vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Tyler Technologies (TYL) and VILLAGE SUPER MARKET INC (VLGEA). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Tyler Technologies is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($613.5M vs $582.6M, roughly 1.1× VILLAGE SUPER MARKET INC). Tyler Technologies runs the higher net margin — 13.2% vs 2.1%, a 11.2% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Tyler Technologies posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (8.6% vs 4.5%). VILLAGE SUPER MARKET INC produced more free cash flow last quarter ($10.7M vs $2.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Tyler Technologies's revenue compounded faster (6.5% CAGR vs 0.6%).
Tyler Technologies, Inc. is an American technology company based in Plano, Texas, that provides proprietary software to the U.S. public sector. Tyler Technologies has offices in 17 states and one in Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
A supermarket is a self-service shop offering a wide variety of food, beverages and household products, organized into sections under one roof. The supermarket retail format first appeared around 1930 in the United States as the culmination of almost two decades of retail innovations to the grocery store, and began to spread to other countries after extensive worldwide publicity in 1956. In everyday American English usage, "grocery store" is often used interchangeably with "supermarket", whil...
TYL vs VLGEA — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q1 FY2026
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $613.5M | $582.6M |
| Net Profit | $81.2M | $12.0M |
| Gross Margin | 48.3% | 28.3% |
| Operating Margin | 16.3% | 2.6% |
| Net Margin | 13.2% | 2.1% |
| Revenue YoY | 8.6% | 4.5% |
| Net Profit YoY | — | -6.3% |
| EPS (diluted) | $1.88 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q1 26 | $613.5M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $575.2M | $582.6M | ||
| Q3 25 | $595.9M | $599.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $596.1M | $563.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $565.2M | $599.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $541.1M | $557.7M | ||
| Q3 24 | $543.3M | $578.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $541.0M | $546.4M |
| Q1 26 | $81.2M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $65.5M | $12.0M | ||
| Q3 25 | $84.4M | $15.5M | ||
| Q2 25 | $84.6M | $11.2M | ||
| Q1 25 | $81.1M | $16.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $65.2M | $12.8M | ||
| Q3 24 | $75.9M | $15.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $67.7M | $9.0M |
| Q1 26 | 48.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 45.5% | 28.3% | ||
| Q3 25 | 47.2% | 28.2% | ||
| Q2 25 | 45.8% | 28.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 47.3% | 28.4% | ||
| Q4 24 | 43.8% | 29.0% | ||
| Q3 24 | 43.7% | 29.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 44.0% | 28.5% |
| Q1 26 | 16.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 13.0% | 2.6% | ||
| Q3 25 | 16.4% | 3.4% | ||
| Q2 25 | 16.0% | 2.4% | ||
| Q1 25 | 15.8% | 3.7% | ||
| Q4 24 | 13.2% | 2.9% | ||
| Q3 24 | 15.2% | 3.3% | ||
| Q2 24 | 14.4% | 1.9% |
| Q1 26 | 13.2% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 11.4% | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 25 | 14.2% | 2.6% | ||
| Q2 25 | 14.2% | 2.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | 14.3% | 2.8% | ||
| Q4 24 | 12.1% | 2.3% | ||
| Q3 24 | 14.0% | 2.7% | ||
| Q2 24 | 12.5% | 1.6% |
| Q1 26 | $1.88 | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.50 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.93 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.93 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.84 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.48 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.74 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.57 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $346.4M | $117.7M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | — | $55.7M |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $3.6B | $501.1M |
| Total Assets | $4.8B | $1.0B |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | — | 0.11× |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $346.4M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $1.1B | $117.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $950.8M | $110.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $892.3M | $115.4M | ||
| Q1 25 | $807.4M | $133.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $768.0M | $117.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $544.3M | $117.3M | ||
| Q2 24 | $258.0M | $113.9M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $599.7M | $55.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $599.2M | $58.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $598.8M | $60.3M | ||
| Q1 25 | $598.4M | $62.7M | ||
| Q4 24 | $597.9M | $69.9M | ||
| Q3 24 | $597.5M | $72.2M | ||
| Q2 24 | $597.1M | $74.6M |
| Q1 26 | $3.6B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $3.7B | $501.1M | ||
| Q3 25 | $3.6B | $492.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $3.6B | $479.7M | ||
| Q1 25 | $3.5B | $472.0M | ||
| Q4 24 | $3.4B | $457.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $3.3B | $447.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $3.1B | $436.2M |
| Q1 26 | $4.8B | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $5.6B | $1.0B | ||
| Q3 25 | $5.5B | $1.0B | ||
| Q2 25 | $5.4B | $995.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $5.2B | $1.0B | ||
| Q4 24 | $5.2B | $990.3M | ||
| Q3 24 | $5.0B | $981.7M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.8B | $970.2M |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.16× | 0.11× | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.17× | 0.12× | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.16× | 0.13× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.17× | 0.13× | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.18× | 0.15× | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.18× | 0.16× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.19× | 0.17× |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | | |
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $107.3M | $19.7M |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $2.0M | $10.7M |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 0.3% | 1.8% |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | — | 1.5% |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | 1.32× | 1.64× |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $585.7M | $36.7M |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q1 26 | $107.3M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $243.9M | $19.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $255.2M | $21.7M | ||
| Q2 25 | $98.3M | $10.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $56.2M | $40.8M | ||
| Q4 24 | $224.8M | $20.2M | ||
| Q3 24 | $263.7M | $22.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $64.3M | $9.4M |
| Q1 26 | $2.0M | — | ||
| Q4 25 | $239.6M | $10.7M | ||
| Q3 25 | $251.3M | $11.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $92.8M | $-10.6M | ||
| Q1 25 | $53.8M | $24.9M | ||
| Q4 24 | $221.0M | $8.5M | ||
| Q3 24 | $260.8M | $13.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $57.7M | $-10.0M |
| Q1 26 | 0.3% | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 41.7% | 1.8% | ||
| Q3 25 | 42.2% | 1.9% | ||
| Q2 25 | 15.6% | -1.9% | ||
| Q1 25 | 9.5% | 4.2% | ||
| Q4 24 | 40.8% | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 24 | 48.0% | 2.4% | ||
| Q2 24 | 10.7% | -1.8% |
| Q1 26 | — | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 0.8% | 1.5% | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.7% | 1.7% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.9% | 3.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.4% | 2.6% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.7% | 2.1% | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.5% | 1.6% | ||
| Q2 24 | 1.2% | 3.5% |
| Q1 26 | 1.32× | — | ||
| Q4 25 | 3.72× | 1.64× | ||
| Q3 25 | 3.02× | 1.40× | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.16× | 0.95× | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.69× | 2.41× | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.45× | 1.58× | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.47× | 1.48× | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.95× | 1.04× |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
TYL
| Subscriptions | $429.7M | 70% |
| Maintenance | $108.9M | 18% |
| Other | $74.9M | 12% |
VLGEA
| Center Store | $342.7M | 59% |
| Fresh | $211.0M | 36% |
| Pharmacy | $26.3M | 5% |
| Other Product | $2.6M | 0% |
