vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Texas Roadhouse, Inc. (TXRH) and Yum China Holdings, Inc. (YUMC). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Yum China Holdings, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($2.8B vs $1.5B, roughly 1.9× Texas Roadhouse, Inc.). Texas Roadhouse, Inc. runs the higher net margin — 5.8% vs 5.0%, a 0.9% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Yum China Holdings, Inc. posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (8.8% vs 3.1%). Over the past eight quarters, Texas Roadhouse, Inc.'s revenue compounded faster (12.8% CAGR vs -2.3%).

Texas Roadhouse is an American steakhouse chain that specializes in steaks in a Texan and Southwestern cuisine style. It is a subsidiary of Texas Roadhouse Inc, which has two other concepts and is headquartered in Louisville, Kentucky. As of August 2025, the chain operates about 800 locations in 49 U.S. states and 70 international locations in 11 countries.

Yum China Holdings, Inc. is an American-Chinese Fortune 500 fast-food restaurant company based in Shanghai, China. With US$9.5 billion in revenue and 10,600 restaurants worldwide it is one of the largest restaurant companies. It was spun off from Yum! Brands in 2016, becoming an independent, publicly traded company on November 1, 2016. Yum China is a trademark licensee of Yum Brands, paying 3% of total systemwide sales to Yum Brands. It operates 8,484 restaurants in over 1,100 cities located ...

TXRH vs YUMC — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
YUMC
YUMC
1.9× larger
YUMC
$2.8B
$1.5B
TXRH
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
YUMC
YUMC
+5.7% gap
YUMC
8.8%
3.1%
TXRH
Higher net margin
TXRH
TXRH
0.9% more per $
TXRH
5.8%
5.0%
YUMC
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
TXRH
TXRH
Annualised
TXRH
12.8%
-2.3%
YUMC

Income Statement — Q4 2025 vs Q4 2025

Metric
TXRH
TXRH
YUMC
YUMC
Revenue
$1.5B
$2.8B
Net Profit
$86.7M
$140.0M
Gross Margin
Operating Margin
6.5%
6.6%
Net Margin
5.8%
5.0%
Revenue YoY
3.1%
8.8%
Net Profit YoY
-26.9%
21.7%
EPS (diluted)
$1.29
$0.40

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
TXRH
TXRH
YUMC
YUMC
Q4 25
$1.5B
$2.8B
Q3 25
$1.4B
$3.2B
Q2 25
$1.4B
$2.8B
Q1 25
$3.0B
Q4 24
$1.4B
$2.6B
Q3 24
$1.3B
$3.1B
Q2 24
$1.3B
$2.7B
Q1 24
$1.3B
$3.0B
Net Profit
TXRH
TXRH
YUMC
YUMC
Q4 25
$86.7M
$140.0M
Q3 25
$84.9M
$282.0M
Q2 25
$116.1M
$215.0M
Q1 25
$292.0M
Q4 24
$118.5M
$115.0M
Q3 24
$86.8M
$297.0M
Q2 24
$123.1M
$212.0M
Q1 24
$116.0M
$287.0M
Operating Margin
TXRH
TXRH
YUMC
YUMC
Q4 25
6.5%
6.6%
Q3 25
6.7%
12.5%
Q2 25
9.3%
10.9%
Q1 25
13.4%
Q4 24
9.6%
5.8%
Q3 24
8.0%
12.1%
Q2 24
10.6%
9.9%
Q1 24
10.1%
12.6%
Net Margin
TXRH
TXRH
YUMC
YUMC
Q4 25
5.8%
5.0%
Q3 25
5.9%
8.8%
Q2 25
8.0%
7.7%
Q1 25
9.8%
Q4 24
8.2%
4.4%
Q3 24
6.8%
9.7%
Q2 24
9.2%
7.9%
Q1 24
8.8%
9.7%
EPS (diluted)
TXRH
TXRH
YUMC
YUMC
Q4 25
$1.29
$0.40
Q3 25
$1.25
$0.76
Q2 25
$1.70
$0.58
Q1 25
$0.77
Q4 24
$1.73
$0.30
Q3 24
$1.26
$0.77
Q2 24
$1.79
$0.55
Q1 24
$1.69
$0.71

