vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of TIGO ENERGY, INC. (TYGO) and Union Pacific Corporation (UNP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
TIGO ENERGY, INC. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($9.2B vs $6.2B, roughly 1.5× Union Pacific Corporation). Union Pacific Corporation produced more free cash flow last quarter ($631.0M vs $-39.3M).
Tigo Energy is an American private corporation, headquartered in Los Gatos, California, United States. It provides products, technologies, software, and services to installers, distributors, and original equipment manufacturers within the photovoltaic industry. It specializes in module-level power optimizers and smart module power electronics.
The Union Pacific Railroad Company is a Class I freight-hauling railroad that operates 8,300 locomotives over 32,200 miles (51,800 km) routes in 23 U.S. states west of Chicago and New Orleans. Union Pacific is the second-largest railroad in the United States after BNSF.
TYGO vs UNP — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q4 FY2023 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $9.2B | $6.2B |
| Net Profit | — | $1.7B |
| Gross Margin | 0.0% | — |
| Operating Margin | — | 39.5% |
| Net Margin | — | 27.4% |
| Revenue YoY | — | 3.2% |
| Net Profit YoY | -1736.1% | 4.6% |
| EPS (diluted) | — | $2.87 |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | — | $6.2B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $6.1B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $6.2B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $6.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $6.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $6.1B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $6.1B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $6.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.9B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.7B |
| Q1 26 | — | 39.5% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 39.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 40.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 41.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 39.3% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 41.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 39.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 40.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | 27.4% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 30.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 28.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 30.5% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 27.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 28.8% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 27.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 27.9% |
| Q1 26 | — | $2.87 | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $3.12 | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $3.01 | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $3.15 | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.70 | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.91 | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.75 | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $2.74 |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $31.2M | $735.0M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $50.0M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $62.8M | — |
| Total Assets | $127.8M | $69.6B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.80× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | $735.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $808.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.1B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $947.0M | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.1B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $30.3B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $30.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $30.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $30.6B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $29.8B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $29.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $31.2B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $18.5B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $17.3B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $16.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $16.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $16.9B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $16.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $16.5B |
| Q1 26 | — | $69.6B | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $69.7B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $68.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $68.6B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $68.5B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $67.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $67.6B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $67.8B |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.64× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.75× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.86× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.91× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.76× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.79× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.89× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $-37.2M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $-39.3M | $631.0M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | -0.4% | 10.1% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 0.0% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-70.6M | $4.8B |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $2.5B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $2.3B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $2.2B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $2.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $2.7B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.9B |
| Q1 26 | — | $631.0M | ||
| Q4 25 | — | $1.2B | ||
| Q3 25 | — | $1.6B | ||
| Q2 25 | — | $1.4B | ||
| Q1 25 | — | $1.3B | ||
| Q4 24 | — | $1.7B | ||
| Q3 24 | — | $1.8B | ||
| Q2 24 | — | $1.0B |
| Q1 26 | — | 10.1% | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 20.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 25.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 22.7% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 21.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 28.4% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 29.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 16.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 16.4% | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 15.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 15.2% | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 15.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 15.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 13.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 15.0% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | — | 1.20× | ||
| Q3 25 | — | 1.41× | ||
| Q2 25 | — | 1.24× | ||
| Q1 25 | — | 1.36× | ||
| Q4 24 | — | 1.51× | ||
| Q3 24 | — | 1.59× | ||
| Q2 24 | — | 1.14× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
TYGO
Segment breakdown not available.
UNP
| Freight revenues | $5.9B | 95% |
| Other revenues | $324.0M | 5% |
