vs

Side-by-side financial comparison of Tyler Technologies (TYL) and Westlake Chemical Partners LP (WLKP). Click either name above to swap in a different company.

Tyler Technologies is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($613.5M vs $323.0M, roughly 1.9× Westlake Chemical Partners LP). Tyler Technologies runs the higher net margin — 13.2% vs 4.5%, a 8.7% gap on every dollar of revenue. On growth, Westlake Chemical Partners LP posted the faster year-over-year revenue change (11.4% vs 8.6%). Westlake Chemical Partners LP produced more free cash flow last quarter ($111.5M vs $2.0M). Over the past eight quarters, Westlake Chemical Partners LP's revenue compounded faster (6.5% CAGR vs 6.5%).

Tyler Technologies, Inc. is an American technology company based in Plano, Texas, that provides proprietary software to the U.S. public sector. Tyler Technologies has offices in 17 states and one in Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Westlake Chemical Partners LP is a petrochemical limited partnership that manufactures and markets basic products including ethylene, polyethylene, and styrene monomers. It operates mainly in North America, serving packaging, construction, consumer goods, and industrial manufacturing sectors.

TYL vs WLKP — Head-to-Head

Bigger by revenue
TYL
TYL
1.9× larger
TYL
$613.5M
$323.0M
WLKP
Growing faster (revenue YoY)
WLKP
WLKP
+2.8% gap
WLKP
11.4%
8.6%
TYL
Higher net margin
TYL
TYL
8.7% more per $
TYL
13.2%
4.5%
WLKP
More free cash flow
WLKP
WLKP
$109.5M more FCF
WLKP
$111.5M
$2.0M
TYL
Faster 2-yr revenue CAGR
WLKP
WLKP
Annualised
WLKP
6.5%
6.5%
TYL

Income Statement — Q1 FY2026 vs Q4 FY2025

Metric
TYL
TYL
WLKP
WLKP
Revenue
$613.5M
$323.0M
Net Profit
$81.2M
$14.5M
Gross Margin
48.3%
30.0%
Operating Margin
16.3%
27.8%
Net Margin
13.2%
4.5%
Revenue YoY
8.6%
11.4%
Net Profit YoY
-3.0%
EPS (diluted)
$1.88

Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.

8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend

Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.

Revenue
TYL
TYL
WLKP
WLKP
Q1 26
$613.5M
Q4 25
$575.2M
$323.0M
Q3 25
$595.9M
$308.9M
Q2 25
$596.1M
$297.1M
Q1 25
$565.2M
$237.6M
Q4 24
$541.1M
$290.1M
Q3 24
$543.3M
$277.0M
Q2 24
$541.0M
$284.2M
Net Profit
TYL
TYL
WLKP
WLKP
Q1 26
$81.2M
Q4 25
$65.5M
$14.5M
Q3 25
$84.4M
$14.7M
Q2 25
$84.6M
$14.6M
Q1 25
$81.1M
$4.9M
Q4 24
$65.2M
$15.0M
Q3 24
$75.9M
$18.1M
Q2 24
$67.7M
$14.4M
Gross Margin
TYL
TYL
WLKP
WLKP
Q1 26
48.3%
Q4 25
45.5%
30.0%
Q3 25
47.2%
32.2%
Q2 25
45.8%
32.8%
Q1 25
47.3%
22.8%
Q4 24
43.8%
34.0%
Q3 24
43.7%
42.2%
Q2 24
44.0%
35.6%
Operating Margin
TYL
TYL
WLKP
WLKP
Q1 26
16.3%
Q4 25
13.0%
27.8%
Q3 25
16.4%
29.8%
Q2 25
16.0%
30.7%
Q1 25
15.8%
19.6%
Q4 24
13.2%
31.7%
Q3 24
15.2%
39.6%
Q2 24
14.4%
32.9%
Net Margin
TYL
TYL
WLKP
WLKP
Q1 26
13.2%
Q4 25
11.4%
4.5%
Q3 25
14.2%
4.7%
Q2 25
14.2%
4.9%
Q1 25
14.3%
2.1%
Q4 24
12.1%
5.2%
Q3 24
14.0%
6.5%
Q2 24
12.5%
5.1%
EPS (diluted)
TYL
TYL
WLKP
WLKP
Q1 26
$1.88
Q4 25
$1.50
Q3 25
$1.93
Q2 25
$1.93
Q1 25
$1.84
Q4 24
$1.48
Q3 24
$1.74
Q2 24
$1.57

Balance Sheet & Financial Strength

Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.

