vs
Side-by-side financial comparison of Under Armour, Inc. (UAA) and VinFast Auto Ltd. (VFS). Click either name above to swap in a different company.
Under Armour, Inc. is the larger business by last-quarter revenue ($1.3B vs $718.6M, roughly 1.8× VinFast Auto Ltd.). VinFast Auto Ltd. runs the higher net margin — -2.8% vs -32.4%, a 29.7% gap on every dollar of revenue.
Under Armour, Inc. is an American sportswear company that manufactures footwear and apparel headquartered in Baltimore, Maryland, United States.
VinFast Auto Ltd. is a Vietnamese multinational automotive company founded by Vingroup, one of the largest private conglomerates in Vietnam that was founded by Phạm Nhật Vượng.
UAA vs VFS — Head-to-Head
Income Statement — Q3 FY2026 vs Q3 FY2025
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.3B | $718.6M |
| Net Profit | $-430.8M | $-20.0M |
| Gross Margin | 44.4% | — |
| Operating Margin | -11.3% | -96.1% |
| Net Margin | -32.4% | -2.8% |
| Revenue YoY | -5.2% | — |
| Net Profit YoY | -35013.0% | — |
| EPS (diluted) | $-1.01 | — |
Green = leading value per metric. Periods may differ when fiscal calendars don't align.
8-Quarter Revenue & Profit Trend
Side-by-side quarterly history. Quarters aligned by calendar period so offset fiscal years line up.
| Q4 25 | $1.3B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.3B | $718.6M | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.1B | $663.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.2B | $656.5M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $1.4B | $511.6M | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $1.3B | $302.6M |
| Q4 25 | $-430.8M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-18.8M | $-20.0M | ||
| Q2 25 | $-2.6M | $-51.8M | ||
| Q1 25 | $-67.5M | $-26.1M | ||
| Q4 24 | $1.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $170.4M | $-10.4M | ||
| Q2 24 | $-305.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $6.6M | $-618.3M |
| Q4 25 | 44.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 47.3% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 48.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 46.7% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 47.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 49.8% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 47.5% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 45.0% | — |
| Q4 25 | -11.3% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.3% | -96.1% | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.3% | -79.0% | ||
| Q1 25 | -6.1% | -74.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 1.0% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.4% | -65.9% | ||
| Q2 24 | -25.3% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -0.3% | -139.4% |
| Q4 25 | -32.4% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -1.4% | -2.8% | ||
| Q2 25 | -0.2% | -7.8% | ||
| Q1 25 | -5.7% | -4.0% | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.1% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 12.2% | -2.0% | ||
| Q2 24 | -25.8% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.5% | -204.3% |
| Q4 25 | $-1.01 | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-0.04 | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $-0.01 | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-0.16 | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $0.00 | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $0.39 | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $-0.70 | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $0.02 | — |
Balance Sheet & Financial Strength
Snapshot of each company's liquidity, leverage and book value from the latest quarter.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Cash + ST InvestmentsLiquidity on hand | $464.6M | $8.8M |
| Total DebtLower is stronger | $989.7M | — |
| Stockholders' EquityBook value | $1.4B | — |
| Total Assets | $4.6B | $183.2M |
| Debt / EquityLower = less leverage | 0.69× | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $464.6M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $396.0M | $8.8M | ||
| Q2 25 | $911.0M | $650.0M | ||
| Q1 25 | $501.4M | $2.4M | ||
| Q4 24 | $726.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $530.7M | $1.9M | ||
| Q2 24 | $884.6M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $858.7M | $3.0M |
| Q4 25 | $989.7M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.2B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $989.2M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $595.1M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $595.2M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $594.6M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $595.4M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $675.8M | — |
| Q4 25 | $1.4B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $1.9B | $-7.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $1.9B | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $2.0B | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $1.8B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $2.2B | — |
| Q4 25 | $4.6B | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $4.9B | $183.2M | ||
| Q2 25 | $4.9B | $7.2B | ||
| Q1 25 | $4.3B | $158.2M | ||
| Q4 24 | $4.6B | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $4.5B | $151.8M | ||
| Q2 24 | $4.9B | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $4.8B | $145.6M |
| Q4 25 | 0.69× | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 0.64× | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 0.53× | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 0.31× | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 0.30× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 0.30× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 0.33× | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 0.31× | — |
Cash Flow & Capital Efficiency
How much cash each business actually produces after reinvestment. Cash flow is harder to manipulate than net income.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Operating Cash FlowLast quarter | $278.1M | — |
| Free Cash FlowOCF − Capex | $261.9M | — |
| FCF MarginFCF / Revenue | 19.7% | — |
| Capex IntensityCapex / Revenue | 1.2% | — |
| Cash ConversionOCF / Net Profit | — | — |
| TTM Free Cash FlowTrailing 4 quarters | $-45.9M | — |
8-quarter trend — quarters aligned by calendar period.
| Q4 25 | $278.1M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-69.8M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $48.9M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-202.2M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $311.3M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-321.4M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $153.0M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-122.9M | — |
| Q4 25 | $261.9M | — | ||
| Q3 25 | $-90.3M | — | ||
| Q2 25 | $13.5M | — | ||
| Q1 25 | $-231.0M | — | ||
| Q4 24 | $262.9M | — | ||
| Q3 24 | $-367.2M | — | ||
| Q2 24 | $107.3M | — | ||
| Q1 24 | $-156.7M | — |
| Q4 25 | 19.7% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | -6.8% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 1.2% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | -19.6% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 18.8% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -26.2% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 9.1% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -11.8% | — |
| Q4 25 | 1.2% | — | ||
| Q3 25 | 1.5% | — | ||
| Q2 25 | 3.1% | — | ||
| Q1 25 | 2.4% | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 3.5% | — | ||
| Q3 24 | 3.3% | — | ||
| Q2 24 | 3.9% | — | ||
| Q1 24 | 2.5% | — |
| Q4 25 | — | — | ||
| Q3 25 | — | — | ||
| Q2 25 | — | — | ||
| Q1 25 | — | — | ||
| Q4 24 | 252.26× | — | ||
| Q3 24 | -1.89× | — | ||
| Q2 24 | — | — | ||
| Q1 24 | -18.71× | — |
Financial Flow Comparison
Revenue → gross profit → operating profit → net profit for each company.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
UAA
| Apparel | $934.0M | 70% |
| Footwear | $265.1M | 20% |
| Accessories | $107.7M | 8% |
| License | $27.2M | 2% |
VFS
| Sales of vehicles | $662.9M | 92% |
| Sales of spare parts and components | $41.3M | 6% |
| Revenue from leasing activities | $12.3M | 2% |
| Finance income | $2.4M | 0% |
| Rendering of services | $1.2M | 0% |