
| Gross Margin | — | 64.6% |
| Operating Margin | 18.1% | 17.9% |
| Net Margin | 8.7% | 11.4% |
| Revenue YoY | 4.4% | 9.3% |
| Net Profit YoY | 112.8% | 30.5% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $1.22 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $2.1B | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.0B | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.9B | $2.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.3B | $2.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.5B | $1.9B | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.9B | $2.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.5B | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | $2.9B | $1.9B |
| Q1 26 | — | $238.3M | ||
| Q4 25 | $266.0M | $139.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $615.0M | $230.9M | ||
| Q2 25 | $212.0M | $152.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $408.0M | $182.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $125.0M | $239.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $520.0M | $249.1M | ||
| Q2 24 | $181.0M | $242.8M |
| Q1 26 | — | 64.6% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 64.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 72.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 71.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 71.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 71.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 70.5% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 71.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | 17.9% | ||
| Q4 25 | 18.1% | 6.9% | ||
| Q3 25 | 23.6% | 17.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.6% | 14.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 20.3% | 15.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 14.1% | 19.2% | ||
| Q3 24 | 22.7% | 15.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 15.9% | 18.1% |
| Q1 26 | — | 11.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | 8.7% | 6.2% | ||
| Q3 25 | 15.7% | 11.5% | ||
| Q2 25 | 6.4% | 7.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 11.6% | 9.5% | ||
| Q4 24 | 4.3% | 11.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.8% | 13.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 6.3% | 12.5% |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.22 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $0.71 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.16 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $0.77 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $0.91 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.18 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.23 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.18 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $501.0M | $424.2M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $7.5B |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | — | $12.7B |
| Total Assets | $59.5B | $22.7B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.59× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $424.2M | ||
| Q4 25 | $501.0M | $591.9M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.6B | $1.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | $501.0M | $556.9M | ||
| Q1 25 | $502.0M | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | $507.0M | $525.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $502.0M | $569.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | $501.0M | $420.1M |
| Q1 26 | — | $7.5B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $22.1B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $19.1B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
| Q1 26 | — | $12.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $12.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $12.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $12.5B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $12.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $12.5B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $12.4B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $12.7B |
| Q1 26 | — | $22.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | $59.5B | $23.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | $60.9B | $23.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | $59.9B | $22.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | $59.3B | $22.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | $58.4B | $21.4B | ||
| Q3 24 | $57.7B | $21.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | $56.2B | $21.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | 0.59× | ||
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | — | — | ||
| Q3 24 | — | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $330.0M | $359.4M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-814.0M | $245.9M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -26.7% | 11.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 37.5% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.24× | 1.51× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-1.2B | $1.4B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $359.4M | ||
| Q4 25 | $330.0M | $517.4M | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | $418.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $615.0M | $378.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.0B | $382.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $450.0M | $506.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.1B | $395.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $508.0M | $369.4M |
| Q1 26 | — | $245.9M | ||
| Q4 25 | $-814.0M | $442.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $233.0M | $363.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-431.0M | $328.1M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-176.0M | $338.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $-759.0M | $454.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $164.0M | $351.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-248.0M | $316.7M |
| Q1 26 | — | 11.8% | ||
| Q4 25 | -26.7% | 19.7% | ||
| Q3 25 | 6.0% | 18.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | -13.0% | 15.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.0% | 17.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | -26.0% | 22.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 4.7% | 19.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | -8.6% | 16.3% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 37.5% | 3.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 25.9% | 2.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 31.6% | 2.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 33.6% | 2.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | 41.4% | 2.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 25.6% | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 26.3% | 2.7% |
| Q1 26 | — | 1.51× | ||
| Q4 25 | 1.24× | 3.71× | ||
| Q3 25 | 2.03× | 1.81× | ||
| Q2 25 | 2.90× | 2.48× | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.48× | 2.10× | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.60× | 2.11× | ||
| Q3 24 | 2.05× | 1.59× | ||
| Q2 24 | 2.81× | 1.52× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
TVE
| TN | $2.0B | 65% |
| AL | $449.0M | 15% |
| MS | $266.0M | 9% |
| KY | $193.0M | 6% |
| GA | $75.0M | 2% |
| Federal Agencies And Other | $29.0M | 1% |
| NC | $23.0M | 1% |
| VA | $12.0M | 0% |
| Off System Sales Member | $2.0M | 0% |
ZBH
Segment breakdown not available.