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
TXRH
TXRH
YUMC
YUMC
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$134.7M
$1.4B
Total DebtLower is stronger
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$1.5B
$5.4B
Total Assets
$3.5B
$10.8B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
TXRH
TXRH
YUMC
YUMC
Q4 25
$134.7M
$1.4B
Q3 25
$108.2M
$2.1B
Q2 25
$221.1M
$2.2B
Q1 25
$2.0B
Q4 24
$245.2M
$1.8B
Q3 24
$189.2M
$2.5B
Q2 24
$197.5M
$2.5B
Q1 24
$213.4M
$2.4B
Stockholders' Equity
TXRH
TXRH
YUMC
YUMC
Q4 25
$1.5B
$5.4B
Q3 25
$1.5B
$5.7B
Q2 25
$1.4B
$5.8B
Q1 25
$5.8B
Q4 24
$1.4B
$5.7B
Q3 24
$1.3B
$6.0B
Q2 24
$1.3B
$5.8B
Q1 24
$1.2B
$5.9B
Total Assets
TXRH
TXRH
YUMC
YUMC
Q4 25
$3.5B
$10.8B
Q3 25
$3.3B
$11.0B
Q2 25
$3.2B
$11.0B
Q1 25
$11.0B
Q4 24
$3.2B
$11.1B
Q3 24
$2.9B
$11.8B
Q2 24
$2.9B
$11.6B
Q1 24
$2.8B
$11.3B

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
TXRH
TXRH
YUMC
YUMC
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$125.0M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$-116.0M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
-4.1%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
8.5%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
0.89×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$840.0M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
TXRH
TXRH
YUMC
YUMC
Q4 25
$125.0M
Q3 25
$143.6M
$477.0M
Q2 25
$237.7M
$412.0M
Q1 25
$452.0M
Q4 24
$237.5M
$167.0M
Q3 24
$138.7M
$409.0M
Q2 24
$133.9M
$401.0M
Q1 24
$243.4M
$442.0M
Free Cash Flow
TXRH
TXRH
YUMC
YUMC
Q4 25
$-116.0M
Q3 25
$14.7M
$351.0M
Q2 25
$160.4M
$290.0M
Q1 25
$315.0M
Q4 24
$129.7M
$-15.0M
Q3 24
$47.7M
$244.0M
Q2 24
$56.1M
$232.0M
Q1 24
$165.8M
$253.0M
FCF Margin
TXRH
TXRH
YUMC
YUMC
Q4 25
-4.1%
Q3 25
1.0%
10.9%
Q2 25
11.1%
10.4%
Q1 25
10.6%
Q4 24
9.0%
-0.6%
Q3 24
3.7%
7.9%
Q2 24
4.2%
8.7%
Q1 24
12.5%
8.6%
Capex Intensity
TXRH
TXRH
YUMC
YUMC
Q4 25
8.5%
Q3 25
9.0%
3.9%
Q2 25
5.3%
4.4%
Q1 25
4.6%
Q4 24
7.5%
7.0%
Q3 24
7.2%
5.4%
Q2 24
5.8%
6.3%
Q1 24
5.9%
6.4%
Cash Conversion
TXRH
TXRH
YUMC
YUMC
Q4 25
0.89×
Q3 25
1.69×
1.69×
Q2 25
2.05×
1.92×
Q1 25
1.55×
Q4 24
2.00×
1.45×
Q3 24
1.60×
1.38×
Q2 24
1.09×
1.89×
Q1 24
2.10×
1.54×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

TXRH
TXRH

Food And Beverage$1.5B99%
Texas Roadhouse Segment$21.2M1%
Franchise$8.2M1%
Franchise Royalty$7.4M0%
Bubba S33Segment$2.3M0%

YUMC
YUMC

Revenue From External Customers$2.1B75%
Pizza Hut$540.0M19%
Corporate And Unallocated$105.0M4%
Other Revenue$45.0M2%
Franchise Fees And Income$25.0M1%

Related Comparisons