Metric
TYL
TYL
WLKP
WLKP
Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand
$346.4M
$44.3M
Total DebtLower is stronger
Stockholders' EquityBook value
$3.6B
Total Assets
$4.8B
$1.3B
Debt / EquityLower = less leverage

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Cash + ST Investments
TYL
TYL
WLKP
WLKP
Q1 26
$346.4M
Q4 25
$1.1B
$44.3M
Q3 25
$950.8M
$37.9M
Q2 25
$892.3M
$36.6M
Q1 25
$807.4M
$49.6M
Q4 24
$768.0M
$58.3M
Q3 24
$544.3M
$60.2M
Q2 24
$258.0M
$66.0M
Total Debt
TYL
TYL
WLKP
WLKP
Q1 26
Q4 25
$599.7M
Q3 25
$599.2M
Q2 25
$598.8M
Q1 25
$598.4M
Q4 24
$597.9M
Q3 24
$597.5M
Q2 24
$597.1M
Stockholders' Equity
TYL
TYL
WLKP
WLKP
Q1 26
$3.6B
Q4 25
$3.7B
Q3 25
$3.6B
Q2 25
$3.6B
Q1 25
$3.5B
Q4 24
$3.4B
Q3 24
$3.3B
Q2 24
$3.1B
Total Assets
TYL
TYL
WLKP
WLKP
Q1 26
$4.8B
Q4 25
$5.6B
$1.3B
Q3 25
$5.5B
$1.3B
Q2 25
$5.4B
$1.3B
Q1 25
$5.2B
$1.4B
Q4 24
$5.2B
$1.3B
Q3 24
$5.0B
$1.3B
Q2 24
$4.8B
$1.3B
Debt / Equity
TYL
TYL
WLKP
WLKP
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.16×
Q3 25
0.17×
Q2 25
0.16×
Q1 25
0.17×
Q4 24
0.18×
Q3 24
0.18×
Q2 24
0.19×

Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency

How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.

Metric
TYL
TYL
WLKP
WLKP
Operating Cash FlowLast quarter
$107.3M
$120.4M
Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex
$2.0M
$111.5M
FCF MarginFCF / Revenue
0.3%
34.5%
Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue
2.7%
Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit
1.32×
8.28×
TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters
$585.7M
$201.7M

8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.

Operating Cash Flow
TYL
TYL
WLKP
WLKP
Q1 26
$107.3M
Q4 25
$243.9M
$120.4M
Q3 25
$255.2M
$105.2M
Q2 25
$98.3M
$9.1M
Q1 25
$56.2M
$45.8M
Q4 24
$224.8M
$132.5M
Q3 24
$263.7M
$126.1M
Q2 24
$64.3M
$121.9M
Free Cash Flow
TYL
TYL
WLKP
WLKP
Q1 26
$2.0M
Q4 25
$239.6M
$111.5M
Q3 25
$251.3M
$75.6M
Q2 25
$92.8M
$-15.3M
Q1 25
$53.8M
$29.8M
Q4 24
$221.0M
$119.0M
Q3 24
$260.8M
$110.5M
Q2 24
$57.7M
$111.7M
FCF Margin
TYL
TYL
WLKP
WLKP
Q1 26
0.3%
Q4 25
41.7%
34.5%
Q3 25
42.2%
24.5%
Q2 25
15.6%
-5.2%
Q1 25
9.5%
12.6%
Q4 24
40.8%
41.0%
Q3 24
48.0%
39.9%
Q2 24
10.7%
39.3%
Capex Intensity
TYL
TYL
WLKP
WLKP
Q1 26
Q4 25
0.8%
2.7%
Q3 25
0.7%
9.6%
Q2 25
0.9%
8.2%
Q1 25
0.4%
6.7%
Q4 24
0.7%
4.6%
Q3 24
0.5%
5.6%
Q2 24
1.2%
3.6%
Cash Conversion
TYL
TYL
WLKP
WLKP
Q1 26
1.32×
Q4 25
3.72×
8.28×
Q3 25
3.02×
7.18×
Q2 25
1.16×
0.62×
Q1 25
0.69×
9.25×
Q4 24
3.45×
8.83×
Q3 24
3.47×
6.95×
Q2 24
0.95×
8.45×

Financial Flow Comparison

Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.

Revenue Breakdown by Segment

TYL
TYL

Subscriptions$429.7M70%
Maintenance$108.9M18%
Other$74.9M12%

WLKP
WLKP

Affiliated Entity$296.9M92%
Nonrelated Party$26.2M8%

Related Comparisons